Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

TK said,

It's a little scary when I see that a video I've posted gets some few views even before I've posted a link to it. Gratifying but a little scary anyway. I could never handle fame, not even fifteen seconds much less fifteen minutes of it.

And Ainslie interjected,

Guys,
This post has got me rolling.  What a pleasure to find something to laugh at.  It's hilarious.
It seems that our little Leon is rather frightened at the prospect of FAME which he thinks is imminent.  Golly.  Could someone please assure him him that there's no chance of this.  Unless of course it's in the context of a DR VEST. 

Regards,
Rosemary

And this demonstrates once again that Ainslie apparently cannot read or understand English sentences-- or rather CHOOSES to bloviate, lie and misrepresent whenever she can. Where in my statement do I say or imply that I think FAME is imminent?  Rather, say that I think that someone is waiting for my videos and is watching them as soon as they appear. This, I do find slightly scary. It has nothing to do with FAME, which is clearly Ainslie's goal. Rather, it has to do with my desire to protect myself and those close to me from IDIOT THREATS that I've received from people like Ainslie.

And all this has to do with the subject matter of the video REFUTING AINSLIE'S CLAIMS YET AGAIN..... just how? Not at all. Ainslie seeks once again to divert attention from the major issues: The circuit makes NEGATIVE MEAN POWER measurements using other transistors than the IRFPG50, and the circuit DOES INDEED draw current from the bias source.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And guys - another 'red alert' to yet more misdirections.

TK,

The first and last look like FIG 3 and FIG 4 in the first paper with the same Q1 issue (same date/time stamp as well).  RA's circuit is different than yours.  Her Q1 works in some 'scope captures, and not so much in others.  Yours always works, unless you disconnect or damage your Q1.  I see she continues to cling to the same "Q2 can't pass current therefore its a marvelous mystery" claim. 

PW

In our second test we simply and deliberately adjust the settings and use this to show you that notwithstanding the high input during the on period we still measure a COP INFINITY.  What picowatt is 'spinning' or 'tarring' is the implication that we cannot adjust those settings.  Be cautioned.  It's just more 'tarring' with that tar brush.  And we all know why.

Regards,
Rosemary

[picowatt]

And guys - as for this...

Again - a direct contradiction with the implication that picowatt 'KNOWS whereof he speaks'.  Like he KNOWS that the Source at Q2 is in series with the 'ground' of the battery supply? ? ?

Picowatt - I have EXPLAINED why it is NOT CONSIDERED SAFE PRACTICE to expose our LeCroy to ESKOM's POWER SURGES.  Do with that information what you will.  But unless you concede this then you will ALWAYS BE WRONG.   And while I'm at it...  Tell us again why it is that that the Source Leg of Q2 is connected in series with the source supply's negative rail?  WHERE exactly?

Rosemary

You have "explained" nothing.

More misquoting I see.

The source of Q2 is connected to the negative rail (or CSR) through the function generator.

The gate of Q2 and the source of Q1 are connected to the non-battery end of the CSR and can therefore NEVER be at any potential other than the potential indicated by the CSR trace, which is near ground potential, particularly with respect to DC (below the Vgs required for turn on).  When the FG output is a positive voltage, a positive voltage is applied to the gate of Q1 and Q1 turns on (except as noted in your FIG 3 where the Q1 is not functioning).  Q2 is off during this phase.

When the FG output is a negative voltage, a negative voltage (i.e., more negative than the batt-) is applied to the source of Q2 and a DC current flows through Q2 and the function generator to the CSR (or batt- if that is where the FG common is connected, as in the March video).  Q1 is off during this phase.

The DC current flow thru Q2, that is, Ibias, is limited to around 200ma plus or minus 50ma or so by the action of the applied negative voltage from the FG, the Rgen=50R, and the turn on voltage of Q2, which biases Q2 into a linear region of operation.

PW

[TinselKoala]

Really, PW, is that what you are implying? That Ainslie can't adjust her settings? Funny, I didn't get that at all from your posts. Could you show me where you are implying that Ainslie can't adjust her settings?

[MileHigh]

Rosemary:

I am simply anxious to advise our readers why it is that the GROUND PIN of our PLUGS are required.  And why it is that without the GROUND PIN we will be exposing that machine to UNDUE RISK.

PW just explained this stuff to you and your skull is too thick and it did not sink in.  Having the ground pin connected does not protect the machine in any way against surges.  By the way, just go buy a surge protector for your expensive equipment.

The ground pin is there to prevent you from getting electrocuted.  That's what it is there for, it's not there to protect the equipment like you state above.

One more time, another ASSUMPTION that you make out of pure ignorance is wrong.  You navigate though this whole project about half of the time based on your ASSUMPTIONS due to your lack of experience and education.  For most of the ASSUMPTIONS that you make, you don't have a clue if they are right or wrong.

Face it Rosemary, a lot of what you do to navigate through this electronics maze is just "purple haze" screaming in your brain.  You just hope and cross your fingers that you are right and a substantial percentage of the time you are dead wrong.  It's going to be quite a barrel of monkeys when you take the plunge into the purple haze and try to do a new round of experiments.  I am anticipating that you will not ask for help even though you know that we would be glad to respond to your questions.

MileHigh