quentron.com

[profitis]

No @markE.Its more a case of 2lot re-arrangements being not quite the 'in' thing to do.its not in the elites interests to re-arrange such a law so it aint going to officialy happen regardless what evidence arises.for example,another 50years will go by with no official consensus over karpens lil battery even though it fits perfectly into college textbooks. 

[sarkeizen]

it fits perfectly into college textbooks.

An assertion you've never been able to demonstrate in any useful way.

[profitis]

It wasn't me who asserted overpotential differences @sarkeizen.it was the textbooks.I only asserted that you could not escape a 2lot disgrace if you agreed with the textbooks and that that assertion had no alternative assertion in theory or practice.

[sarkeizen]

it was the textbooks.

So far, no textbook cites mentioning violating 2LOT.  So far no textbook cites that provide the basis of a formal argument to violating 2LOT.  So far, you haven't substantiated your claim.

[profitis]

So why is it then impossible for you to point out how the textbook assertion does not end in a nightmare 2lot disgrace then @sarkeizen.the textbooks asserted that gas spillover will in fact take place.