Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

Here, I've taken ten minutes out of my busy schedule to redraw the Quantum schematic in a more conventional manner, representing the 555 as it is generally done and using the conventional POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE POWER SUPPLY RAIL style of layout.

I would like someone to go over my drawing to confirm that I haven't made any errors in my transcription and that it corresponds properly to the Quantum diagram as published in the article. I am asking here for someone to check my work and tell me if I've made a mistake so I can CORRECT IT IMMEDIATELY if I've done so.


"Sorry about the Light...."

[TinselKoala]

No comments? Nobody cares?

That's certainly appropriate, but are we really going to let poor gmeast suffer under the illusion that maybe HE made a mistake, since Ainslie assures him all the stuff she assures him of?

Well, I'm not. At this point I haven't found any errors in my REDRAWING of Ainslie's circuit: my drawing is her circuit exactly, only drawn as 555 circuits are most commonly shown.

So... of course I put it together and made a video, just now.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2-gokjcDQQ

Now... gmeast, if you are reading here, I suggest you go ahead and build and USE the exact 555 timer circuit, set at the 96 percent ... something... setting, just as Ainslie claims, and see what kind of heat in the load you get. I predict that it will closely match the claims of heat in her experiment. Of course... your batteries will discharge, but you can console yourself with this sad fact: so do hers.

[fuzzytomcat]

Hi TK,

Your redrawn schematic appears to be correct, as a representation of the published October 2002 Quantum COP>17 article thats referenced as part of some proof on a "claim" in Rosemary's THESIS.

No comments? Nobody cares?

That's certainly appropriate, but are we really going to let poor gmeast suffer under the illusion that maybe HE made a mistake, since Ainslie assures him all the stuff she assures him of?

Well, I'm not. At this point I haven't found any errors in my REDRAWING of Ainslie's circuit: my drawing is her circuit exactly, only drawn as 555 circuits are most commonly shown.

So... of course I put it together and made a video, just now.

I'll post the link when it's done uploading.

Now... gmeast, if you are reading here, I suggest you go ahead and build and USE the exact 555 timer circuit, set at the 96 percent ... something... setting, just as Ainslie claims, and see what kind of heat in the load you get. I predict that it will closely match the claims of heat in her experiment. Of course... your batteries will discharge, but you can console yourself with this sad fact: so do hers.

Well ... with one exception outlined in this posting directed at you. 

http://www.energeticforum.com/59369-post262.html       07-06-2009, 01:25 PM

TinselKoala - THE ONLY APPROPRIATE CIRCUIT DIAGRAM that I can assure you is correct is the diagram in the paper. And the flyback diode is a critical part of the system.

The circuit diagram in the Quantum article was prepared by Brian Buckley. I cannot comment on whether it is right or not as I simply cannot read it. I am hoping that Donovan

will be able to comment in due course. I don't think he has even seen that article - as published.

But it is definitely required as without it we cannot 're-route' the collapsing fields back to the battery to recharge it.

As you can see a usage of the word "PAPER" which could mean the February 02, 2009 "EIT" paper (attached), or possibly the October 2002 Quantum COP>17 article (attached). 

Then there's that pesky "Fly Back Diode" .... for some kind of 're-route' 

FTC

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Here you go Little TK.  Something to give your thread some relevance and gravitas and INTEREST.  Go read that updated article and then comment.

Rosie Pose

http://www.energy-shiftingparadigms.com/index.php/topic,2322.msg2593.html#msg2593

[MileHigh]

The sheer brilliance of it all....

And so it goes.  We apparently have yet another need for yet another glove.  Here’s the thing.  We all know that if electrons were the actual ‘particles’ transferred from our generators by our utility supply sources, then those generators would need to supply an almost inexhaustible amount of electrons that somehow turn into photons that also somehow light whole cities â€" all of them linked, as is often the case, to a single supply grid.  That’s a whole lot of work.  Which calls for a whole bunch of electrons.  And the obvious problem? No utility supply source would be able to access that many.  There aren’t any spare electrons manufactured in those great big nuclear generators â€" or indeed, any generators.  Again.  No matter HOW skilled our scientists are, they cannot manufacture electrons on demand.

Absolutely incredible.