Chalkalis Gravity Wheel

[w32]

Hello World,
keeping my promise i am bringing you the latest news from Mr. F.M.Chalkalis blog.

"Sunday, November 6, 2011
"He who thinks freely, thinks well" a quote taken from Rigas Feraios
There were moments, while reading some articles and posts, when I felt that this world just doesn’t deserve to be given anything for free.
These were moments of great disappointment and discouragement from the behavior of some people.  But still, my personal beliefs for a better future, prevailed.
And as it proves there are many more like me out there, sharing the same beliefs.
I am saluting all the purely thinking fighters for Overunity.
The ones having the power to form their own opinion about what is really happening and do not just follow the opinions and directions of some columnists  or organizations that  “allegedly”  care for our well being.
In the following links you can find out on your own what I am talking about as well as Who are some of these gentlemen that supposedly represent the struggle for a better world.
http://www.politaia.org/freie-energie-2/energiewende-ein-brief-an-greenpeace/comment-page-1/#comment-5073   
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/energysuppression.htm 
Just search on your own “who is behind free energy organizations”

As far it concerns these still negatively commenting, I think it is not necessary to repeat the undisputed scientific certifications about its functionality.
Unfortunately, due to lack of specialized electrical knowledge as well as lack of the necessary funds required to order the appropriate pulse generator, I have not yet been able to harvest power out of the device, which though is calculated to be more than 70% usable. 

These are the latest data and development:

CHANGES IN THE DRIVING SYSTEM
The driving system is placed at 36° degrees and the first pulse is given while the second weight is located at the 1° degree. As a result, there is Smoother operation, almost silent and impressively less power consumption in the driving system.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-HuiYAGMqI&feature=player_embedded

ONE MORE ENERGY OUTPUT POINT OF THE SYSTEM
At number 4 of the comments I wrote, I say that special attention should be given to the base and the elastics.
Later I realized that my calculations «300 RPM x 50 kg = 15000 kg / min which means 900 tons per hour » were wrong. I did not calculate that at the 300 RPM of the existing prototype, the main weight is rotating at a speed of 57,650 Km / h and the external weight is rotating (running) at a speed of 126,604 Km / h.
Therefore  the pulse pressures are much higher and at 300RPM exceed the 25.000 N
Witnessing the size of that force made me realize that we can get output energy from another point of the system as well. Without changing any of the previous data.
Since then, I have conducted various experiments, trying to convert these pulse pressures to a rotary motion, but with no successful results so far. Other, larger forces, appear in the system, changing the expected behavior.
Some friends advise the use of a piezoelectric system for the collection of that power. Insisting and emphasizing, that this energy alone is enough.
Unfortunately I have no knowledge of this technology, nor access to it.

This innovation has been donated and belongs to humanity.
Hopping to the help of Every One of Us for further development.
In the past I have written about who I am and how I work. I have never asked for anything personally.
A kind request.  It would be great, if anyone willing and able to help in any way to this effort, would communicate through email.

Fotios M. Chalkalis"

You can find the letter and all links on chalkalis.blogspot.com
W32

[w32]

Dear Knovos and AeVector,
I do congratulate you for your hard work as well as your enthusiasm.
Though, I have to say you are not paying much attention to the specifications.
1)I doubt that your frames will manage to hold the forces even in such smaller scale replicas
2)You have more that 20% losses because of your NON aerodynamic shapes.
3)Mr. Chalkalis uses two pulses on every rotation, which is the 085% of the perimeter
4)The elastics on the driving system have to be with air tubes, not solid, in order to be soft enough.
We must agree with Mathew Jones, because in order to calculate the actual power we must use the new laws of mechanodynamics.

Best regard
W32

[knovos]

Dear Knovos and AeVector,
I do congratulate you for your hard work as well as your enthusiasm.
Though, I have to say you are not paying much attention to the specifications.
1)I doubt that your frames will manage to hold the forces even in such smaller scale replicas
2)You have more that 20% losses because of your NON aerodynamic shapes.
3)Mr. Chalkalis uses two pulses on every rotation, which is the 085% of the perimeter
4)The elastics on the driving system have to be with air tubes, not solid, in order to be soft enough.
We must agree with Mathew Jones, because in order to calculate the actual power we must use the new laws of mechanodynamics.

