Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 122 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: Magluvin on July 25, 2012, 12:17:18 AM
So what are the limits?  ;]

Mags
Well, it does work with 60 uH chokes of good core material and heavy wire, like in the prototype, and it does work with the cheapo 100 uH RatShack chokes as long as they don't short out. It doesn't work with a shorted choke, for more than a few seconds.

So I'd say wind your own chokes, using heavy magnet wire and a good RF ferrite, on a toroid or spool bobbin.
Or if you use the RS chokes, at full power (7 amps or so input) just watch the temps so the insulation doesn't break down. Or rewind them with heavier, double-insulated magnet wire, same number of turns.

Other than that.... I think these mosfets are actually rated for some crazy current like 49 amps. It will be fun to push the limits with them on good heatsinks and active cooling. I've had it to 18 volts input OK, but one needs to watch the gate-source voltage, I think this mosfet is rated only 20 volts on the gate so until I scope out what's happening at the gate I don't want to go higher on the input voltage. It may need gate voltage limiting zeners and these might kill it, I dunno. That's what the soldering iron is for, I guess.

TinselKoala


TinselKoala

On another note: I just dissected the RF choke that failed in the SN002 transmitter along with the two blown mosfeet. The ferrite is actually fractured right in two at the place where the insulation failure happened! This is a very localised spot on the choke. It is as if all the reflected power bounced back into the mosfets and the chokes and was released at these three points. The choke core was only held together by the wire wrapping it. Since all the enamel insulation was blown off the wire, the choke windings were shorted through the overlapping layers at this point.

TinselKoala

"For some reason.....?"

I am not getting the sense that the student is actually _understanding_ the teacher's poynts.

Could Polly Parrot describe, in her own words, the current paths that .99 is trying to illustrate? It seems that every time she tries.... EVERY time.... she gets it wrong. Her "OK" is no indication at all that she has "gotten it".... because the next time she tries to describe for herself what she's "gotten" she gets it wrong yet again.

But the suspense mounts, along with a mystery. How did TK's evil agents of suppression, coordinated from the DeepBunker in South Texas, manage to arrange with their well-paid operatives in South Africa to steal Polly's new camera on the very eve of her new live video demonstration? With all that beefed up security she's been warning about? Vicious canines, terrifying ninja gardeners, well-armed upstairs maids? An operation of international scale, mounted on short notice and pulled off without a hitch. Fortunately for the world, webcams actually can be purchased off the shelf in South Africa, if you've got the money, so we are assured that someone will be coming over on Saturday to plug a new one in for her.

Do they have Wal-Marts in Cape Town, I wonder?

TinselKoala

Oh, this burns me up. I had thought that Ainslie's imaginary lawyers had actually convinced her to stop lying and making false paranoid accusations. But I see that, as usual, Ainslie cannot take the good advice that's given her.


Quote
And guys, to be specific - here's the thing.

