Testing the TK Tar Baby

[TinselKoala]

All the more nutty because of course .99 _has_ explained the "flow of current" in all conditions in the Ainslie NERD circuit. Some of it is illusory, an artefact of the inductances. Some of it is passing through the function generator, and some of it is passing as AC through the circuit's capacitances and the mosfet body diodes.

Poynt99 is able to predict, using his simulation, the current waveforms of the NERD circuit at any point. The circuit and its behaviour are UNDERSTOOD, by everyone except Ainslie, who is still trying to justify her Zipon "thesis", in spite of the fact that her "explanation" uses a diagram and a circuit path that is NOT EVEN PRESENT in the apparatus she claimed to use for the experiment.

Look at the labels on the cartoon mosfets! She doesn't even have her explanation describing the actual wiring of the circuit! So how could it POSSIBLY explain the operation of the circuit! It cannot.

So we have the "classical" model of electronics, standard physics, that is able to simulate and predict all of the NERD circuit performance accurately with the correct, actual schematic published as the one used by Ainslie ..... vying with a "thesis" that cannot make any quantitative predictions at all and whose only explanation of the current flow in the Ainslie circuit uses a wrong wiring arrangement entirely -- one that was NEVER used by any NERD circuit at any time -- and thus cannot explain anything.

The cartoons and the "explanation" were clearly prepared during the time when Ainslie and her "collaborators" did not yet realise their miswiring error--- they thought all the mosfets were in parallel AS IN THE CARTOON BELOW. And Ainslie in her arrogance and ignorance has never bothered to correct this fatal mistake, constantly pointing to this very "explanation", when in fact it corresponds to nothing that she ever tested or showed.

[TinselKoala]

I guess Ainslie is still refusing to watch my simple video demonstrations of how silly her claims are. Imagine.... she believes that diodes are perfect little one-way valves! And she thinks that people should pay attention to experimental evidence. Well, I certainly agree with that. Her own evidence refutes her claims completely, and as she continues to make fractured claim after silly claim, the evidence piles up that shows, beyond any doubt, that she is an overweeningly arrogant, ridiculously silly and mendacious old woman with rudimentary knowledge about electronics and none at all about real quantum electrodynamics.

[TinselKoala]

What did I tell you? Another insulting bit of drunken verbiage from Ainslie has dribbled out of her senile mind like the slackjawed drool it is.

The overweeningly arrogant, insulting and miraculously ignorant fool Rosemary Ainslie is now biting the hand that's been feeding her so carefully and patiently for these past years.

Meanwhile, the lies from Ainslie make such a big pile of stinking mendacity that it's hard to imagine how anyone will ever be able to fall into it again. Her "papers" themselves are lies!

[TinselKoala]

Ainslie has failed to deliver anything that she's promised over the last two threads. Ever since her posting of her video demo EIGHTEEN MONTHS ago, she has promised to do many things. Repeated testing, battery draw down tests, transcripts and critiques of all my videos, revisions and corrections of her daft manuscripts, proof of other collaborators endorsing her work.... nothing that she's promised has been performed. Not even the big revelation of the mysterious real identities of her "trolls". Nothing, nada, zip, zero. Ainslie has managed to avoid doing ANYTHING that she promised to do.

And now her sole replicator has gone "private" with his error-filled work. All that remains of the great Ainslie affair is a handful of insulting doggerel... and she can't even spell that right.

[poynt99]

And now her sole replicator has gone "private" with his error-filled work. All that remains of the great Ainslie affair is a handful of insulting doggerel... and she can't even spell that right.

I doubt they've figured out how to make a thread or board "private", and if they did, who would be posting/reading there anyway?

I guess it does however only take two to have a 'discussion'.