quentron.com

[profitis]

 @sarkeizen grrrrrr

[MarkE]

@mark E.the one minute video didnt show the hidden magnets and watch-battery and undercarpet cable either,whats a video really worth to those who dont want to replicate?that video was just intended to show its potential power/unit area at the top of its repeatable discharge curve,thats why i didnt hold the wires down too long.its a scary amount of power for a concentration cell but understandable when you think of the effective concentration difference of hydrogen in platinum group metal surfaces(including nickel) compared to silver,gold which hardly adsorb any.its equivalent to thousands atmospheres pressure difference in concentration between the surfaces and thats the driving force for hydrogen spillover between the two electrodes and hydrogen spillover in general.atomic hydrogen shifting electrochemicaly from anode to cathode.recombination occuring on the cathode at a rate x.

Profitis the video was something that you linked when I asked for an example of a battery supposedly recharging itself.  The video did not demonstrate a discharge curve.  It did not demonstrate the cell's maximum power point and therefore maximum power capability.  What the demonstration did appear to show was that the cell at least had the small amount of power capability required to deflect the meter movement. 

If it is your intent to defend your claim that there are batteries that recharge themselves you need strong evidence for that extraordinary claim.

If it is your intent to defend your claim that Karpen cells violate the Second Law by removing heat from their immediate environment, then again you need strong evidence for that extraordinary claim.  At least that claim operating at room temperature can be tested without great difficulty.  Mr. Hardcastle's claim presents a difficult experiment design challenge because of the high temperature condition that his idea requires and the associated heat leakage issues.

[sarkeizen]

@sarkeizen grrrrrr

So in other words you concede the point?  You can't take an ordinary textbook and make your argument.

Well, you could have admitted that sooner instead of being an asshole about it.

[profitis]

@mark E put me in your lab and pay me in dollars(not south african rands) and you,l see my real intent :-).im just here for mental stimulation to see if anyone can rise to my challenge and point out exactly where and how any one of my diagrammed cells will run out of juice.no one has yet risen to that challenge.no one has even risen to my challenge over 2 wikipedia instances nevermind my designs.yes i agree that it will be very easy for you to determine if the suggested higher power devices are kelvin breaches but i dont need to be convinced.i need to be un-convinced.

[profitis]

@sarkeizen lol you cant take an ordinary textbook and unmake my arguments,not even with your clients daft statement :-)