Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 78 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 26, 2012, 01:51:36 AM
Post away, I don't have to tell you jack cheese about me or my students or my supervisors. The issue here, remember, lying Ainslie, is that YOU ARE LYING ABOUT YOUR WORK, withholding data, and making false claims. Who and what you think I am is no concern of yours.... my work is repeatable by anyone who cares to do it. YOURS.... well, the data is, but of course the CLAIMS are bogus and anyone who looks will find that  out.... whether or not I have one student, many, or none.

No little TK.  Not actually.  It is you who are misrepresenting and it is my opinion that this so called 'hobby' of yours is also rather well funded.  I look forward to the proof that will be abundant - and then I think your little thread here will go down in INFAMY - as PRECISELY the prejudice that prevented earlier proof of all this energy efficiency.  Just think about TK.  You'll be famous and YET no-one will know your name.  LOL

Rosie Pose

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: Magluvin on June 26, 2012, 01:59:47 AM
Most all batteries are rechargeable. Its just how to do so is not commonly known.
Alkaline can be charged but only if not allowed to get hot as the casing wont hold the pressure of internal expansion. So giving them a rest then charging off and on till full works.
But if no abnormal heat is created in the battery, most all can be charged.
So that reasoning doesnt work here Rose.

Mags

My dear Mags,
It does not take undue skill nor is it unduly expensive to apply a rechargeble battery to a test.  And without that rechargeable battery one can HARDLY expect a recharge benefit.  And IF one is testing whether a recharge cycle actually RECHARGES - it would be advisable to FIRST apply a rechargeable battery.  It's really quite simple.

Rosie

TinselKoala

Ainslie, your input would be welcomed if you would answer the questions asked of you, give constructive criticisms about things where you demonstrate competence, shared your data or POSTED YOUR OWN TEST RESULTS. But you do none of those things. Look at the first post in this thread.
You continue to lie, misrepresent, insult, avoid dealing with issues, and all the rest. You aren't even qualified to comment on the other things that PW and MileHigh and I are discussing in this thread, yet you insult and bloviate about them anyway. You are, as MH says, the very epitome of an internet troll.

Now.... if you cannot provide constructive criticism about something you know about, then yes.... you are to be censured, although not censored. Have you wondered why you haven't been banned, in spite of your best conscious efforts? It's because there's a conspiracy to NOT ban you.

;D

TinselKoala

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 26, 2012, 02:04:36 AM
My dear Mags,
It does not take undue skill nor is it unduly expensive to apply a rechargeble battery to a test.  And without that rechargeable battery one can HARDLY expect a recharge benefit.  And IF one is testing whether a recharge cycle actually RECHARGES - it would be advisable to FIRST apply a rechargeable battery.  It's really quite simple.

Rosie

Ainslie, what do you think those six, 5 amphour sealed LEAD ACID BATTERIES are that I've been using for Tar Baby to make the negative mean power product and the negative energy integral and the Dim Bulb tests and the spreadsheet integrations? Chopped liver? You are truly flailing about like a fish out of water.
All batteries are rechargeable, anyway!!

TinselKoala

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 26, 2012, 02:01:09 AM
No little TK.  Not actually.  It is you who are misrepresenting and it is my opinion that this so called 'hobby' of yours is also rather well funded.  I look forward to the proof that will be abundant - and then I think your little thread here will go down in INFAMY - as PRECISELY the prejudice that prevented earlier proof of all this energy efficiency.  Just think about TK.  You'll be famous and YET no-one will know your name.  LOL

Rosie Pose

Let's see.... I am in a garage or basement with a bunch of junk equipment and no room in one post, and I'm rather well funded in my "hobby" in quotes in another post. Like all liars, you cannot be consistent.

I'm already famous among people who do know my name, so I don't care what you think about me at all. You, on the other hand, will be truly famous, as you will be immortalized as a case study in my next book.