Testing the TK Tar Baby

[hartiberlin]

I finally now banned Rosemary Ainslie from this forum.

She did again send me threats via email.

I have enough of it now.

Now if somebody wants to have further look at her work
he can go to her own forum or blog, but I will not give her anymore access
to over here.


Regards, Stefan.

[TinselKoala]

And.... bada bing !

Ainslie accomplishes a major goal. Now there is no pressure at all for her to do any kind of testing, any corrections, any consolidation of all the various versions of her daft manuscripts, any retractions of the personal insults, lies and misrepresentations of the work of others, no Dim Bulb tests, no reproductions of the questionable scope shots, no FG current measurements, no capacitor tests, no boiling of water, no 5.9 megaJoules in 96 minutes.... nothing. The pressure is off!

And it's been a _long_ time since anyone has commented on her "publications" on Rossi's JNP. And it's been quite some time since we've heard from her builder, who is using mosfet gate driver chips and his own 555 timer circuit in an attempt to boil water with a 3.7 percent ON mosfet, as an attempt to reproduce the COP>17 claim.... having already rejected the current claim as nonsensical.

And... of course, lest we forget.... the USA laboratory to which Ainslie sent her actual apparatus and her function generator... but perhaps not the magic batteries .... also found the same things that I did MONTHS AGO: the negative mean power calculation is easy to get, and the batteries do discharge at a normal rate nevertheless. So, in what I believe is an attempt to get Ainslie herself to realize the truth, they have asked for her to perform some suggested tests for herself, using their "special resistors", no doubt non-inductive shunts and/or more predictable loads.

Sigh. Now, with no pressure from here, and her various difficulties.... 3 cameras stolen, my my, maybe she needs a bigger dog.... I will be very surprised to see any testing. But of course as always, I am willing to be proven wrong... however unlikely that might be in this case.

[TinselKoala]

@.99..........

Are we having fun yet?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xweiQukBM_k

[TinselKoala]

Heh... the comedy continues. We've posted the actual International Rectifier data sheet for the IRFPG50 mosfet _many_ times, including application notes and test circuits, even to the point of posting individual images and charts to focus finely on a point.

And now, suddenly.... the student discovers the "specifications" of the transistor and waves them at her instructor. But like a parrot who doesn't understand the words she squawks... she still gets it all wrong.

Well, for whatever it's worth, I took the trouble to shoot another video, since it's pretty clear that the student STILL does not grasp linear operation of a mosfet, nor does she understand voltage and current at the mosfet gate.... nor, in fact, the difference between oscillating DC and true AC.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6lLu7tvCZE

[TinselKoala]

Is it true that Ainslie has been blocked from even _reading_ this forum? That's really too bad. It means that she's been expelled, not just suspended, from yet another school where she could have learned much, if she only had the proper attitude.

On the one hand she claims that she's preparing for testing. Of course the "live streaming" isn't going to happen-- we all knew that was just an idle boast. But on the other hand.... it's clear from her rather glacial discussion with .99 on "FG Anatomy" that she still has no clue at all about how her circuit actually works. How is she even going to be able to put it all back together, I wonder, since she evidently cannot even read the simple diagrams .99 is using to try to explain to her what is happening.

And since she is completely ignoring my simple, clear videos that explain-- or at least illustrate-- the points where she is having difficulty, how is she going to have a conceptual framework within which to construct proper experimentation? She is not.

A main difficulty continues to be her misconception of the operation of transistors. She seems to think that there must be some CURRENT flowing in the gate for the mosfet to operate, like is true for bipolar transistors. And she seems to think that a mosfet is either OFF or ON, neglecting to realize that it has a linear operation region where it acts like a normal amplifier, quite linearly. And she still doesn't realize that it is the CHARGE on the mosfet's gate, regulated sensitively by small voltage changes, that controls the mosfet's drain-source channel and regulates the resistance of it. Nor does she understand that voltages just over THREE VOLTS are sufficient to turn the mosfet partially on in this linear response range.

She is hopelessly unequipped to understand how and why oscillations are happening in her circuit. She demands that .99 explain something that she is deliberately again misunderstanding, and she demands that he somehow stuff his explanation into her faulty conceptions, rather than the other way around as is proper. And if she is actually blocked from even _reading_ here... which would be a first, as far as I can tell.... that is just too bad, a major loss for her, because she now has no where AT ALL where she will see a contrary opinion and a correct rendering of the action of her circuit.