quentron.com

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'Sure...in a separate thread'

..And mr sarkeizen backs out again.puk-puk-puuuuk (feathers fly allover the place ).chickenshit mr sarkeizen

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'ROFL!

If I was cornered it would be trivial to produce a proof that I'm incorrect about something.'

You won't allow it.you've banned switches,again

[sarkeizen]

..And mr sarkeizen backs out again.puk-puk-puuuuk (feathers fly allover the place ).chickenshit mr sarkeizen

Awww, it's so cute when you think you can bully people.  It's also slightly disturbing that you generally think bullying is an acceptable thing to do.  That said if you were some kind of worthwhile human being you probably wouldn't bullshit and lie so much.   But I guess you self-justify these things in some (very stupid) way.

So here's a question that you can't answer: What exactly am I backing out of?  I said I had something to say about Philip Hardcastle's Quenco.  You admitted that what you want to discuss is NOT a Phlip Hardcastle quenco.  You want to make up some other thing to argue about.  I say fine.  Just put it in a thread about that thing. 

The fact that you won't is pretty interesting.  It would take you two seconds to do that.  So why are you letting me control this argument?   Probably because you can't make your point and you would do ANYTHING to stall things.

Me I'm happy to talk about both - just not in the same thread.  You can go on bullying some more if you like.

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'What exactly am I backing out of?'

I said that I can SHOW you how a quenco can work WITHOUT violating bbbv theorem by adding a simpleton switch (doesn't interfere with quenco funtions) then you said you don't want to see it.this after I told you I won't budge to another thread. i really thought you were maybe,ya'know, keen to see how

[profitis]

Sarkeizen:'You admitted that what you want to discuss is NOT a Phlip Hardcastle quenco.'

Where did I admit such a thing don't be ridiculous