Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 89 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: picowatt on April 29, 2012, 12:15:22 AM
TK,

Are you going to use your bias source with its ground at the battery ground, as shown in .99's sim schematic which is identical to the March video?  Or are you going to connect the bias source ground to point 4 as per the schematic in the first paper?

PW


I can do either one.
However, I am TRYING to use the same points and the same circuit that Ainslie claims to produce her effect. We have asked several times for her to be SPECIFIC and CATEGORICAL and let us know the TRUE schematic. Since the one-mosfet circuit, the demo diagram shown in the demo, the actual demo circuit, the diagram in the first paper, and the diagram in the second paper are ALL DIFFERENT and none of them have been CORRECTED BY THE CLAIMANT (sorry, I have to shout to reach the peanut gallery evidently) it's still in question which one I should waste my time on.

I am using the diagram below, and my board incorporates the 555 timer circuit and the 555 inverting charge pump circuit, both of which can be disconnected by jumpers and either or both of which can be connected by jumpers in place of the FG or bias battery.

(I've also provisionally dumped the power resistors and installed a 0.2 ohm single actual CVR in place. If I can still get the negative power product I'll leave this one in place. If not I'll change back to the cement resistors.)

(There is also a 0.3 ohm CVR in series with the 10R at the "FG+" input point on the board. This can be used to view the current coming to or going from the FG or other bias source. According to Rosemary, this voltage drop should always be zero across this resistor, since no current flows through or from the FG in her circuit.)

picowatt

TK,

I watched the Mylow vid.  Rather than have the large disc permanent magnet motor driving the little motor with fishing line and then taking the output from the little motor and using its generated voltage to backdrive the wall wart to power your house, have you considered putting coils on the PM motor to generate directly?  Might be more efficient.

PW

TinselKoala

Quote from: picowatt on April 29, 2012, 12:26:38 AM
TK,

I watched the Mylow vid.  Rather than have the large disc permanent magnet motor driving the little motor with fishing line and then taking the output from the little motor and using its generated voltage to backdrive the wall wart to power your house, have you considered putting coils on the PM motor to generate directly?  Might be more efficient.

PW

Made my day. Now I can sleep easy, thank you....
;D

picowatt

Quote from: TinselKoala on April 29, 2012, 12:26:05 AM

I can do either one.
However, I am TRYING to use the same points and the same circuit that Ainslie claims to produce her effect. We have asked several times for her to be SPECIFIC and CATEGORICAL and let us know the TRUE schematic. Since the one-mosfet circuit, the demo diagram shown in the demo, the actual demo circuit, the diagram in the first paper, and the diagram in the second paper are ALL DIFFERENT and none of them have been CORRECTED BY THE CLAIMANT (sorry, I have to shout to reach the peanut gallery evidently) it's still in question which one I should waste my time on.

I am using the diagram below, and my board incorporates the 555 timer circuit and the 555 inverting charge pump circuit, both of which can be disconnected by jumpers and either or both of which can be connected by jumpers in place of the FG or bias battery.

TK,

So that would be identical to .99's sim schematic with the FG/bias source ground moved to point 4, which would make that sim schematic similar to the first paper schematic.  That way Ibias is accounted for by the CSR trace.

I knew you knew that.

PW

picowatt

TK,

Was the Tek manual link a good one for you?

PW