Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

More thoughts on this:

I am being 'nice' here by using the term 'inference' because of the DSO data.

However, thinking about it a bit more you in fact can conclusively state that the batteries are discharging because of the measured current flow.  It goes back to the chemical reactions inside the batteries.  The 'potential pump' in the batteries is pushing electrons out of the negative terminal and into the positive terminal.  This current flow is caused by a net one-directional chemical reaction.  Therefore net current flow in one direction means net chemical reactions in one direction - the two things are tied together.  So net chemical reactions in one direction by definition means that the batteries are discharging.

MileHigh

That's right. The overwhelming evidence from the NERD data in the scopeshots is that, during the positive gate pulse mode when there is a functioning mosfet, there is significant current flow, depending on the battery voltage, of anywhere from about 2 amps (48 volt battery) to quite a bit higher with the 72 volt battery.
Since this current magnitude is directly related to the battery voltage.... and since there is no other explanation offered for this current flow.... and since conventional circuit analysis predicts this current flow with the battery as its source...  and when the battery is "removed" or disconnected as Ainslie calls it during the LO portion of a gate drive pulsation.... this current stops flowing...
the hypothesis that this current is NOT coming from the battery is not supported by the data and is in fact falsified. This current comes from the battery! And there still might be some admixture from the bias supply too.
To use any of this scope data as support for a battery non-discharge claim is untenable. All the data shows is that the battery DOES discharge.

Ainslie has even OBSERVED a voltage drop during an experiment and reported it on this forum.

(She also appears to have confirmed that the FG used was an Isotech (also branded INSTEK) FG with the correct part number.)

[WilbyInebriated]

if you look at the foundation of your sciences you will find tautology there as well... they just call them axioms.

[fuzzytomcat]

I have already told you this TK.  I am not at ALL interested in anything that you claim about anything at all, LEAST of all related to this tinsecoil thing.  I have NO idea what it is.  And I have NO intention of finding out.  It would BORE me - at BEST.  And TK.  My name is ROSEMARY or ROSIE or ROSIE POSE  or ROSIE POSIE.  My name is NOT Ainslie.  I am NOT your 'pal' or your 'colleague' that you can be that familiar with my family.  Persist if you must - but then you extend this quarrel of ours to a FAR, FAR, wider platform.  I'm not sure that you're fully aware of its extent.  And I seriously caution you that it takes your calumny to new levels of abuse together with a far wider circle that will clamour for your retraction.  But suit yourself.

Rosie Pose

Rosie Pose

I agree that "POSE" is a great choice ... we all can agree on.

"POSE" is something that guests and members viewing any of Rosemary's postings signed as "POSE" will know it's nothing more than word salads that Ainslie serves daily, and can be easily chewed or eaten with nicotine stained wooden dentures.

That's it .... "POSE" .... a winner of hers finally !! 

[TinselKoala]

She's ashamed to be called by her surname? Astounding. Does she sign her "paper" submissions "Rosie Poseur"? Perhaps she should.
I refuse to call someone who hates my guts and wouldn't piss on my face if my beard was on fire.... by her cute little nickname.

Among Koalas, since we all have the same surname, it doesn't matter if you call us Koala, or by the baptismal name. Tinsel, in my case. I'll bet you didn't know that many Koalas are Catholic. Look around you, the next time you go to evening Mass. Look carefully.... the person sitting next to you just might be a Koala. In drag, of course.

[WilbyInebriated]

She's ashamed to be called by her surname? Astounding. Does she sign her "paper" submissions "Rosie Poseur"? Perhaps she should.
I refuse to call someone who hates my guts and wouldn't piss on my face if my beard was on fire.... by her cute little nickname.

how quickly you forget post hoc, ergo propter hoc when it suits you... again, tu stultus es! nowhere has she claimed she is "ashamed to be called by her surname".  reasons were given that have nothing to do with shame... you can read and comprehend can't you? this is just more of you and yours continued ridiculous hyperbole.