quentron.com

[profitis]

now you see,dear audience, why i tend to get a tad bit angry around the poster sarkeizen.he loves to steer conversations anywhere but ontopic. wikipedia oxygen concentration cell @sarkeizen:google it. Kindly ask me a question pertaining to it and it alone.it is used in that article to describe its effect upon iron corrosion.experience tells us it is impossible to permanently flatten or kill this electric cell. 

[sarkeizen]

Kindly ask me a question pertaining to it and it alone..

If...whatever you're talking about that you refuse to define...is important to the discussion.  Then you really haven't said why or made a case for it.  I'll be sure to get back to it when you do - which will be never.

While your original point is at least somewhat falsifiable (which is probably why you ran like crazy from arguing about it), your second point is a common logical fallacy called an argument from ignorance.  Which is why it's valueless.

Oh and I got the textbook, the page you mentioned doesn't have the cite you mentioned.  So....can you post a photo of the page with the page number from your textbook?

[profitis]

its valueless to demand that you show how kelvins statement fits in with an electrochemical cell mentioned in wikipedia?ludicrous.heres a diagram of it below seperate from its context in the wikipedia article in which the two platinum electrodes are iron electrodes. My argument is that you cant show us how kelvin statement functions here to destroy it because it doesnt use kelvins statement to function.the temperature is 25celcius,the system standardized in one molar electrolyte.again i ask,kindly ask questions pertaining to this cell @sarkeizen. What is the first sentence in your book under section titled 'nernst equation'.i want to see if you really have that book.

[sarkeizen]

its valueless to demand that you show how kelvins statement fits in with an electrochemical cell mentioned in wikipedia?ludicrous.

Sorry, you're making an argument from ignorance.  It's a really, really common logical flaw.  I could show you if you allowed questions about your argument but you don't....oh well.

heres a stupid diagram of nothing relevant

Thanks.  I'll file it with the others.

ask questions pertaining to this cell @sarkeizen.

Again, logic says that your argument is of zero value.  Are you saying I should spend time on something of zero value?  Seems like that would only confuse you further.

What is the first sentence in your book under section titled 'nernst equation'.i want to see if you really have that book.

The page number you gave me doesn't say "Nerst Equation" on it anywhere.  Nor can I find that in the book. Can you post a photo of your book to prove that it is?  Please include the page number in the photo.  That way I can look it up.

[profitis]

its ignorant to ask you to show evidence of kelvin behaviour in a cell mentioned in wikipedia?preposterous. Its of zero value to ask you to show evidence of kelvin behaviour in a cell mentioned in wikipedia? Mad. I dont believe you @sarkeizen,please quote us the first sentence under section 'nernst equation' there in your book.i want to see if its same as mine.i suspect you are attempting to stall publicly answering your own questions. We demand that you ask questions pertaining to the mentioned wikipedia battery and related batteries and not deviate or distort from the pertinent subject here..