Testing the TK Tar Baby

[MileHigh]

TK:

It is becoming a bit lonely.  I am sure that you can understand the fatigue factor about the whole damn thing.

So, how about a little musical interlude, a great classic tune?  If you share my sense of humour you might find the geekish looks and dancing somewhat amusing.  It's obvious that it hadn't yet "hit" when this clip was recorded.

Patty Dukes on the cusp of becoming hippie girls with flowers in their hair with tie-dye t-shirts and jeans.

MileHigh

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toBl4rvTgs8

[evolvingape]

Forgot to mention, if you want to transmit power through a pressure wall you can also do it with this device using TK's wireless transmission technology:

http://www.seabirdadventure.com/tesla-turbine/superheated-electrolysis-and-adiabatic-compression

The difference is that in the SEC the pressure is static, whereas in the hydroelectrolytic turbine it is dynamic. Simplified construction due to no electrode gland with variable control over resonant frequency. AC or DC becomes a user defined variable, both having different properties, each being required in sequence, or not, for the desired effect(s).

Resonance of the internal tubular structure might also become interesting, to some.

Quite a few applications opening up for your new toy TK!

I always thought the ultimate irony would be a viable technology arising from the ashes of a perpetual pseudoscientific fraud.

[TinselKoala]

Fatigue, yes.

Here's a new one I just built.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

I am still waiting for that 'proof of hospitalisation'.  You need to show this Little TK.  Together with some reason that you allege is associated with my lack of sanity.  And while you're at it - then send us some proof of your qualification as a psychologist.

And are you telling us that your new toy performs at over unity?  Or that you're measuring COP infinity?  Get explicit - on both allegations.

Rosie Posie

[TinselKoala]

I am still waiting for that 'proof of hospitalisation'.  You need to show this Little TK.  Together with some reason that you allege is associated with my lack of sanity.  And while you're at it - then send us some proof of your qualification as a psychologist.

And are you telling us that your new toy performs at over unity?  Or that you're measuring COP infinity?  Get explicit - on both allegations.

Rosie Posie

No. I need show you nothing at all except the contempt you so richly deserve and have earned, in spades.
You are somewhat behind.

FIRST, you must PUBLICLY start retracting some of the LIES that you have been telling about me.

Let's start with that continuing canard that I do not take inductive reactance into account in my calculations. My spreadsheet SHOWING MY WORK, including the correct calculation of the total impedance of my CVR, was posted on the day I did it, and several times since, and it has been PUBLICLY AVAILABLE FOR MONTHS.

Now, you will retract the lie that you have been spreading with a POLITE STATEMENT HERE AND ON YOUR FORUM that you have been WRONG about that particular point and that you apologise to me.

Once you've taken care of THAT LIE that you keep spreading, which by the way is ACTIONABLE... then we can discuss some of the OTHER LIES that you have been spreading about me.

I need show YOU nothing at all.  You retract the lies that you have been telling.

You also need to do something about your "publication" on Rossi's JNP. It needs to be RETRACTED because it is FULL OF ERRORS AND LIES, and does not agree in many places with what you are NOW claiming.

YOUR LABORATORY IN THE USA  FALSIFIED YOUR CLAIMS. They found that their batteries RAN DOWN USING YOUR OWN APPARATUS.

Anything other than a COMPLETE RETRACTION of your claims, from you, is a continuing lie.