Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

We most certainly ARE using standard measurement protocols.
I would have no need to post if you own  posting, and your tests, and your attitude show some modicum of professionalism coupled with an earnest evaluation.  And when your comments and those of picowatt and MileHigh and FTC - no longer slander our work or my name.
I believe you've attempted to 'replicate our work'?  And that under the banner of the 'Tar Baby'?  Rest assured.  We will NEVER associate with such an unfortunate title and we will never endorse work that is so utterly unscientifically presented. 

Rosie Pose.

You lie yet again. You have no idea what "standard measurement protocols" are. How have you measured your battery's state of charge? With a  no-load voltmeter test. How have you decoupled your main power supply? Not at all. What kind of calorimetry have you done? None.

And ONCE AGAIN::: I don't care who you "care to associate" with. Tar Baby performs just like NERD in all significant respects and is READY TO PROVE IT NOW in comparison testing, side by side or REMOTELY with NERD NOW.

Can you perform even a single one of the demonstrations I've done with Tar Baby and show a different result from NERD? No, you cannot.

[TinselKoala]

Here. Just start with this one. Explain why it is right, or correct it, IN YOUR NEXT POST, or go away and play on the highway.

In any event it has now been running for 67 hours.  Therefore it's dissipated 10 x 60 x 60 x 67 = 2 412 000 watts. Sorry I've overstated this.  It's been running since Friday 10.30am therefore only 54 hours.  Therefore 1 944 000 watts dissipated. It's rated capacity is 60 ah's = 60 x 60 x 6 batteries @ 12 volts each = 1 296 000 watts. Technically it's already exceeded its watt hour rating at absolutely NO EVIDENT LOSS OF POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE.

If you make statements like this you should be expected to defend them.

Correct it or fly away, woman. You have no business posting in this thread if you can't even do simple math and you continue to confound your terminology.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Look here, Ainslie. I have certified documents that aliens from Alpha Ophiuchi 8 are living in Des Moines, Iowa and influencing the world's weather patterns from there, to make Earth more habitable for them.
I can't show you these documents or the notarized statements from all the academics who have seen them and agreed that they are authentic, because you would just claim that I invented them. So NO. It would be absurd to do so.

That's why I DON'T TALK about things I cannot prove, like my alien documents. And you must not speak of "endorsements" or such if you are not prepared to produce them. Because, you see... NOBODY WILL BELIEVE YOU, since you don't even correct your basic math errors when they are pointed out to you.

Actually TK - our justice system - those of us who live and work under democracies (and with the possible exception of Italy) BELIEVE what is stated unless and until they are PROVED TO BE FALSE.  We BELIEVE in the presentations of papers unless they're proven to be fraudulent.  In the same way those of us who are in any way fair minded BELIEVE in innocence until proven otherwise.

We are inordinately PROUD of our work in those papers.  With good reason. As we've also had those that compliment on our work.  Indeed it is also a compliment in a strange way - when you 'disparage' that work.  I'd be sorry that such esteemed academics would - in any way - endorse your own opinions.  They'd be 'blackened' 'tarred' by association.

Rosie Pose

[Rosemary Ainslie]

If you make statements like this you should be expected to defend them.


Correct it or fly away, woman. You have no business posting in this thread if you can't even do simple math and you continue to confound your terminology.

Why must I answer this AGAIN?  I've already done so.  You know this full well.  And why do you tell me to play in the highway?  WHICH highway?  And why?  I don't play - anywhere - unless its a hand a bridge, scrabble - or, latterly, sudoku.  What highway?  I don't even know what this means.

Rosie Pose
added.

[TinselKoala]

Guys - TK needs to address some serious and slanderous allegations before he can expect any kind of engagement.

I can prove everything I've ever said about you, from the willfull ignorance to the scrawny wench, most of it in your own words and images. Every lie you've told about your work, about the posts of others, and about me is documented in my database. Why do you think I come up with IMAGES AND QUOTES so quickly when you commit another egregious mendacity? I've got the evidence and proof for everything I've ever said about you right here.
Meanwhile, you need to prove that I am... as YOU have called ME... a criminal psychopath like Hitler, Mussolini, and Savonarola, who is even shorter than Hitler, and so on and so forth, denigrating MY education when you have none, and you have made physical threats against me, even saying that you would "kill two birds with one stone, one being TK...". And now you slanderously talk about my "slander". You are a hypocrite of the finest water; it is your chief distinguishing characteristic, right next to your classic paranoia.