quentron.com

[profitis]

It'l last long enough to profit from it @mark E,that's our only concern.the lab that hires my ass will soar ahead of all the others in research.

[sarkeizen]

No only someone who cannot specificly point out the irreversability of hydrogen spillover will build the cell

Let's review:

You argue that someone who can't falsify an argument that
i)  is not explained to their satisfaction
ii) where no evidence from established authority is presented
iii) the person who is giving instruction lies frequently and happily
iv) there is work in other fields which says that the conclusion of the undisclosed argument is unlikely.

is therefore rationally required to build this.  Is pretty moronic, or pretty well illustrates how enormous the morons here are (if this indeed reflects people at OU).  There are literally an infinite number of arguments which could be posed this way.

Where I come from we use our brain to decide what is a good use of time.  This isn't.  The numbers are pretty clear.  Sorry.

you still haven't explained to us how your going to judge an argument formatted your way with little or no knowledge in the field.

I did, you didn't read or didn't understand it.  All formal arguments can be evaluated or demonstrated to be not formal.  Which is all I said I would do.

[profitis]

You're entitled to your opinion @sarkeizen.others believe in the old english saying,'the proof is in the pudding'. The bottom line is that you cannot disprove MY argument for reversability if you build the cell to specification or even in theory.

[sarkeizen]

You're entitled to your opinion

My opinion just happens to be supported by the numbers and reason.

@sarkeizen.others believe in the old english saying,'the proof is in the pudding'.

Whatever that saying is supposed to mean it probably does not mean that: Liars are good sources of information.  Insufficiently explained arguments are persuasive and existing evidence should lose it's weight in the light of contrary claims.  In other words since you can not build everything some uneducated moron suggests on the internet.  You must use your brain to decide what to build and what not to build.  You have not met even a modicum of evidence.  Hence you are either wrong to suggest I build something or you are not using your brain.

The bottom line is that you cannot disprove MY argument

Of course I can.  You have simply refused to present it in a way that is useful to me.  I have told you exactly what I wanted for months and you have refused and lied and played games.  It's pretty stupid to build something solely on a hidden argument, no authoratitive evidence and the testimony of liars.   Perhaps building anything presented by any liar with any undisclosed theory that is against the existing body of work is, to you a good idea.

[MarkE]

It'l last long enough to profit from it @mark E,that's our only concern.the lab that hires my ass will soar ahead of all the others in research.

If you think that what you've been posting here would help with a research position job search, I think you are badly mistaken.  I do not believe that your posts represent a skilled and knowledgeable person who articulates persuasive arguments.  One of the running difficulties is that you seem very reluctant to actually formulate and express an argument.