quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

its ignorant to ask you to show evidence of kelvin behaviour in a cell mentioned in wikipedia?preposterous

It's irrelevant to the point at hand.  Again I can prove it but again you allow no questioning of your dogma.  So, at this time I can not help you.

I dont believe you

Logic does not care what you believe, sadly I am right an you are wrong but as your religion allows no questions whatsoever of your premise....

please quote us the first sentence under section 'nernst equation' there in your book

I told you, it's not on that page and I can't find it in the book.  So I'm beginning to believe you are faking.  I can easily show you the page *you* told me it was on but you are completely unable to show me yours isn't that suspicious?

wikipedia battery

No idea what that is.  You have not provided a definition or any information as to why it's important.  Again, if I had information I could help.  Sadly...because of you....I do not.

and not deviate or distort from the pertinent subject here..

That's your job.  Seriously, if this equation is on a page I can't find all you would have to do is post a photo of your page - at least I'd have a chance of finding the page by flipping through.   That would take you no time at all and would be of zero cost to you but as we both know.  You don't have a copy of this book.

You've been lying.

(again)

[profitis]

@sarkeizen: WE THE GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY DEMAND THAT YOU THEORETICALY DEMONSTRATE THE ROLE OF KELVIN STATEMENT INSIDE THE WIKIPEDIA OXYGEN CONCENTRATION CELL. WE DEMAND IT NOW. you are lying about that textbook,it was stolen like i said it would be and it didnt arrive.go on,quote the sentence @sarkeizen,prove to us that its the same then i,l put a photo up ok?deal?

[sarkeizen]

@sarkeizen: WE THE LAUGHABLY STUPID DEMAND

ROFL back to this again...I've said that your argument is a logical fallacy.  My ability or inability to state something does not correlate with it's truth.

THE WIKIPEDIA OXYGEN CONCENTRATION CELL

Still no idea what this is.

you are lying about that textbook,it was stolen like i said it would be and it didnt arrive.go on,quote the sentence @sarkeizen,prove to us that its the same then i,

I can't give you a sentence from a page I can't find.  I can give you the first sentence from the page you did reference but the formula that you're talking about isn't there.

l put a photo up ok?deal?

Oh please.  You can't put up a photo because you don't have the textbook, remember?

[profitis]

A) it correlates directly with truth because you have to defend kelvin statement in order to attack kelvin-attackers.B)its the last cell diagrammed in this thread.everything under standard conditions except oxygen concentrations.C)does your book have a section titled 'nernst equation'.check in the index.D)oh yes i do but i dont believe you do @sarkeizen.post a photo of the page so that we can see that your telling the truth then.i,l post a photo after.

[sarkeizen]

A) it correlates directly with truth because you have to defend kelvin statement in order to attack kelvin-attacker

Nope.  That's an argument from ignorance.  Again, this is an age old logical fallacy. Look it up, if you doubt it.

B)its the last cell diagrammed in this thread.everything under standard conditions except oxygen concentrations.

Sorry, no idea what that diagram represents. 

C)does your book have a section titled 'nernst equation'.check in the index

I did.  Can't see one.

.D)oh yes i do but i dont believe you do

Think about it.  I realize that thinking is something you almost never do but.  When you first gave the cite and I didn't have the book.  Why not post a photo of the page?  Then make your argument.  It would have got to your point a lot quicker.  If you're trying to make your point.  Then nothing would have made it more quickly than to post a pic and say: "Well until your copy gets here, why don't we work from this".  However you didn't. 

@sarkeizen.post a photo of the page so that we can see that your telling the truth

You are the only one who lies here.  Not only that you do it entirely without conscience.

then.i,l post a photo after.

Shhhh....you don't have the textbook remember.