quentron.com

[leds]

My definition of work requires one to produce something.  So far, what Philip does doesn't qualify.Posting on one topic is stalking?  Weird (and stupid) definition.  I was one of the readers of this site and mildly positive about Philip's work.  Then I started poking around and saw exactly how many times Philip has told the same story.  Here and elsewhere.  It made me realize that considering Philip to be accurate and honest implies that he sucks in a pretty severe and abiding way at doing his job.  Which is not a very good sign.  I also realized that almost none of Philips arguments hold much water and none of his explanations are very good - his whole "theory" section of his constantly revolving website begs the important question.  Even Lumen who has drunk the Philip Kool-Aid many times over agreed with that..  From there I realized there's inverse correlation between people knowing what they are talking about and the degree to which they believe Philip.   Not to mention people here who simply embrace irrationality whole hog offering sermons on patience and selfishness or attack it with whines of pseudoskepticism and made up medical disorders.

200 posts on same topic???

and about philip faillures...
his been trying to have this working  for sometime and havent had the results he expected but...
even though i dont have any education in science i always thought that the most basic rule was if you dont suceed you keep on trying and correct the errors until you achieve sucess

i dont see him scamming money in here from anyone
he admits his faillures in public even though he doesnt have todo it, while most hide and never reveal them

Phillip has my respect even if he cant accomplish anything
at least he trys, he has a goal,

PS: i will just problably follow broli advice and jump off this non-sense discussion

and sorry for my engrish im portuguese

[sarkeizen]

200 posts on same topic???

It was a bunch of topics.  There were several discussions about how lateness affects the probability of delivery.   There were some about information theory and then one where I summed up stuff I put in other posts.  Nobody seems to have the background to discuss this though.  There were discussions on computer science - because Lumen believes that unless you know the mechanism of a device to some arbitrary degree you can't determine if it will or will not function (or if such a thing can be built).  This was relevant because Information Theory, Complexity Theory and just about all math says you can do this.  There were a bunch of backbiting posts from someone who likes to post purile sayings on pictures because they don't have anything useful to say.  Most recently I demonstrated that an article which implied that skepticism is the result of a mental disorder and posted on a number of websites (at least two free energy web sites) plagiarizes an online article which is entirely made up.  Two hundred messages across ten or so topics isn't so much.

even though i dont have any education in science i always thought that the most basic rule was if you dont suceed you keep on trying and correct the errors until you achieve sucess

Why would you think that would be a basic rule about anything?  Is nothing impossible in your world?

[MileHigh]

The only thing we know right now is that Philip has removed all references about delivering and demonstrating working "Batch B" devices by the end of March 2013 from his web page.  Also, for the first time ever, Philip has posted about setting up a European office.

Also, about ten days before he was supposed to deliver something, he posts here that he is offended and will not post again.

So it feels very uncertain right now.  That's in contrast to Philip's statements that he was certain that he would deliver working devices by the end of this month.

So we will see how this will play out.  Both the naysayers and the supporters repeat themselves over and over and there hasn't been much new to say for a long time.  We are back to waiting for results.  If we get no results then my assumption is that at some point Philip will reset the clock and state that he will have working devices for the fall of this year - a six month delay.

I am giving up on Philip if he fails to deliver anything by April 5, 2013.

[hollander]

@hollander.i cant post a diagram of this high-powered self-charging capacitor as it is not patented yet.this thing is potentialy worth a fortune to the electronics industry(imagine tv remotes that dont need a battery,ever or imagine a torch that you dont have to wind up or shake,ever).any corporations intrested in further research&development can email me mariosguevara@gmail.com

mmm.... "i can't say more because of a pending patent"... I have already heard it. Sorry, but can you post a video on youtube of your device working, without disclosing the working principle? It would be enough to feed our curiosity.

[profitis]

@hollander.yeah sure.i just posted a vid on this forum.go chek it out under the heading,'self-charging cap'.please note that the power that you see in the vid is coming from just a few square millimeters of crudely prepared active electrode area so when properly manufactured its power will go up by a factor of at least ten per unit surface area.