Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Rosemary Ainslie]

This is too funny !!
Whats wrong "Dooziedont" or Rosemary Ann Ainslie .... you can't go back and edit out your comments at YouTube can you now .... LOL !!The NERD RATS abandoned the magical vessel months ago and just like a good captain Dooziedont you go down with the ship all alone again

As to this post.  It is always a good thing to laugh.  Appropriate or otherwise.  So I'm delighted to see that you're amused.  I am well able to delete my comments on TK's youtube.  I was rather hoping that I could confine my input there - exclusively. That way I would not have needed to do those analyses of those absurd exercises here on this thread.  It seems that I am not allowed.  'Access denied'.  Which I can understand.  Apparently our little TinselKoala is not so much a man as a mouse.  Else he'd be able to confront those challenges without the orchestrated assistance of you, picowatt and MileHigh.  Courage is NOT his thing.  He needs to work in 'packs'.  As is needed when one's reliance is - as is HIS - on poor science - advanced for the purpose of propaganda or 'spin'. Since I am NOT advancing propaganda - I have no such reliance.

Regarding this comment..

What "HATE" speech from me ?? I have only supplied questions that have never been answered by you Rosemary over and over again that's been posted by me, but than again I cant fix Rosemary your misrepresentations, stupidity, ignorance and lack of a good education.

If you still need to know 'what "HATE" speech - as you put it then another sample of it is right here.  You CANNOT post without its evidence - apparently.

What a dish of "CRAP" your trying to feed us this is right up there with your viruses in your APPLE computers years ago, something happens to your vicious wiener dog with a break in four days ago and you wait until today to type something about it .... YA RIGHT !! You really do think we are all that stupid ?? No one any where believes a thing you type with those old crooked fingers slamming on that computer key board of yours.

Unless, of course, those rather less than charming observations of yours are meant to be something in the nature of 'adoration'?  Or even 'impartialiaty'?  I'm entirely satisfied that everyone reading anything at all that you ever write or reference - will know better than to think that you're capable of an intelligent, objective  and balanced post.  Sadly.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

continued/...

As for myself being excessively jealous of what ?? There is nothing in entire the world you Rosemary could teach me or anything I would want to learn from you.

I most certainly 'taught you' - over extended hours and extended days.  I taught you how to elicit that waveform on your replication apparatus.  After first teaching you how to put that apparatus together.  And I ably assisted you in finding the required machinery to measure it.  You remember that FTC?  That replication that you subsequently DENY is a replication?

To have anything related in any way to you Rosemary or your electronic device(s) experimental work promoted in my own name, I would rather be naked tared and feathered then drug behind a Yugo from west coast to east coast of the United States than to face the outright damning humility of anything so stupid as all your fraudulent device claims.

Well.  This is somewhat BELIED by the very real evidence of this link where you claim to have REPLICATED our COP>17 test...
http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems

Which means that you really need to withdraw that paper where your name is most ASSUREDLY linked to my own - and my own being FIRST AUTHOR.  Or else, as you recommend - start stripping - get yourself 'tarred and feathered' and then allow yourself to be dragged behind a Yugo from west coast to east cost of the United States.  Because you most certainly ARE facing the 'damning humility' of being INTIMATELY associated with what you 'aver' is our and by association YOUR 'fraudulent device claim'. 

You Rosemary need professional medical help from a expert that can only be found somewhere other than in South Africa, a expert that's not some kind of cave dwelling Witch Doctor. 

So you keep saying.  I think the 'reality disconnect' is only actually and most clearly evidential in your own rather imbalanced psyche.

Rosie Pose

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Now.  A quick reference to this number.

Regretfuly, I read some more of your "post".  Even in this post, you continue to make threats towards me.

Such class, such professionalism, and oh so scientific...

And indeed you are paranoid, if your delusions are directed my way.  I do not hate you or wish you ill, but I do not appreciate anyone who threatens me and calls me a liar.  Your threats cross a line.  We are through.

And as for slander, there has to be a falsehood.  Nothing I said was false. You slander yourself.  Take my posts and your posts to a EE prof, or a first year EE, and see what is false.

And indeed, when have I ever threatened you?

Good day

If slander is proof of 'good will'  then - INDEED - I am deluded.  And - as you say - slander needs to be proved 'false'.  I prove your contentions 'false' on multiple grounds.  In the first instance I am well able to work a solder iron.  I soldered the clips to our battery leads in our circuit apparatus.  And I am well able to 'read, write and do arithmetic' as I am intellectually competent.   Intellectual competence is defined as an 'adult' competence related to precisely those skills.  Your average 6 year old and 'under' is NOT - BY DEFINITION - intellectually competent. He is not even accountable for his actions.  He is not an adult. 

