Testing the TK Tar Baby

[picowatt]

Fair question.  I edited my post.

R

You may post this "over there":

In FIG3 of the first paper, during the portion of the function generator (FG) cycle wherein the FG output is a positive voltage, approximately +12 volts is indicated as being applied to the gate of Q1.  All will surely agree that this voltage applied to the gate of Q1 should turn Q1 fully on.  However, during the same portion of the cycle, the CSR trace does not indicate the current flow that would be expected if Q1 were turned fully on.

As well, FIG7 also indicates that during the same portion of the cycle sufficient gate drive is again being applied to Q1 to turn it on, and again no subsequent current flow is being indicated by the CSR trace.

This can only mean that Q1 is not functioning or is not connected as per the schematic.

Curiously, in FIG5, less gate drive is being applied to Q1 than is indicated in FIG3 and FIG7, yet the CSR trace indicates current flow as one would expect.

Why is Q1 not turning on in FIG3 and FIG7? 

[TinselKoala]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBJqPxpWD5w

Many people have asked Ainslie for the data for this open source project that pretends to have "journal papers" (for which RAW DATA IS ALWAYS MADE AVAILABLE to whomever asks for it, in the real world of journal publications), even Stefan our good host. She always has said she would provide it, and she never has.

When someone continually says she will do things and it continually turns out NOT TO BE TRUE.... then that person is a LIAR, by definition, plain and simple. And of course she lies in every other way as well: by making claims that are not supportable by data, by "disappearing" some of those ridiculous claims instead of publicly retracting them, by allowing multiple uncorrected versions of her manuscript to continue to be posted, by not acknowledging the work of others, by making false mathematical calculations and conclusions, by misrepresenting the words and the work of others, by making ridiculous paranoid accusations and threats, and so on.

Now it's to "registered laboratories" whatever that means.

What I think it really means is that she has no clue about the data, probably cannot even open spreadsheet files (or she would have been misrepresenting mine) and perhaps even that the data is lost.

Certainly it means that the data is unavailable for critical inspection, now or ever.

IN STARK CONTRAST to Fuzzy's data, for example.

[fuzzytomcat]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBJqPxpWD5w

Many people have asked Ainslie for the data for this open source project that pretends to have "journal papers" (for which RAW DATA IS ALWAYS MADE AVAILABLE to whomever asks for it, in the real world of journal publications), even Stefan our good host. She always has said she would provide it, and she never has.

When someone continually says she will do things and it continually turns out NOT TO BE TRUE.... then that person is a LIAR, by definition, plain and simple. And of course she lies in every other way as well: by making claims that are not supportable by data, by "disappearing" some of those ridiculous claims instead of publicly retracting them, by allowing multiple uncorrected versions of her manuscript to continue to be posted, by not acknowledging the work of others, by making false mathematical calculations and conclusions, by misrepresenting the words and the work of others, by making ridiculous paranoid accusations and threats, and so on.

Now it's to "registered laboratories" whatever that means.

What I think it really means is that she has no clue about the data, probably cannot even open spreadsheet files (or she would have been misrepresenting mine) and perhaps even that the data is lost.

Certainly it means that the data is unavailable for critical inspection, now or ever.

IN STARK CONTRAST to Fuzzy's data, for example.

Hey TK,

Most members and guests don't realize how long "ALL" of my data's been in "ONE" place and 100% available for "ANYONE" to see and download .....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.energeticforum.com/94127-post522.html              05-05-2010, 09:47 AM

There is a link in this thread to all my images and data ..... POST 297

I've been Quite busy lately with many other projects and because of the bandwidth usage where my off site photo storage was it got to the maximum monthly use any more and I would have to pay for image and photo access for everyone, so now all my Tests are in a zip files each complete with "Original" photos, images and data dump sheets w/ test keys & temperature data, and at this time I can only offer my Windows Live "SkyDrive" public file, that has all the information available. Plus some interesting "public" folders available on other subjects and projects.

Mosfet Heater Folder

The best I can do

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.energeticforum.com/88993-post297.html            03-17-2010, 05:50 PM

Device testing Data and Image files were posted all in one spot a month ago .....

Fuzzy

EDIT - Also other available Mosfet Heater Circuit 'links'
Mosfet Heating Circuits - Energetic Forum
Mosfet Heater - Windows "Live" SkyDrive

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm sure if anyone looks will see a "complete" file on the Quantum COP>17 replication attempt I did including photos and device schematics of the process of doing the required modifications to even make the circuit work. One of the argued mandatory requirements by Rosemary was the need of a load inductor "FLY BACK" diode which my modified replication didn't have or anyone else's that did a COP>17 device replication attempt.

My attempt is all there "IN ONE PLACE"  https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=6b7817c40bb20460&id=6B7817C40BB20460!120  for over "TWO YEARS" now ......   

Whats Rosemary got to hide ? Where is her complete file on the testing and evaluation she did on this claimed COP>INFINITY device of hers ?? 

FTC

[TinselKoala]

That's a good question, Fuzzy. I've always held your work up as a good example, but as you know, Ainslie's way is the only way, with her.
Myself, I think that the data is probably gone. We are not talking about the most sophisticated computer user in South Africa, and she's reported several times that her computers have been hacked (lol) and have been out for "repair". What confidence can we have that a 2 gig thumbdrive has survived with its data intact? By now it's probably been overwritten with doggerel and cartoons.

BTW, I used a flyback diode, even compared several different ones, used them to charge caps to high voltage, even charged an external battery using the flyback diode to siphon off the ringing pulse from Ainslie's COP>17 circuit when I was working with it. Lots of fun there. I'm surprised there's no diode in the present mishmash, as it was supposed to be (at one time) critical... or wasn't critical... depending on which day you asked Ainslie about it.

No, we aren't going to be seeing any of Ainslie's spreadsheet data. We probably wouldn't even have the scopeshots, if she had her choice, now that she begins to understand what REAL data they contain, besides just numbers in boxes.

By the way, I've found and added about a dozen or more new finds to the Ainslie scopeshot compendium. I'll be zipping it up and posting it to the Downloads section later this afternoon, so stay tuned.

[TinselKoala]

And.... talking about tuning....

The ClassE SSTC is getting better and better. I added a bit of inductance to the board, made a new looser primary, and ran a good RF ground to a pipe outside. The result is much better Class E tuning performance and a lot better voltage output and magnification ratio.

The scopeshot below shows the top trace, Drain side of the primary coil, at 200 volts/division. The lower trace shows the field pickup from the secondary, just using the metal foil sheet there behind the coil, no physical connection. It's at 20 v/div. The meters show the input power from the filtered DC power supply. I can draw 3/8 inch silent blue arcs, very hot, to a metal object held in my hand, and the neons are painfully bright.
And the mosfet is staying quite cool, even with upwards of 3 amps at times, since the switching of the mosfet is happening at nearly the right time.
f₀ = 662.5 kHz