TK and Sean published both my own personal file downloads and the names and addresses of people whom I've been in correspondence with - but whose names I have NEVER put on the internet.  This was done after they CROWED over their breach of my computer - and then INSISTED that I had put the information out there. 
It is a LIE that she did not put all of the information that she is talking about IN PUBLIC ON THE INTERNET. Every scopeshot, every name, every phone number, and I have the links to prove it. Of course she has gone back and edited some of those posts...but perhaps she does not know about the WayBackMachine.
Furthermore, never has anyone CROWED about the non-existent "breach" of her silly toy computer(s).
To accuse me of "breaching" her computer is insane, a paranoid delusion, a total fantasy. Consider: Had I done such a thing-- were it even POSSIBLE --  with her projected "agenda" that she believes that I have.... would she be capable of accessing the internet at all today?
Quote
I still don't know how that managed that breach.  I have an Apple - which is on record as being pretty well 'breach proof'.  But.  However it was done the simple fact is this.  UNLESS TK publishes the link to those files which disclose either the downloads OR those names - then we have all the proof required that there's been this computer breach.  I've challenged him to do this.  He's declined to produce those links. 
Again, wrong. The filenames of most of the scopeshots indicate their PUBLIC SOURCES, and the posts wherein she listed all of the names I posted have also been listed by me and  by FTC and by others. Many of them appear IN THIS VERY FORUM, in the locked threads that she thinks are invisible. Again, she lies and makes accusations without proof. And I am not required by any laws of man or logic to reaffirm those sources in order to "prove my innocence" of the absurd accusation.
Quote
Then.  NOTA BENE.  TK, Glen Lettenmaier or FTC, Sean, The Boss, Evolving Ape, PhiChaser, MileHigh and picowatt - have all led a concerted attack against my name.  I am 63 years old.  I am a mother and a grandmother.  I am an upright member of our community.  I have NEVER defrauded the public in my efforts to promote a new science.  We have all of us modestly pointed to the evidence of measured anomalies as requiring investigation.
Lies again. Ainslie has attempted to gain public recognition, fame, and MONETARY PRIZES using her mendacious and erroneous claims, which are NOT EVEN SUPPORTED BY HER OWN DATA, as anyone and EVERYONE who has examined the claims and the data can attest. NOBODY who has attempted her trials has supported her claims, NOT EVEN THE MOST RECENT LABORATORY TESTING. The "modest pointing" included trumpeting to all and sundry the  "modest claim" of batteries that did not discharge (disproven) and COP > INFINITY ( ridiculous and also disproven).
QuoteNotwithstanding which - all nine of them have chosen to refer to me in terms that would embarrass your average criminal low life - but they have also been on a MISSION to entirely discredit our work.  They have 'crowed' at the fact that I've got a life threatening illness - and TK has expressed delight at the death of a close family member.   
You are indeed a liar. Please support your claim that I expressed delight with a link or a direct quote, you liar. What I expressed was my continuing contempt that you use the death of a relative, and your own illness, to gain sympathy or special treatment. Ainslie, we are ALL sick, we have ALL lost close loved ones, and it is ALL IRRELEVANT to the simple fact that you are wrong and overweeningly arrogant and willfully ignorant. Your own insulting language towards those who have tried to help you is amply documented in my database, including your disgusting cartoon insults from years ago. In short, you have NO RIGHT AT ALL to complain about how people refer to you or address you, because YOU YOURSELF, Ainslie, are perhaps the most insulting and arrogant poster this forum in particular has ever seen.
QuoteThey have unrelentingly referenced my stupidity and lack of training as reason enough to mount this attack.  And they have charged through every thread where I've posted - in order to both publicly disgrace me and to silence me. 
In order to demonstrate that you are wrong, that you lie and misrepresent, and that if you reported honestly and analysed correctly you would have NOTHING to talk about. Yes, I hope that "attack" continues unrelenting, because you are a liar, Ainslie, and indeed ignorant and yes... stupid, because you do not know how to reason correctly, nor to humble yourself before those who could teach you. Ignorance is (barely) forgivable and correctable.... your stupidity is a lifetime burden, for you and for your interlocutors. Even today, in your attempts to follow .99's explanation, you are continuing to muddle and frustrate and cling to the misconceptions that prevent your understanding your own circuit... on the eve of your alleged continued testing. Pitiful indeed.... and indeed STUPID.
Quote
Not only this but Stefan Hartman - the owner of that forum has actively encouraged this attack.  He's on record as refusing to do anything at all about the problem and went further to assure them that they were under no obligations whatsoever to conform to forum guidelines.  He even invited MileHigh and Glen Lettenmaier back into the fold when TK started his thread - to ensure that they managed to complement and add to the general disaster.  Which shows that Stefan is very much a party to that agenda.
Contrariwise, your statement here, Ainslie, again illustrates your paranoid delusions. In every sentence you say that which is untrue, a product of your own hallucinations and delusions. You could have been banned months ago, Ainslie, or you could have simply stopped posting your lies here. But we argued against banning you, and you continued to post your lies, just like this post here on your "own" honeytrap forum, a post full of lies.
Quote
So.  I put it to you that the owner of OverUnity.com is actually actively pursuing all claims of unity breach - duping us poor sods to post of this in his forum - PRECISELY to get ample opportunity to discredit such claims in any way possible - and regardless of the legal or illegal methodologies employed.  By rights any earnest seeker of this new energy would be somewhat heavily compromised to keep posting there.  And I caution you all accordingly.

Kindest regards,
Rosie   

Yeah, Ainslie.... we will be sure to give your caution all the serious consideration it deserves.  The rantings of the insane Ainslie, spouting her delusions and lies, are always amusing when they can be clearly seen for what they are.