quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

Sarky went on and on and on about me being a bad project manager, well since I missed all my stated deadlines that is a sustainable criticism just as soon as he shows me someone that has done the same task better in a year.

From outside Philip you've produced nothing.  No prototypes, no demos - so from that vantage point most people produce as much in a year.  Even if we believe you have what you say you have.  Your logic is entirely wrong. The rate of production isn't completely dependent from how production is managed.   The point of managing your work is to produce predictable deadlines and outcomes and to communicate them well.  This is what you didn't do.  You estimated things that I would say anyone who's managed a project would not have.  You budgeted no overrun time from where I can see and simply thought that whatever you were doing next would solve your problem.  Naive is probably the kindest word for that.

[quote It is illogical to expect me to tell you how long the near impossible is going to take[/quote]
What's illogical is to call anything "near impossible".  You can not be close to impossible any more than you can be close to infinity.

we already found out about 4x more than we all thought, now I can estimate how long the difficult is going to take with greater precision, but the best answer is clearly very Sooooooooooooooooooon.

Soon, it what you have been always saying.  How is that more precise?

[orbut 3000]

Great to see @Philip back on track!


I think nobody here really believed that @Philip is bad project manager.
On the contrary, he managed this whole affair very well so far and at the end of the day, week, month, year, decade - whatever,
it's the result that counts, the benefit for mankind.


The holy almighty God alone knows what evil force motivated @'sarkey' to misbehave in such appalling way,
but let's just pray for his eternal soul and be greatful that he can't suppress the development of the human species anymore.


Truth, patience, progress, peace.

[Regster]

You realize that's almost a direct proxy for saying I'm intelligent right?

I am very happy you feel that way.  Incidentally, sea lions are great at looking at/memorising stuff and chimps are demonstrably better than humans at some aspects of this little party trick.   Feel free to crack open a tin of sardines and give yourself a round of applause.... and please don't feel too jealous of those pesky chimps.

[e2matrix]

     I've been away couple weeks but I see things are amping up.   Knowing most of the players here possibly a little better than Philip it appears they all are making posts based on their personal agendas.   I think we all know Snarky or  whatever has to be either paid to do his evil or someone who will lose big when Quenco gets rolling since he spends all his time here trying to bash the heck out of Quenco.  Others I know would stand to lose out on some business of their own making when Quenco goes mainstream.   And others would seem to have Aspergers syndrome or some psychological quirk of a very contrary nature.   But I would personally stand by my judgement of Philip any day and I just spent a couple days with the vice president of a company that anyone would recognize and told him about Philip and Quenco.   This is not a high tech company that could directly build or use Quenco but my point is I believe in Quenco enough to discuss it with such a person.
    We all have our opinions here and most express them openly behind their curtain of anonymity.   I think anyone reading this thread with reasonable people skills can see behind the veils of some of the players.    I see a only a few straight shooters here and I believe Philip is one of them.   Yes my opinion is just one more of the anonymous people here but I can say from the heart I only desire a better world for everyone.   I'm sure Philip and some others here have the same aspiration.   It seems obvious others do not....

[sarkeizen]

I am very happy you feel that way.

It's simply the truth.

"A review of the recent research reveals that WMC and g are indeed highly related, but not identical." - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14643371
I'm still waiting for you to explain how you think you code around the halting problem.  Perhaps it's just me but you get really vague on that point.  I think you're probably blowing smoke here.

I think we all know Snarky or  whatever has to be either paid to do his evil or someone who will lose big when Quenco gets rolling since he spends all his time here trying to bash the heck out of Quenco.

That's pretty much a false dichotomy.  Seriously, do any of you think Philip - who has been ignored by every university he's attempted to contact - has made any enemies?  For the last few weeks, I've barely been able to talk about quenco.  I've been spending all my time teaching lumen math that was proven over half a century ago.  The only thing I've said about Quenco is that assuming it works the way Philip says it does it's a Maxwell's Demon machine.  Therefore it's under information theory and considering that Philip's favorite argument is essentially "no it isn't".  My counter has been: "If it isn't then it's under complexity theory".

I confess that this place as been something other than helpful in terms of determining why this might not be the case.  Everyone's argument   can be summed up in one sentence: "The results are correct and Philips interpretation is correct so anything that contradicts this must be false" - Why even bother thinking if that's your POV?

my opinion is just one more of the anonymous people here but I can say from the heart I only desire a better world for everyone.   I'm sure Philip and some others here have the same aspiration.   It seems obvious others do not....

So what's the theory now?  People skills determine what's science and what isn't?  Thinking something is wrong, because it doesn't make sense from a mathematical point of view means I don't want a better world?  Have you ever considered that what Philip produces could easily make the world worse rather than better?  Energy is simply the potential to do work it doesn't obey a moral code.

And others would seem to have Aspergers syndrome or some psychological quirk of a very contrary nature.

You know turning a psychological disorder which you are not qualified to diagnose (or correct in your diagnosis) into a broad insult is pretty insensitive to people who legitimately suffer from these things.