quentron.com

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'Don't pop any more vitamins.  They seem to make you less smart. '

If it takes being dumb to get you into such easy corners give me more

[sarkeizen]

How can a theorem restrict a machines performance

The BBBV restricts the ability to create a machine using quantum effects which has a complexity class of O(1) (for sorting) because the BBBV states that the greatest improvement you can get from quantum effects is O(X^1/2).

and at the same time insist that you meant the above in a different context

Please rephrase in English.  I don't know what you're referring to as "a different context".

I'll just point out than in this current exchange I've asked you three or four questions concerning the questions you are asking and you can't answer them.  Isn't that kind of cool.  That you don't even know what you're talking about enough to answer a question like: "What do you mean by algorithm proof?".  Seriously your grasp of what you know is that shitty.

[sarkeizen]

If it takes being dumb to get you into such easy corners give me more

ROFL!

If I was cornered it would be trivial to produce a proof that I'm incorrect about something.  So far all you do is ask questions that are excessively vague and stupid. 

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'The BBBV restricts the ability to create a machine using quantum effects which has a complexity class of O(1) (for sorting)'

Will you allow me to attatch a switch to the quenco If I can show you how a quenco can work without violating this theorem

[sarkeizen]

Will you allow me to attatch a switch to the quenco

Sure...in a separate thread about Profitis shitty switched quenco - or some other name.  This thread however is about quenco.  Quenco sorts, it appears to sort in O(1).  Hence it can not function by BBBV.

This is no different than someone saying: I've got a device which can deterministically determine if arbitrary program can terminate.