Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 58 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

Rosemary:

The Wikipedia entries explain the difference between power and energy.  What is wrong with you?

You apparently don't understand how ridiculous you have made yourself look here.  I just don't know what to do.

MileHigh

Rosemary Ainslie

My dear TK
Regarding this statement...

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 12, 2012, 02:45:55 PM
One day you will be made to regret that you uttered that little libellous claim, Ainslie, along with the physical threats you have made against me. They are all recorded and you cannot edit my database.
Bring it on TK.  As you put it.  I cannot tell how how much I'd enjoy this.  You GROSSLY underestimate my commitment if you think that I would avoid a legal confrontation with you.  If I had by now established you IP address you'd have physical proof of this.  You have NO IDEA how I long for it.  If your thread here serves our purposes - how much more so would a COURT ACTION.  It would be a considerably more public arena for us to demonstrate our apparatus.  And it would have the advantage of expert and credentialed OPINION rather than those of your 'team'.  And then there would be the very real advantage of making you entirely accountable for your criminal levels of slander and traducement. Long overdue.  If you want to serve the first shot - then PM me and I'll send you a service address.

And the pity of your data base is that YOU most CERTAINLY have edited it.  I see evidence of it in those multiple references you make to our work.

Rosie Pose

TinselKoala

QuoteAnd the pity of your data base is that YOU most CERTAINLY have edited it.  I see evidence of it in those multiple references you make to our work.

PROVE IT. With references of course.

You cannot. Did I edit THIS, for example?
QuoteBubba you're getting tedious in the extreme.   Much more important is that you answer your earlier concern that a battery can deliver a negative current flow - which seems to be something you really CAN endorse.  Somehow? 

Correctly it is one Joule per second - but since 1 watt = 1 Joule and since 1 Joule = 1 watt per second - then AS I'VE EXPLAINED EARLIER - the terms are INTERCHANGEABLE. Which is ALSO explained in WIKI.

I'm not going to answer any more of your posts Bubba.  They're getting too tedious.  And they've got absolutely NOTHING to do with the topic.

Rosemary

Now, if 1 watt = one Joule, and if 1 Joule = 1 watt per second...and the terms are INTERCHANGEABLE,  THEN AS I'VE EXPLAINED EARLIER, that means that you could substitute the Watt for the Joule in any equation, like this:

  1 Watt = 1 Watt Per Second.

Got that, Polly?


TinselKoala

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 12, 2012, 03:12:49 PM
My dear TK
Regarding this statement...
Bring it on TK.  As you put it.  I cannot tell how how much I'd enjoy this.  You GROSSLY underestimate my commitment if you think that I would avoid a legal confrontation with you.  If I had by now established you IP address you'd have physical proof of this.  You have NO IDEA how I long for it.  If your thread here serves our purposes - how much more so would a COURT ACTION.  It would be a considerably more public arena for us to demonstrate our apparatus.  And it would have the advantage of expert and credentialed OPINION rather than those of your 'team'.  And then there would be the very real advantage of making you entirely accountable for your criminal levels of slander and traducement. Long overdue.  If you want to serve the first shot - then PM me and I'll send you a service address.

And the pity of your data base is that YOU most CERTAINLY have edited it.  I see evidence of it in those multiple references you make to our work.

Rosie Pose

Please note everybody: I am being physically threatened -- AGAIN -- by a madwoman from South Africa.

TinselKoala

Now, I really think we should get back to the topic of the thread, which Polly Parrot is trying to derail, which is Testing the TK Tar Baby.l.

Ainslie made this claim, in a response to PW, I believe:

QuoteWhat you are trying to do is to get me to believe that a function generator is able to pass current from a battery supply source via its terminal to its probe. Since I KNOW that is is impossible I'm afraid I'm not receptive to you trying to teach me or anyone else.  So NO.  I spare me your 'lessons'.

And TK responded thusly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuBWVmRmUtc


Compare, contrast, conclude.