Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Analyzing the quotation that is found today on Rossi's JNP "official publication" of Ainslie's "papers", imaged above for reference and quoted here with comments interspersed:

Steam was evident at all times when the temperature exceeded
62°C,

Steam, Ainslie, does not occur unless Water Is Boiling... and Water DOES NOT BOIL at 62 degrees C. In other words, your data do not support your contention EVEN IN THE SAME SENTENCE: You lie. There was no steam.

which points to a secondary exploitable potential.

A false conclusion based on a lie about the experimental observation.

At no stage in this test was any energy depleted by the batteries as
measured in the math trace and spreadsheet analysis.

ON THE CONTRARY, AINSLIE: your own data from this trial DO INDEED show "energy depleted from the battery" as evident in the math trace.... and also the battery average voltage determined by examining the BATTERY MEAN VOLTAGE shown on several different scopeshots from the day of the reported trial... which clearly show a decreasing indicated MEAN BATTERY VOLTAGE over the morning of the trials. IN OTHER WORDS: Your own data once again refute your silly mendacious claim. And when you refer to your UNAVAILABLE SPREADSHEET... this is even more useless than referring to a Mickey Mouse cartoon, because at least THOSE can be reviewed and examined-- your original data is UNAVAILABLE except for the few scopeshots you've released. You are not allowed to talk about data that you cannot or will not produce in a scientific publication, Ainslie, but you... not having ever interacted properly in a scientific arena, simply ignore that fact and continue to make stuff up whenever you think you can get away with it.

Therefore it is evident that it is possible to bring water to boil

YOU NEVER BOILED WATER IN THE TEST YOU ARE REPORTING and it is a BIG LIE to continue to act as if you did, with your left-handed language that gives you plenty of weaselroom. YOU ARE CLAIMING THAT YOU BOILED WATER ON THAT TRIAL, but you did not ACTUALLY do so. There were small bubbles.... you liar.

without any depletion of potential difference from the supply.

This claim is a lie, is unsupported by Ainslie's own data, and in fact is refuted by them, and ANYONE who repeats the experiment can see that I am correct and that Ainslie is claiming something that her own data refute.

Given 4.1 joules required to heat 1 gram of water by 1°C then

The one statement in this entire paragraph that contains a hint of the truth. A calorie is imprecisely defined by Ainslie.

over the entire 1.6 hour test period about 5 904 000 joules
were dissipated.

OH REALLY AINSLIE. You sat next to a 1 KILOWATT HEAT SOURCE in a small closet of a room for 96 minutes, did you... but you don't mention boiling all the water away, or how uncomfortable it got in there....do you.
I DARE YOU TO TAKE A PORTABLE ELECTRIC HEATER INTO THAT ROOM, TURN IT ON AND CLOSE THE DOOR, and REPORT YOUR RESULTS HERE AFTER 96 MINUTES. You won't, though, because even YOU now realize that 5.9 megaJoule claim is stupid.
This 5.9 megaJoule claim in your OFFICIAL PUBLICATION (sic) is such a ridiculous lie that you have removed it WITHOUT RETRACTION OR COMMENT from the version posted on your new forum. BUT IT REMAINS IN THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION (sic) ON ROSSI'S JNP, you liar.

The batteries’ rated capacity is

IS WHAT, AINSLIE? What is the rated capacity of the battery? Isn't that an important bit of data when you are CONTINUING TO CLAIM THAT YOU EXCEEDED THE BATTERY'S RATED CAPACITY on several individual trials?

Your "paper" is a lie from start to finish, and the second "paper" is a hallucination, full of cartoons that DON'T EVEN CORRESPOND to the "corrected schematic" you now claim to have used.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2311.msg2558.html#msg2558

[Rosemary Ainslie]

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2311.msg2559.html#msg2559

[TinselKoala]

We aren't playing that game, Ainslie, you liar and troll.

Note the designations of the mosfet's "legs". This cartoon no longer corresponds to the schematic you claim to have used, you inconsistent lying arrogant willfully ignorant old woman of a troll.

[TinselKoala]

(a link to more lies)

Ainslie, we are not playing this game. If you want to discuss something or reply to something that is happening HERE, then do it HERE. This stupid idiotic thing you are doing, by posting links here over and over to your forum, is not only a violation of the TOS of this site but it is also SPAMMING and is STUPID. But considering the source..... it's expected from you, vile mendacious Ainslie troll.