Testing the TK Tar Baby

[Magluvin]

"You have the sanctimonious and rather muddled mouthings of MaGsy the Mediocre"

Not so long ago, I was on your side. All of a sudden you flipped. After that is when I really had seen who and what you really are.

Like the beginning of your post, you talk of Sandy. You speak of it just to lay imaginary guilt on TK, not for the people that were in the storm. You are a user of their demise.

You lay claim that Tk is BL. And you keep on saying it, without a shred of evidence. And you lay it on TK to prove you wrong? lol  You are making the claim without facts or proof to back it up. That is the way you do things. And you think your little tricky ways are going to get TK to divvy up his real identity so that you can plaster your nonsense and lies about him all over the net and fill his emails with your sickness. Like you do Harvey.  You are a terrible person.

If you cannot prove TK is BL then what is your point?  Just like your circuits. You talk talk talk, send it to a lab, they tell you the battery is draining, and soon after you still claim the batteries dont drain, and even worse, still claim that they recharge from the circuit.

You have no 'technology'.

You ask TK for proof that he is not BL, yet you are the accuser with no case. How would that go down in a court of law?
" Your honor, I say TK is Brian Little. I rest my case." lol   And all with not a shred of evidence to prove any of what you claim on your table.  Do you not think the Judge would ask you for some proof of your claim?  Case dismissed.  Against your evidence, of which you have none, All TK has to prove is that you have lied many times, not prove he is not BL. That is your responsibility to the court. His evidence of your lies would be stacked high against your empty folder. Again, case dismissed.

His witnesses would be in much greater numbers than your GMeast, of which some of his quotes and statements would work against you. Case dismissed.

It is not up to TK to prove his real identity. In fact, he has put it to you to open your folder to show evidence that he 'is' BL, well knowing that if he is BL, the cat would be out of the bag. But you still have nothing. Case dismissed.

You have the sanctimonious and rather muddled mouthings of your self, and its mediocre.

MaGs

[poynt99]

I was going through some old posts looking for a particular username, and came across this one where I believe the flyback diode issue was first mentioned:

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189605/#msg189605

[MileHigh]

It's pretty ghastly that Rosemary has crossed that line and revealed someone's identity, even if she got it wrong.  I am just horrified and I warned her not to do it.  She even threatened to reveal someone else's identity.

Her circuit is a very unhealthy obsession for her and it apparently is not abating.  This is not a happy story at all and it would seem that there is no ending in sight.

[TinselKoala]

TK,

You are CORRECT!  I DO have an agenda. That agenda is:

You are INCORRECT... because we weren't talking about YOUR agenda, which no one cares about except you.

It is AINSLIE who has the definite AGENDA and it's clear, or should be, or would be if YOU HAD DONE YOUR HOMEWORK just what that agenda of Ainslie's really is.

... to keep investigating the possibility that 'sharp transient pulses' applied to an Inductive-Resistive heating element can produce excess thermal heating beyond the theoretical Joule heating allowed from the electrical energy applied to it.

As if that issue had not been investigated already, for YEARS, by expert designers of switchmode power supplies and PWM motor control systems and other systems, working in teams and individually, in graduate physics and EE departments in universities and in industry, all around the world. The basic circuit you are using can even be found in the application notes for many mosfets, as one of the mosfet performance parameter test circuits, as FuzzyTomCat has illustrated several times. Have you ever read the application notes for your mosfets? You should, you might learn something. But then again, we know your attitude towards homework and textual research.

Sure.... you, GMEAST, sitting there with a computer-card oscilloscope and a handful of other equipment, are going to be adding to the knowledge that has been gathered in this field for a hundred years or more. When you DO produce a paper that's accepted for publication in an electronics/physics journal.... then we'll know that your research has borne fruit. But do you know how many research papers are submitted WITH ERRORS that doom them.. from people who have complete laboratories, teams of grad students, and a long history of successful research? But of course YOU don't make errors. So when you discover something that isn't already in the books, YOUR paper will be published immediately without question. Right.

That's it! That's my agenda. I never heard of Rosemary Ainslie or anyone else associated with that technology UNTIL I  viewed Aaron's videos on the subject over on Energetic Forum.


