Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

With reference to SCRN0342, here is what she says about it, in part:

Therefore, conservatively speaking we were able to take water to boil at 0.12 watts of energy measured from the battery supply during this short 18 parts 'on' of every 82 parts off of each period of the duty cycle.

The link to the post:
http://www.overunity.com/10407/rosemary-ainslie-circuit-demonstration-on-saturday-march-12th-2011/msg287455/#msg287455

And below are the images of the post itself, and the SCRN0342 for your own analyses of the power level during this "short 18 parts 'on' " portion of each period.
Just eyeballing it without blowing it up it looks to me like 0.090 V is indicated on the CVR trace during the short 18 parts 'on' portions. Using the DC resistance of the CVR, which is 0.25 Ohms, we obtain

0.090 V / 0.25 R == 0.360 A

And then using the battery voltage (measured from the trace, not from the boxes) we obtain the steady DC power in that interval:

0.360 A x 60 V == 21.6 Watts

And even if you multiply that by the duty cycle and assume no contribution from the oscs, you still get 21.6 x 0.18 == about 3.9 Watts.

Both are different results than Ainslie reports.

What accounts for the difference? Is it really my profound lack of math or my misunderstanding of power calculations? Really? I think it is libellous for her to accuse me of those things without providing calculations of her own to refute me. And I am experiencing profound distress and emotional anguish from it. It has already cost me thousands of dollars. And I have receipts from the bars to prove it.

(Just documenting, for the punitive and compensatory damages, you understand.)

And... by the way.... the water was NOT boiling, according to her original report made at the time the experiment was done.
This is documented in her blog posts 117 and 118, to which I have linked previously.

[TinselKoala]

By the way.... in case there is actually any doubt in anyone's mind.... every one of those screenshots in the zip file came from Ainslie's blog or one of the locked threads on this forum, and they are reproduced and gathered together as an educational service to those who are working on this OPEN SOURCE project. There are a couple of blowups with notes that I made and these are of course freely donated, copy-lefted and with source attribution of course.

And this is something that Ainslie herself should have done long ago.

And further.... any attempt by her to remove or suppress these scopeshots or this collection is... well...... suppression, isn't it.

I'm sure you all can Do The Math (tm Ainslie).

[TinselKoala]

And, Rosemary, tomorrow there'll be another very modest website to encourage members of your team to identify themselves and engage directly. I don't think responses filtered through you are helpful.

What's the website going to be called?


(It looks like soundofcricketschirping.com is still available.....)

[TinselKoala]

Wow, and of course you know that Saturn gives off EM radiation because of the shoulder-to-shoulder Zipons circulating around it in an agitated state of imbalance.

Very cool, I hope you enjoyed that Jupiter transit behind the sun.

Heh.... yes, that was quite a video, very impressive indeed. I forgot to thank you for that one but I did bookmark it. It must be nice to have billions of dollars worth of kit to make your photos with.

That Saturn is a "personal best" for Saturn for me. It's a hard target. That shot is an "eyepiece projection" using the Baader Hyperion 3.5 mm EP (edit, it wasn't the zoom after all), in the Celestron EdgeHD 9.25 aplanatic Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope on the Celestron CGEM German equatorial mount. The image is a single jpeg, not a stack, taken with the Canon Xti at ISO 1600, 2 sec exposure. It was processed initially in PixInsightLE and then tweaked a bit more in the gimp. Still... it is in the nature of a "proof". I have a bunch of other frames in the Canon's higher-pixel-depth .CR2 format that I will try to use in a stacking process that may improve the overall image quite a bit if it works. You can see an example of this process and the amazing improvement it can provide in this astronomy video showing the process applied to Jupiter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2peHMc3wHs

[evolvingape]

What's the website going to be called?


(It looks like soundofcricketschirping.com is still available.....)

How about theguysclassactionlawsuit.com ?

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/class+action

a legal action undertaken by one or more people representing the interests of a large group of people with the same grievance