Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello MileHigh,

I am just highlighting this example of your abysmal heart-sinking sheer stupidity.  It's stupidity in this case because you have no excuse, you have been working with oscilloscopes for years.

In your fantasies about your proposition Rosemary you are "serious" and you have a "thesis" and you have an "experiment" with "measurements."

Yet the quotes above clearly show that you are just a clueless, ignorant, and stupid bungling fool without a clue what you are doing.  And the reason that you are getting a hard time from me because you don't even understand AC coupling vs. DC coupling for an oscilloscope is precisely because of the pretense that you put forward that you are "serious."

Like I said before, you, and your entire proposition is an insult to the disciplines of science and engineering.  You make a mockery of them and expose yourself as an incompetent fool.

You are not fooling anybody and the higher you pretend to position yourself the harder you deserve to be put back in your place.  Your place is behind a table at a Grade Six science fair showing your pulsing coil and nowhere else.

And your pretense where you try to pretend experts like PW are stupid is pathetic, especially when you take in the context as outlined above.

It's just a tragicomic farce at this point in time.  You are NOT ever going to rub shoulders with electrical engineering PhD's Rosemary - the best you can hope for is a pat on the head from a parent visiting your display that you made with your 12-year-old classmate.  That's the level you are at - Grade Six.

You have made a complete fool of yourself and you insult and make a mockery of science and engineering.  Well, science and engineering are fighting back.

I detect a certain censure here MiliHigh?  Whatever next?  I thought you approved of me. 

A man with a certain gift for prose
Complained when things got up his nose
Especially as they referred to those
Outrageous claims by Rosie Pose

added?

[TinselKoala]

@TK

As someone who's spent a good chunk of the weekend tearing out my hair transferring VM's around, I'm content to give the benefit of the doubt.


I want to make it as easy as possible for RA to share the data she has committed to sharing, no strings.

I wish you luck. Keep us posted, will you, as to the progress of the negotiations.

Although, you and I both know that if it were MY data you were requesting in this manner.... you'd have it all in a couple of hours, without any possibility of loss or file corruption, and it would take either one of us about five minutes to describe how to do this transfer to any ten-year-old child with a toy laptop.

Just a few clicks and then there appears, as if by magic.... a spreadsheet.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Do you mean through this forum, or to a different address?


If you email me at

  seandata (at) seani (dot) justemail (dot) net


you can send the details in the same way. I will respect the privacy of the email address you use and any address information you pass on, irrespective of the content of the email.

No Sean.  YOU email me.  My email is ainslie@mweb.co.za. I'll then give you an address where you can send your own flash drive.  And then I'll upload? is that the term - or in any event - I'll transfer the information from my flash drive to yours.  Then I'll ship this back to you.

Rosie Pose

[TinselKoala]

No Sean.  YOU email me.  My email is ainslie@mweb.co.za. I'll then give you an address where you can send your own flash drive.  And then I'll upload? is that the term - or in any event - I'll transfer the information from my flash drive to yours.  Then I'll ship this back to you.

Rosie Pose

DING!

And... Round 1 goes to Ainslie.

The requester needs to go to extraordinary lengths to obtain a simple file transfer from someone who regularly loses and corrupts data, has her computers hacked into, her photobuckets rifled......

And a process that should only take a few minutes is consigned to snail mail to the antipodes, which will cover up the data for another several WEEKS, assuming that it gets sent at all.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary, I am simply posting a link on useful information and facts on the differences between AC and DC coupling in reference to the use of an oscilloscope.

Sorry the link doesn't work for you. It works for me.

I can get no more videos that are uploaded on this forum.  AT ALL.  EVER.  They've all been put out of reach.  I guess it's some editorial comment applied by one of my fans here.  There are so many of them.

Rose, every wave form has a DC component. The DC component is "0V" when the wave form is exactly symmetrical, such as would be the case with a 50% duty cycle square wave or sine wave, and the OFFSET is also set to "0V".

I'm not talking about a pure square wave Poynty Point.  I'm talking about the signal - however varied - as applied to those gates.  They're AC.  NOT DC.  And the coupling is only the optional point on the LeCroy to nominate the required zero reference.

With reference to a MOSFET Gate drive, the absolute voltage level is paramount to know. Remember that it is the Gate-to-Source voltage that determines the Drain-to-Source behaviour (ON-characteristic) of the MOSFET. The Gate-to-Source voltage is unipolar (positive for N-channel), which means the Gate drive is actually pulsed-DC (a DC voltage that is ON and OFF), with some associated duty cycle.

I don't follow this.  Whatever the polarity of the signal at Q1 - it is the opposite at Q2. That's NEVER pure DC. 

Regards again
Rosie