quentron.com

[TinselKoala]

I just got this PM from PJH. I wonder what his "solicitors" will say about this.

Al, Tin, whatever you want to call yourself, you are the biggest loser!


I read between the lines here and at moletrap that you are an aging and failed drunk.


What I understand is that you have no money, no home of your own, and no woman in your life.


You do nothing other than masturbate your ego and dream of things you once were capable of.


You probably have some other issues to deal, focus on those and leave me out of your vitriol.

This is a clear libel. Aging and failed drunk, etc.

Hardcastle, you cannot support your contentions with evidence. PROVE THAT I AM A "DRUNK" or apologise and retract this statement immediately.
Prove that I "do nothing other than masturbate your ego and dream of things you once were capable of". You cannot.  You cannot support any of your other contentions about me with facts. I am 58 years old, for example. Is that "aging"? Perhaps I could call you "immature and callow youth". Does that say anything about your ideas or work?

I have a good mind to call up some of my friends in Palo Alto to check up on your "project" at Stanford.

ETA: Yes, there are things I've done that I am no longer capable of. Coronary heart disease and triple bypass surgery does tend to slow one down a bit; I no longer give aerobatic demonstrations or flight instruction in gliders, for example.  However, I am still perfectly capable of refuting your nonsense.

[Madebymonkeys]

I just got this PM from PJH. I wonder what his "solicitors" will say about this.

This is a clear libel. Aging and failed drunk, etc.

Hardcastle, you cannot support your contentions with evidence. PROVE THAT I AM A "DRUNK" or apologise and retract this statement immediately.
Prove that I "do nothing other than masturbate your ego and dream of things you once were capable of". You cannot.  You cannot support any of your other contentions about me with facts. I am 58 years old, for example. Is that "aging"? Perhaps I could call you "immature and callow youth". Does that say anything about your ideas or work?

I have a good mind to call up some of my friends in Palo Alto to check up on your "project" at Stanford.

ETA: Yes, there are things I've done that I am no longer capable of. Coronary heart disease and triple bypass surgery does tend to slow one down a bit; I no longer give aerobatic demonstrations or flight instruction in gliders, for example.  However, I am still perfectly capable of refuting your nonsense.

Well said
I think PJH is getting into the US litigious way of life a little too heavily....or doesn't understand basic law at least!!

[sarkeizen]

Well said
I think PJH is getting into the US litigious way of life a little too heavily....or doesn't understand basic law at least!!

I think Philip has kind of showed his hand as "not a very nice person".  He appears to be willing to file against Overunity a site that allows him to advertise his unworkable designs for free, in order to get information that really wouldn't help him anyway.  I get the impression that he barely tolerates his supporters.  Which makes Bruce_TPU's constant series of neck massages even more sad.

Anyway, moving on.  So I don't really know what lumen was on about concerning prisms but I'll guess that like Phil he assumes that there is some special mechanism which allows you to sort for free.   The problem with that approach is that even if you for some reason think you can make decisions without having information.  You create another problem.  See like it or not a MD device can be used to represent information.  If somehow it's able to represent information without any kind of temporary storage.  Then it's, by definition deriving this information from something.  However it seems pretty clear that an MD of this sort is an O(1) device.  That is the time it takes to 'decide' isn't a function of the energy state of the particle it's making the decision on.  Which violates one of the earliest quantum computing theorems BBBV.  Which states that even a quantum computer can not derive an oracle (an unknown value)  in less than sqrt(n) time.

Now as I said earlier, I'm smart enough to know that this isn't a formal proof but it just goes to show to Philp (and Lumen) that information theory and computational complexity aren't things you can simply just laugh off (as Philip did in his earlier Quenco theory page).  That said I urge you to read about this stuff yourself because right now I'm the only person here who appears to know anything about this subject and it's always bad to get your info from a monolithic source.

[Bruce_TPU]

I think Philip has kind of showed his hand as "not a very nice person".

HA!  The Pot calling the Kettle Black. 
You keep bringin in my name, when asked not too, troll.  You have the personality of a stalker, by the way.  I hope Philip does indeed sue your tail off. 
You can't just argue (again and again and again) against something that you want so much to not be so (paid schill?) but you have defamed Philip as a person time and time again.  aprox 58 times.  There is no moderation on this board simply because probably Stefan does not believe in the tech.  If he did, you would alread be banned from this thread, like MH was banned from the friction heater thread for harrassing Gabriel.

Build something troll.  Oh, forgot, trolls don't build they only armchair critisize other who dare to dream.  Otto used to call your lot PC heroes.  But that is too nice of a term.  PC Trolls. 

[sarkeizen]

HA!  The Pot calling the Kettle Black.

I just mean something different than you do.  I may be perceived by some as acerbic.  Philip seems more like someone who has a particular goal and really little in the way of qualms as to how it is achieved.  To wit: He, at least in his huffing and puffing speechifying would bring the law against Overunity in order to get what measly data they have about me.

You keep bringin in my name, when asked not too

You keep acting like someone who thinks they deserve respect. 

You have the personality of a stalker, by the way.

Because in the world of Bruce_TPU complex and complete personality analysis can be done through a few exchanges on the internet.  Psychologists the world over thank you for simplifying their complex tasks.

I hope Philip does indeed sue your tail off.

Because wishing bad things on people is always the right thing to do.   You're a pretty bad advertisement for your religion, just sayin'

You can't just argue (again and again and again) against something that you want so much to not be so (paid schill?)

Isn't calling someone a "paid schill" defamation?

but you have defamed Philip as a person time and time again.

If you mean that Philip is a bad manager.  That has been explained as a logical consequence of believing in the Quenco technlogy and the reports of Philip.  If we are to believe your accounting this has been explained to you 59 times without you grasping it.  Not something I'd boast about personally.

Also, it's been mentioned to you that Philip agrees with the assessment.

Build something troll. Oh, forgot, trolls don't build they only armchair critisize other who dare to dream.

Well I built something that I doubt you will ever be able to:  A cogent argument.

Let me know when you can build one of those and you might get some respect out of me.  Until then you're just some junkyard dog yipping at someone who dares to take either your or Philip's name in vain.  Real humble for a theist.