quentron.com

[profitis]

except that that little journal was but one out of thousands coming to the same conclusion you silly man.in fact so many journals came to the same conclusion that theyve christened it the 'nemca'effect @sarkeizen.its now officialy textbook material @sarkeizen.check it up in wikipedia @sarkeizen.karpens crapster is powered by the nemca effect @sarkeizen. and dont insult our FREE-energy website with its FREE-energy seekers ne.its here for a reason.   

[sarkeizen]

except that that little journal was but one out of thousands coming to the same conclusion you silly man

Same problem. No cite.  No argument. Hence you are failing.

.in fact so many journals came to the same conclusion

If so it should be easy to cite one and provide a series of irrefutable steps in plain english but you keep refusing to do so.

its now officialy textbook material

Then you should be able to show me a textbook with the statement and mentioning how it would power something forever or provide a formal logical argument to this effect.

and dont insult our FREE-energy website with its FREE-energy seekers ne

I didn't insult them.  I described them.  Accurately.  Free energy movement collectively has about as much skepticism as a child who believes in Santa.

.its here for a reason.

I agree, it's here because we have people who are idle, insecure, uninformed and uncritical.

[profitis]

no @sarkeizen.you will see that i am correct in a laboratory ie.that only a pressure difference across any karpen electrodes will halt their power output,bring them to rest equilibrium.the differential nemca effect will remain on a permanent basis otherwise and result in continuous gaseous potential difference and hence power output in nothing less than total violation of the 2nd law thermodynamics.you will see zero corrosion of electrodes as the nemca effect is non-faradaic,electrostatic.

[sarkeizen]

no @sarkeizen.you will see that i am correct in a laboratory

So wait...at first you said that I don't need to do anything but look at textbooks.
Then you couldn't tell me which ones.
Then you claimed you did (but didn't)
Then you said I have to build it.
Now you say I need a laboratory?

At what point do you actually admit that you failed to make your point?  i.e. That all we need to look at are textbooks.

Don't you think post hoc claiming that a) You can't show me which textbooks, b) I need to build it myself - to perform a test that is meaningless I might add and c) that I need to do so in a laboratory is more than a little deceptive?  As in "winner of most deceptive thesis of the year award", kind of deceptive?

[profitis]

you can try the thing wherever you want @sarkeizen.in your lounge,in the pool,underground,in outer space,it will work,nonstop.the nemca effect is the nemca effect case closed,slam dunk.we can now directly mathematicly tie work function,voltage,gas chemisorption,gas liberation and ...entropy...into one formula that is totaly compliant and dependant upon well accepted standards.let us celebrate @sarkeizen for this is a monumentous occasion just as we pass into the new year.im officialy the first guy to bust the mystery of karpens crapster into mainstream frei-energie website world,and from there into the established laboratory world.i bridged the gap.