quentron.com

[forcefield]

It is my claim that the above device will unequivocally violate the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics (2LOT).
Immersed in a single reservoir of heat it will produce a continuous electrical output exceeding 1 Watt.

I thought I read somewhere on this thread or perhaps on the Quentron website that the Sebithenco Device puts out something like 1/2 volt open circuit and has a closed circuit current measured in microAmps.  That would be something like microWatts.  Now I'm reading "exceeding 1 Watt."  Is this accurate?  At one watt, it should be pretty easy to eliminate other possible sources of the power.

[sarkeizen]

I thought I read somewhere on this thread or perhaps on the Quentron website that the Sebithenco Device puts out something like 1/2 volt open circuit and has a closed circuit current measured in microAmps.  That would be something like microWatts.  Now I'm reading "exceeding 1 Watt."  Is this accurate?  At one watt, it should be pretty easy to eliminate other possible sources of the power.

The whole thing is written kind of carelessly.

So the claim is the device unequivocally violates 2LOT and also produces 1 Watt of power in an isothermal environment,  At what temperature?  Room temperature?  I'm pretty sure that's easy to invalidate.   So if it doesn't violate 2LOT you get $200,000 but what if it doesn't produce 1 Watt.  Is that sufficient to invalidate the claim of unequivocally violating 2LOT?  It's possible - I mean if Philip was doing actual science and we had an actual theoretical model for this phenomena the evidence could invalidate or validate the claim but since we just have the word of Philip and how is band of scientists and investors are completely satisfied it's impossible.  As it stands, getting less than 1 Watt doesn't seem to have any official standing in the Quenco-verse.

[forcefield]

The whole thing is written kind of carelessly.

Absolutely.  But at 1 watt, he has my attention!  I mean this is supposedly an experiment that he actually performed.  Even if it was fairly sloppy, it should be pretty hard to get 1 watt.  (I guess it just depends on exactly how sloppy it was.)  But, again, wasn't he talking microWatts earlier???

[sarkeizen]

Absolutely.  But at 1 watt, he has my attention!  I mean this is supposedly an experiment that he actually performed.  Even if it was fairly sloppy, it should be pretty hard to get 1 watt.  (I guess it just depends on exactly how sloppy it was.)  But, again, wasn't he talking microWatts earlier???

IIRC he said "750 mV" or "nearly a volt" - I somehow doubt he was getting a full Amp out of the device.

[MileHigh]

No more claim of a February demo on the website.

I don't recall the use of the term "SEBITHENCO DEVICE" before.  The diagram on the website makes it appear to be a TV tube, but that's not clear at all.

I don't recall any previous references to a device outputting more than one watt.   The TV tube test alleges an output of about 10^-12 watts.  Philip's "real" device will output tens of watts, it's supposed to be able to power an iPad, right?  So what is this mysterious one-watt device?

Immersed in a single reservoir of heat it will produce a continuous electrical output exceeding 1 Watt.

One more time, there is no characterization of the nature of the electrical output from the device.  No person that has allegedly been in years of development of a device that outputs electrical power would not include this information.

Less than two months now for Philip to deliver a real working device that outputs tens of watts like he promised in December.