quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

my old point proves my new point

Your old point is unproven...you have provided one cite and no formal logical argument.

[profitis]

my new point is proven: you have provided no cite and no argument whatsoever,nevermind logical.@sarkeizen.

[sarkeizen]

my new point is proven:

No, not really.

So can I take your post here as an admission that you don't know how stupid your request is?  Again, a simple "yes" and I'll go through and mow it down.   If you're afraid please continue evading the question.

[profitis]

its not a request @sarkeizen.its a demand.a demand petitioned by me and the entire overunity community.a demand that you uphold a very important statement in physics,a statement made by lord kelvin over 100years ago.you have to show us how it applies to the wikipedia battery.you have to show us where it fits in with the wikipedia battery and how it kills the wikipedia battery.anything less than this is unacceptable and unscientific.if you dont do this we are forced to declare the foundation of your entire arguments in this thread null and void. 

[sarkeizen]

its not a request @sarkeizen.its a demand.a demand petitioned by me and the entire overunity community.

So can I take this demand from you and the clown patrol as an admission that you don't know how stupid it is?