Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

TK,

I was thinking that was quite a bit of phase shift.  But, that is why one should always confirm measurements. 

Regarding the Ibatt versus Ibias, unless your DC ammeters are responding to the AC component, which some DC ammeters might might do with clipped or assymetrical AC waveforms, the DC currents should be the same.

The only DC path for Rload is by way of Q2's source and the bias supply/resistor (other than a very small gate leakage current).  At DC, the current should be the same measured anywhere in "the loop", unless there is a DC "sneak" path unaccounted for.

Have you ever attempted placing a cap across your Vbatt connections?

How do your dogs handle trips to the vet?

By the way, you sometimes do indeed provide a good chuckle...

PW

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: TinselKoala on April 21, 2012, 11:32:48 PM
Reposting what link? The one to your 25.6 million Joule calculation? The one to all the wrong things and lies you've made in the past three weeks?


How is my calculation wrong, Rosie Poser? Please enlighten us and SHOW YOUR WORK.

Do your own homework TK.  If you can't work it out one assumes picowatt would.  What's wrong with you all?  There's error after error after error and NOT ONE OF YOU ever notices.

Rosie

TinselKoala

@PW: They had fun. It's always an exciting outing and they usually get treats.


Apparently Rosemary doesn't yet understand how to measure current using a Current Viewing Resistor and an oscilloscope, even though I have posted the video showing exactly how to do it and comparing the reading with the Ohm's Law theoretical value as well as with two other meters.
Yet she refuses to say just exactly what's wrong with the method.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPVOkDQsXfs

The voltage drop across a current viewing resistor, Rosie Poser, is related to the current flowing through that resistor by Ohm's Law. I = V / R. So if you have a voltage across the resistor of 0.5 volts, and your resistor is 0.25 Ohms.... the current is I = 0.5 / 0.25 = 2.0 Amps. If you have a value of -2 volts, as you do in your scopeshot below, the current is -8 amps. That's the way it is, that's the way I calculated and once again you are wrong and easily refuted.




picowatt

TK,

I believe we are being reminded of the shunt's inductance.

PW

TinselKoala

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on April 21, 2012, 11:36:32 PM
Do your own homework TK.  If you can't work it out one assumes picowatt would.  What's wrong with you all?  There's error after error after error and NOT ONE OF YOU ever notices.

Rosie

Show us and explain, Rosie. You are talking to at least one active electronics bench professional, another who seems to be a retired one, and a few brilliant amateurs who all know a lot more about the subject than you do.

So enlighten us. Step by step. You  know I'd do it for you.