Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

TK,
That is a nice list of gear and software.  You must've skipped a few meals for all that!

With all that gear,  I think I would rather be out looking at the red planet tonight, than red text.

PW

That's exactly right. I went literally without my usual gourmet dinners for many months. The Megrez 90, all by itself, is worth twice as much as the blue book value of my car. The whole rig, all inclusive, is probably worth around 15K or so.

Have you got a telescope or two too?

[TinselKoala]

.99,

I think I see it now.  Will wait for your answer...

PW

I had the same problem at first until I understood what he was saying. The instantaneous values of course are determined by the sign of the current, since the battery voltage is always positive. But because of the waveshape's asymmetry around the "neutral line" as the battery oscillations decrease the _average_ across several waveforms can change sign.

[TinselKoala]

Guys - I was going to engage in a long argument related to TK's post numbers 644 and 643 - and have just gone over those points again.  I'll not answer him.  Those posts parade a level of disrespect and calumny that is not deserving of any attention at all.

I told you so. Full of something, but no answers "in full" to my points. Once again she has claimed something that she has not fulfilled.

(snip)

Kindest regards
Rosemary

You hypocrite. Your "kindest regards" are dripping with venom and are neither regards, nor kind. And your weak kneed ploy for sympathy doesn't wash with me. Loved ones die all the time, Rosemary, and the world keeps on turning. You will be just as wrong in "three weeks" as you are today and as you have been for the past ten years... during which time I have also lost several loved ones myself.
I shed one tear for you.

[TinselKoala]

Guys - I was going to engage in a long argument related to TK's post numbers 644 and 643 - and have just gone over those points again.  I'll not answer him.  Those posts parade a level of disrespect and calumny that is not deserving of any attention at all.

I am looking to spread the exposure of our demonstrations to more than just Harti's forum.  This because I cannot run the risk of having the thread  'flamed' - the data 'deleted' - nor the thread 'locked' before those tests are completed.  Harti's history in this respect has not been dependable. 

I absolutely guarantee that we'll exceed battery watt hour rating by a considerable margin on the re-run of our COP>17 test.  This to refute allegations of 'failure' by sundry replicators.  And I will also run the similar test against our NERD Q-array test.  This to test it's performance and thereby to test the allegations of 'failure' by TK.

While we will be demonstrating over unity - we do not claim this.  The thesis that predicted these results includes the possibility of a second energy supply source located in the 'bonding' material which is also proposed to be extraneous to the atomic structure.  While we KNOW that we can exceed the thermodynamic constraints on our COP>17 test - we can PROVE the thesis in our NERD Q-array test.  Therefore both tests are required.

In terms of a 'time line'.  Our best hope is to get the first tests up an running by early  May.  The only locale for this that will provide the required supervision of those tests - is at my house.  I need to set these tests up in our study.  At the moment our study - and indeed the entire house is crammed with 3 sets of furniture - for various reasons.  This has to be sorted, packed and shipped up country.  All of which will be completed by Wednesday of next week.  Then - for the first time I'll be able to set up our apparatus - ready for testing.  But even before I get there I have to iron out certain things.  I can't again afford to have my thread 'flamed to death' with the kind of calumny that TK et al - indulge.  And, ideally, we need to reach a wider audience than simply OU.com.  I've got lots of homework to do before I get started.  And I won't be 'rushed'.  I've depended on the good will of our open source community - in the past.  Its ranks, unfortunately, are also peppered with those who are rather anxious to deny our evidence.  And I've been well 'bitten'.  I don't intend making any further contributions unless that knowledge is well supported by good scientific argument and then carefully presented.  That way the results will be unequivocal.  It matters way more than catering to any impatient demands that we perform 'on demand'. 

But I'll get there.  Hopefully sooner rather than later.  And for those of you who are stressed because of the delays - then I apologise.  A large part of the hold up is that we've recently and sadly had two death's in our little family and I've been dealing with estate matters.  I've undertaken to inform Harti when I'm ready and he, in turn, has undertaken to give me a moderated thread.  And I expect my first posts in that thread will not be for another 3 weeks from today.  Maybe 2 - if things pan out smoothly.

Kindest regards
Rosemary

Look at that. Now she isn't even CONSIDERING testing the actual claim she's been making all this time. She's not even going to be testing THIS CIRCUIT but that other one claimed in the Quantum article, apparently. No simple battery drawdown tests of the so-called "Q-array" will be performed, JUST AS I HAVE PREDICTED ALL ALONG.

And she thinks that Stefan is "not dependable."

And you should see all the stuff that my house is stuffed with. I'll wager again that I have less room to move around in than poor old Rosie Poser.

Here's one more tear.


And good riddance to you, Poser. Good luck in finding another forum that will put up with your lies and ignorance.

[picowatt]

That's exactly right. I went literally without my usual gourmet dinners for many months. The Megrez 90, all by itself, is worth twice as much as the blue book value of my car. The whole rig, all inclusive, is probably worth around 15K or so.

Have you got a telescope or two too?

TK,

I wish.  I did have a 12" homemade truss Dobs, a 4" homemade refractor, and an 8" SCT with my old Canon A1 film camera for photo.  The 4" was a great planetary scope, but, believe it or not, the Dobs was my favorite for "just looking".  I bought the SCT primarily for photo work.

I sold the scopes about 11 years ago prior to a biz related move.  I wish now that I would have at least kept the Dobs mirror/mount and the 4" achromat.  Recently, and now that the world is "digital", I've been thinking about opening the lid on that money pit once again.  Somehow I managed to hang on to a set of eyepieces, but now, seems like 2" is the way to go.

Machine tools and test equipment always seem to be a priority.

PW