Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

I have NEVER stated anywhere EVER - that we dissipate 5 megajoules of power during any test period.  Dear God.  This is SPIN gone WILD.

Rosemary

ADDED

We most certainly dissipated ABOUT 5 megajoules OVER that entire test period.  We omit reference to this in our paper because the quantity of water was not established.

Preserved for posterity.

Can anyone decode this self-contradictory statement? First she DENYS that she EVER CLAIMED IT, then she MOST CERTAINLY CLAIMS IT.
And as I have shown, both the water quantity AND the 5.9 megaJoule figure ARE given in the paper.

IT'S IN THE IMAGE I'VE POSTED, Ainslie. ANYONE CAN SEE THAT YOU ARE LYING RIGHT NOW !!

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And this is all why it is that it's a waste of time posting on this disgusting thread.  Cheers all.  I'll stick to my references in future.

Regards
Rosemary

[TinselKoala]

Pity?  You think I look for pity?  Then you REALLY don't know me.

R

If you are not looking for pity, why mention your health? Have I ever mentioned MY health?

You don't even know your own mind, evidently. You are indeed looking for pity and setting up an excuse for NOT TESTING anything, just as you used the earlier report of your relative's death to postpone.. and finally never do... the tests you had promised to do.

[TinselKoala]

And this is all why it is that it's a waste of time posting on this disgusting thread.  Cheers all.  I'll stick to my references in future.

Regards
Rosemary

Because you are continually refuted by your own contradictions and claims and data. Good bye, liar.

[picowatt]

Guys, this is in answer to picowatt's post.

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,3.msg2563.html#msg2563

Regards,
Rosemary

ADDED
MAGS you may want to read it.

added
for those who want to know the objective and relevance of the test here's a transcript

We will then be able to prove that picowatt's repeated reference to this through multiple posts on both TK's hate thread and my own flamed and locked thread - were spurious and intended ONLY to harass me personally and to imply publicly that our measurements are erroneous.  It will belie his allegation that experts at LeCroy have validated that this measurement is correctly shown as a DC coupled value. And it will show the relevance of the coupling which picowatt has been anxiously attempting to deny.

Again, as usual, you do not answer the question.


Setting the 'scope improperly by switching the FG channel to AC coupling so that it reads incorrectly is not an answer at all.

Your AC coupling argument is nonsense.  You do not even know enough about electronics to realize just how much nonsense that AC coupling argumet is.

Before doing any tests, I suggest you learn how to use a 'scope.

Something is amiss with Q1 in FIG3 and FIG7.  I believe just about everyone but you can see that.  All the necessary info is right there in FIG3 and FIG7 for all to see.

All data and discussion regarding the tests those captures depict needs to be retracted, corrected, or dismissed by the reader as invalid.