Best regard
W32

I don't have the money to buy the perfect materials. I have to work with what I have left over from older projects or collected materials pulled out of old machinery and stuff. I understand your concerns but I try to make a replication that works that have at least some overunity. From that point the time comes to make improvements or even build a second better one. Until now there is nobody who build this device and did correct measurements. We simply have to try and see first. I don't understand how you can calculate more than 20% of losses caused by the non aerodynamic shapes I used. You have only seen some pictures.
Knovos.

[knovos]

Some progress made on my blog http://knovos-chalkalisreplication.blogspot.com/
and also a first video with first impressions http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_profilepage&v=ruondAGJ6Bs/ Noting special, next steps are to make an efficient generator and later on the replacement of the AC motor with a DC motor.
Knovos.

[w32]

Hello World & Happy New Year!
I would like to inform you about the 2012 news on Mr. F.M.Chalkalis's Energy Multiplier. I would suggest you read the letter and then watch the video.

Friday, January 13, 2012

ETHELOTIFLIA

(Willful Blindness)

Happy New Year.
My wish for 2012 is for everyone to have good Health and that there be Peace and Love which unfortunately lessen more and more everyday in our civilization.
The congratulation messages of some people that even equate me to the great Leonardo Da Vinci give me the strength to continue my work.
I did not have the opportunity to study physics. Maybe if I had studied I would have never got involved with this matter.
For many years now, there are scientists shouting that Newton's theory is wrong.
I have also proved that in practice using my invention. Because in my opinion, in this theory the centrifugal force is misestimated and the effect (the phenomenon) of the lever disregarded, as well as Gravity.

Dear fellow humans, considering the amount of information exchange and communication available today, e.g. internet, it really makes me sad to realize that the Willful blindness of a large proportion of humanity   place us in a situation, worse than it was in the Middle Ages. They are prisoners of what they have been taught being unable to think on their own.
What I do not understand and troubles me, is that great scientists got to the point of searching the God in CERN and yet they could not change fundamental errors in physics we are being taught for more than 300 years now.
Also, I do not understand the other scientists and leaders of this world, who supposedly care for alternative energy, yet all the various development programs, adopt only solar, wind, bio-fuels, etc. ignoring Gravity, the endless energy to which we owe our existence as written by great scientists such as Stephen Hawking,  F.M. Kanarev  and others.

These are the latest development updates:

1.    Part of  Dr. Kanarev 's  article “ABOUT THE PERPETUAL MOTION MACHINE”, dedicated to the young mechanics of the 10th  All-Russian Congress. August 2011.
Link to the document on Google Docs
(You can download the document in PDF format from within google docs link by clicking  Ctrl+S )

2.    As you can see in the video, the driving system functions with one motor and a single flywheel. Providing the same results with a lot less consumption. It would be ideal with the appropriate tire profile.

3.    In the video you will watch an experiment in which practically, without any electro motion and any need of mathematics, I believe it is being understood, even from the more skeptics, that our system has nothing in common with the ones it is being compared to. Perhaps they will even be able to snap out of their taught physics lethargy and realize the advantages of the triangular shape, the lever and the addition of external pulse motion that make our system  functional.
Also It is clearly visible that:
•    With the use of two toothpicks, applied at 510mm distance from the shaft, we can rotate the 50 kg pendulum.
•    The spectacular amount of force cutting a 30x60mm wooden board while the second weight is still located at 32,6 degrees. The wooden board is placed at a distance of 190mm from the shaft, where we have the Maximum power. That equals to only 11% of the force, torque we had at that given moment.  Now, consider the size of the force, torque on 180 degrees plus the momentum of centrifugal force on higher rpm.

4.    Output energy, as I wrote before, has to be harvested from the main shaft. Starting when the second weight passes the 0 degree point and ending when the second weight again passes the 180 degrees.
In the example with the painted tube (cylinder) on the main shaft, you may see another way of how I imagine a pulse generator with the magnets build on the main shaft and passing the coils only during the falling. The size of the generator can be increased by adding more magnets in length. Every millimeter away from the diameter of the main shaft is as a loss.
5.    Regarding smaller size constructions, I believe that reading the brilliant example used by Hughe at "Nexus" is the best way to make you understand why in the past I wrote that if my space allowed it, I would have used heavier weights or longer arm or even both and certainly longer lever. 

All efforts are welcome in our fight but in smaller size constructions the results (the effect) will be invisible causing disappointment and misleading evidence. Please do not derogate from the specifications.
Good Luck to everyone.

Fotis Miltiadis Chalkalis
Video: http://www.youtube.com/F.M.Chalkalis 2012 Update
__________________
Best wishes to all
W32[/b]