I do not call you a liar.  You have branded yourself as a liar when you claim that any six year old has intellectual competence and when you compound this with the statement that they are able to use a solder iron.  Never.  Not under any circumstances can they or should they be encouraged to work a solder iron.  Unless they are WHOLLY ASSISTED and entirely removed from the potential risk contact with the hot solder.  Which means that they cannot be taught to an adult level of competency - where one is expected to perform this unassisted.  And terms of your subsequent explanation - they cannot do this with an adult competency.  Else they'd be soldering UNASSISTED.  By your own admission - THEY NEEDED HELP.  And it is a rare under six who is able to read, write and do arithmetic to an adult level of competence.  I merely advised you that I was incapable of believing those 'aspersions' related to an under sixes' competence.  And nor can I.  I am NOT sufficiently DELUDED.

Your intention was to imply that I cannot solder and that I do not have an intellectual competence.  THAT is easily proven false.  Therefore have you slandered my good name.  If your opinion mattered - I'd call you to account.  In due course you WILL be called to account.  But not for something as essentially petty as your poor efforts at slander.  And this is NOT a THREAT.  It is a promise.

Rosie Pose.
Added

AND INDEED YOU HAVE THREATENED ME.  I have a long memory.  And I know exactly who you are.

[fuzzytomcat]

Perhaps it's the 'hatred' that is evident in TK's, MileHigh's - picowatt's - FTC's posts.

FTC is a different 'kettle of fish'.  It is my opinion that he's excessively jealous of this our work and would prefer to have it promoted in his own name. 

I still see more misrepresentations of my answer to your quote dooziedont ..... err Rosemary .... LOL !!!

What HATRED ?? Where ?? What Posting ?? What e-mail ??

What jealousy ?? Where ?? Of what ?? What promotions of mine are you spewing venom about ?? Where ?? What Posting ?? What e-mail ??

As for the rest of your posted CRAP your trying to feed everyone, your out of your mind and if you helped me in any way shape or form and you have no proof you did because there is none. Where are the postings or e-mails of you guiding my hands to what ?? You had no proof of anything you did for your claim of a COP>17 without any scope shots, data dumps, photographs or even a damn device to show anyone Rosemary or Dooziedont !!! Just your collection of presented facts on any single test is the worse representation of of data for proof of a claim anyone has seen especially for submission to a journal or magazine for peer review and possible publication  .... I'd spit in your face for that insult if you were in front of me, all one has to do is look at one of my tests for a example of "HOW ITS DONE" https://skydrive.live.com/redir.aspx?cid=6b7817c40bb20460&resid=6B7817C40BB20460!144&parid=6B7817C40BB20460!120&authkey=!AHln8XUBQ2XZVNY   (Test #18 ZIP file 8.5 MB) or look at the collection of data "ALL IN ONE PLACE" not all cherry picked like you have to suit your your stupid THESIS.

As for any document like the http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems this unfortunately has a set of real people and experimentalist attached to it .... R.A Ainslie, H.W Gramm, G.A Lettenmaier, A.Palise, A. Gardiner, D Martin, S. Windisch .... and a majority of those authors have requested this document to stay and it will until there isn't a internet to display it.

So ... wait for your replacement parts to show up for your COP>INFINITY device that you threw away to destroy the evidence like the COP>17  device of yours you did and go do your little testing somewhere, maybe you can figure out  how to read the testing equipment correctly.

I also don't debate fantasies, illusions or misrepresentations which you Rosemary or Dooziedont only have,  I'll stick to my verifiable facts if you don't mind because I do.

Now ... stay on topic here if you possibly can this is a "Tar Baby" device thread which I know is impossible for you  but try, all this BS of yours is annoying and Stefan did require you to do "ALL NEW" testing so whats your problem now ?? 

[TinselKoala]

Yesterday, Ainslie lied,

This will be my last post on this thread - until I finalise that 'dissertation' related to TK's videos.

and I predicted that she would not keep her word.

And I was right.

She's back with STILL MORE LIES, dripping with vitriol, now claiming again that she didn't post the demo video. How many times now has she flipped on that issue?

Ainslie, your threats, veiled and not so veiled, and your continual chain of lies are recorded and you can't get rid of them, no matter how much editing and backtracking you do. The threads are ARCHIVED and you can't change those records. Your idiocy is on record, your failure to cooperate is on record, and your incompetency is on record. But most especially, the lies that you put in each and every post you make are still on record. And you cannot delete or alter the inane comments you made on my videos.