My efforts toward this end, though not receiving YOUR blessings (as if they are required) will continue unabated and with even more tenacity BECAUSE of the opposition to its very notion that has been expressed by an insignificant few like you and your cult followers.

SO you are like the little kid, who, when advised not to jump out the window because it will hurt you, does it anyway, BECAUSE of the opposition. Not doing your homework to find that everyone who has done the same thing has broken an ankle......

Insignificant few? Rather, EVERYONE with the tech skill and knowledge who knows about your work has criticised it strongly..... except AINSLIE of course -- but she clearly doesn't have the knowledge to comment coherently. "No such animal as inductive reactance!!" What does THAT do to your "research", GMEAST, since whatever you think is "inductive reactance" must be, according to AINSLIE, something else entirely, involving Zipons at twice the speed of light?
And based on her past record, an "endorsement" from her is a pretty sure sign that you are wasting your time. After all.... she believed MyLOW was genuine, she believes Rossi is genuine...... and the list goes on.

You are obviously an intelligent person, but sad as it is, you are full of hate and disdain for the views and efforts of others.  You are a pitiable individual.

I don't think anyone pities me, GMEAST, and I've never complained about my health, my lack of resources, my age, or anything else except the lies and mendacity from AINSLIE, and your own arrogant attitude when it's poynted out that you are wrong. Why should anyone pity me? They cannot PROVE ME WRONG, after all, so maybe they should pity themselves.

Once again, you do not consider the source of my disdain. DO YOUR HOMEWORK. The post linked by .99  above , going back to my 2009 research ON THE SAME CIRCUIT THAT YOU STARTED WITH, will show you where some of my "disdain" comes from , and why it's directed TOWARD ROSEMARY AINSLIE and those who blindly support her.

I do indeed have disdain for the efforts of others when it's clear that they are blind and will not take advice or learn from their peers and betters, and when they lie about their "research", even to the point of fabricating data or making absurd arithmetic mistakes and treating the results as fact. Like AINSLIE, and like you. I respond with anger and frustration to the ridiculous insane insults and lies and disrespect and accusations from the crazy old uneducated ignorant madwoman ROSEMARY AINSLIE, and after nearly FOUR YEARS of this utter unmitigated CRAP from her..... that's right, I do not consider Ainslie to be worthy of affection, that's for sure. Do I show hatred? Or do I simply give as good as I've been getting?

Remember this, GMEAST: I can PROVE all my assertions with facts, references and even demonstrations, and I'm ready and willing to do so AT ANY TIME. Where's the hatred in that? Is it an expression of hatred to point out the lies and false claims of others who are seeking monetary rewards and prizes based on their false claims, and to defend myself against the ridiculous accusations and libels of an insane person?

On the other hand, AINSLIE has been insulting me, disrespecting me and my work and my equipment, has been spewing nonsense for years, has incontrovertibly lied over and over, hasn't proven a single thing, and in fact has made MANY assertions and claims that CANNOT BE PROVEN AT ALL since they are simply false. I submit to you, GMEAST, that the person who is full of hatred, vitriol, disrespect, self-pity and ignorance around here, is in fact ROSEMARY AINSLIE herself.
You are managing to approach her record, though.

But your work does have some value in this context: Your work has disproven several of Ainslie's claims and assertions, YET AGAIN, about her claimed COP>17 circuit.

[TinselKoala]

I was going through some old posts looking for a particular username, and came across this one where I believe the flyback diode issue was first mentioned:

http://www.overunity.com/7620/claimed-ou-circuit-of-rosemary-ainslie/msg189605/#msg189605

Thanks for posting that. There is some interesting reading there, in the pages around that point. For example: Ainslie again publishes, or tries to publish, conflicting circuit diagrams that purport to be describing the same experiment; the published circuits do not make the correct duty cycle; the batteries are claimed to be 20 A-H when as we now know they were 60 A-H batteries........ and it goes on and on. This is when there were concurrent threads here and on Energetic Forum concerning her claims..... and this is when Ainslie started in with her insults, disrespect, continuing lies and false claims, attacking the persons, competences, and equipment of anyone who pointed out the errors and inconsistencies in her claims.