Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

My dear little TKUnfortunately this can ONLY be claimed by referencing those publications.  Otherwise we'll all assume - YET AGAIN - that you're fraudulently alleging what you should be proving.

You accuse me of some kind of "fraudulent alleging" YET AGAIN? Just where are you claiming fraud on my part? Let's be sure to preserve this for your attorneys, shall we. WHAT IS THE REFERENCE to this fraud of mine you are alleging, you liar?  Just like your laboratory, idiot Little Miss Mosfet, just LIKE YOUR UNNAMED LABORATORY and your phony endorsements-- which is very much in keeping with your style. NEVER giving a checkable reference for YOUR CLAIMS OF ENDORSEMENTS at all. You have no grounds to criticise me, you miserable scribbler. You, by claiming prize money based on your bogus claims of overunity and COP INFINITY, are indeed engaging in FRAUD because you are trying to profit monetarily from your lies and errors.

Which is very much in keeping with your style.  I look forward to the time that we all know your identity TK.  Then perhaps we can all learn to admire you with the same fervour that you manage.  Unless and until - sadly - we all KNOW you to be a malicious bully and like all bullies - a coward.

Ainslie, every day we hear stories about people who have bad things happen to them because somebody ON THE INTERNET knew their real identity. You have threatened me with physical harm and you are manifestly mentally unstable. Even though you are a world away, I still think you are crazy enough to try to harm me or my property or my family or my employer. I'm no coward-- I have offered TIME AND TIME AGAIN to have my claims tested side by side with yours at any time anywhere. YOU, you coward, have always refused even to consider it, because YOU KNOW YOU ARE WRONG AND I AM RIGHT.

You're incapable of original thought which also means you'd have nothing to publish.

My, you are an ignoramus. My research-based publications are indeed original and my line of research actually started some things that are all around you and becoming more prevalent every day. You could never grasp what they are, but I'll tell you this much: they involved sophisticated mathematical models and a lot of real computer programming, you ignorant person who cannot even operate a calculator correctly, as well as YEARS of laboratory experimentation. In addition, Ainslie you educationally challenged ignoramus, I have taught my subjects at the college level and am considered an excellent teacher by my students and my supervisors. You are an ignorant, uneducated, arrogant fool and you are not only insulting me but you are also insulting my teachers, some of whose names even you might recognise. You, on the other hand, think you've learned your physics from "The Dancing Wu Li Masters". I laugh at your bloviation and attempts at dragging me down. You know nothing of academia and your every encounter with truly educated persons results in them laughing at you and discarding your "work" into the garbage where it belongs.

And your statements in this thread prove you to be considerably less than professional.  No-one - not even your little gang of 'like minded' could pretend that you know the meaning of the term.   

Kindest regards notwithstanding,
Rosie Pose

Lying hypocrite Ainslie. It matters not one whit whether you think I am "professional" or not. What matters is THAT YOU ARE NOT and will never be. And that your junk manuscripts contain unsupported claims, distortions, error after error, and outright LIES, like your 5.9 megaJoule claim and your references to "boiling water" when THE WATER WASN'T ACTUALLY BOILING. Things like that Really Do Matter, Ainslie, lying hypocrite.
Your blinkered view of my professionalism is not at issue here..... what is important is that YOU, Ainslie, are WRONG, pitifully so, and ANYONE who builds and tests what you claim to be your apparatus can and will discover that for themselves.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And so it goes.  TK trying to allege he's professional - picowatt pretending to understand anything at all - MileHigh propagandising about anything rather than science - all of them desperate. 

Nice to see that level of anxiety.  If I didn't know better I'd say they're FRANTIC to deny our choice proof of energy efficiency.  Because IF there's no proof as they allege - then WHO WOULD CARE?   LOL

Rosie Pose

[TinselKoala]

Picowatt asked,

So, the question is why, with all the discussion and data she has been provided, has she merely moved on to a new "forum" and continued to push her papers and circuit as though there are no logical explanations regarding its operation and measurements, and done nothing to correct or verify the errors that have been pointed out to her?

This is the exact same thing that has happened several times before; the unique part of this present instance is that she hasn't gotten herself  banned here before moving on, in spite of her best efforts.

You can read almost word-for-word posts, objections, claims and replies, in the old forums that Fuzzy linked a few posts ago. Over and over it's the same. The only differences are Altoid, Tar Baby and the Dim Bulb Tests, and _finally_ somebody actually tried running on suitable capacitors.

Why? What's the answer? It lies deep in Ainslie's psychology. It's called the Dunning-Kruger effect. For whatever reason, her need to defend her ego is so strong that rational argument cannot penetrate, and whenever events or facts become so obtrusive that it is impossible to ignore them, she ignores them anyway, tries to sweep them under the rug of pages of bloviation and diversion, even resorting to insults and trollish baiting in order to avoid the real discussion of issues -- as we have seen MANY times in this thread alone.  Why does a person develop this astounding level of ego defense? It's generally the result of deep hurt or disappointment in life. Perhaps Ainslie lost someone close to her early on and has been in mourning ever since, feeling abandoned yet guilty as survivors often do. These things happen to all of us but not everybody reacts the same way. As a natively bright child, Ainslie no doubt had a lot of difficulty in traditional schools, and she left that system to pursue some kind of alternative "education"... which obviously studiously avoided any kind of math or critical thinking instruction or practice. Her present lack of respect for hard work and education is typical of the under-challenged but bright child who never had to struggle to earn a living.

Due to the tolerance of our host and the discussions we have all had, we've been able to avoid banning Ainslie, but that hasn't prevented her from trying to shore up Yet Another soapbox forum to attract a few innocent sycophants. There's a major problem though.... anybody who is smart enough to build and test her thing is also smart enough to see through it eventually. Even Ashtweth and Aaron eventually saw the light-- that there was only darkness in Ainslie's soul, no COP > unity.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

You accuse me of some kind of "fraudulent alleging" YET AGAIN?

Yes.

Rosie Pose.

[MileHigh]

Rosemary your refusal to simply concede your mistakes and try to learn so you won't make them again says it all.

There is no desperation on our part.  Just because you say it doesn't make it so.  On the other side, we can back up what we say with facts, reason, and measurements.

The best case scenario for you would be a report back from the lab that says that you have nothing.  It has to say that if they are real.  If Sterling hooked you up with somebody in his network then things will be quite interesting.  If you get an endorsement from somebody that hasn't a clue what they are doing that would be comical.  Remember Sterling's trip to South Africa along with a "technical consultant?"  The two of them stared at a box filled with batteries and a motor and a generator and some relays for 60 minutes and were "convinced" that they saw a free energy machine.

Sometimes the realm of free energy is like an old British Black Comedy.  "The Man in the White Suit" is a good one.