Even in the last few posts...... "WHERE DID I EVER DENY THIS" claiming that you DIDN'T deny being doozydont and posting the video....... and the evidence is presented where you DID deny it over and over .... and then you DENY IT yet again by claiming someone else had access to your computer (an excuse that I came up with and predicted you would use, remember?).  You contradict yourself within a single page. You are truly pathetic, and I am beginning to be less amused by you and starting to feel genuinely sorry for you. More sorry for the people who have to deal with you personally.... but I do pity you, Ainslie. You have no concept of reality.

WHERE HAVE I EVER DENIED THIS?

How about in the NEXT SET OF POSTS YOU MAKE?  You lying fool, there are posts from you going back to the days immediately after YOU posted that demo video where you link to it and brag about it announcing it to all and sundry. And now you get all tangled up in your lies.
Ainslie says now:

Your spin is unending and abysmal.  I freely and openly acknowledged that you took that video off my own youtube.  I freely and openly acknowledged that I was not aware that it was ON my own youtube.  Why did you not post THAT reference? 

Because it was a LIE, Ainslie. YOU posted that video and even bragged about it in your blog and on this forum shortly after YOU posted it PUBLICLY. To say that I "took that video" is another lie, because YOU POSTED IT a year ago, and I wasn't even aware of it until January.

Because that was my own reference when I challenged you to deny this.  And my admission - of necessity was only SUBSEQUENT to my earlier statement where I accused you of 'rifling' my photobucket. 

Getting all tangled up there, aren't you? The whole accusation of someone rifling your photobucket was another blatant example of your paranoia and incompetence with computers. And the only reason--- of necessity-- that you finally had to admit that was wrong was when YOU WERE REMINDED THAT THE VIDEO IS POSTED ON YOUTUBE ALONG WITH THE DATE AND THE USER WHO POSTED IT.

Such a glaring omission.  I have never subsequently removed that video link of the demonstration.  And this out of respect to our readers that they can, at least, find the appropriate reference when and IF they read your appalling posts. 

No.... you haven't used that doozydont account because you lost the password and have only just now found it. YT ALSO RECORDS when the last time the username was used.... and you haven't used it for over a year... and now suddenly you log on. YOU LOST YOUR PASSWORD and have just now recovered it. You would take that video down if you could get away with it... but it would look really bad if you did it now. Go ahead, though... I've got a copy and will immediately repost it. 

Else they won't understand your multiple - excessive - references.  I am, nonetheless, well able to remove that video link should I choose to.  And self-evidently I've chosen NOT to.  And that it's there at all, is because I have often relied on my colleagues to work on my computer through Team Viewer.  This upload was an unfortunate consequence of a misunderstanding.

Liar. You did it yourself, you wrote the description: it is in your own inimitable style and everyone knows this, and YOU CROWED ABOUT THE VIDEO right after you uploaded it, like a baby proud of her tight little defecation. And all this is recorded, even on your own blog. Of course when you remember that password you'll probably edit those comments out too, but they are recorded elsewhere in places you cannot touch.

But I'll live with it - gladly.  I am that old now that I realise that even errors are required to advance certain insights.  And IF this video needed airing - and IF there's a Devine purpose behind our lives - then I suspect that it's served its purpose to show us all how utterly small are your objections and how entirely you need to advance all your 'SPIN'.  Spin has never constituted a scientific argument - any more than inference, implication or 'belief'.  Your emphases are always a salutary reminder.

I'll deal with that specific video in my next post to you.  It's a perfect example of your reliance on all that SPIN rather than on science.

How about dealing with the issues of YOUR TESTING?
How about telling us just what the IsoTech GFG324 is and where you got one?
How about correcting some of your incredibly stupid errors and mistakes? No...you are too busy combing though my videos, complaining about the lighting and totally missing the point.

Bubba you're getting tedious in the extreme.  Correctly it is one Joule per second - but since 1 watt = 1 Joule and since 1 Joule = 1 watt per second - then AS I'VE EXPLAINED EARLIER - the terms are INTERCHANGEABLE.  Which is ALSO explained in WIKI.  Much more important is that you answer your earlier concern that a battery can deliver a negative current flow - which seems to be something you really CAN endorse.  Somehow?

I'm not going to answer any more of your posts Bubba.  They're getting too tedious.  And they've got absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic.

Rosemary

Got that, Bubba? Units of power and energy will be defined as Ainslie wants, not how physics uses them, and the issue of the units of power and energy have absolutely nothing to do with .... measuring the power and energy of an Ains-lie.