quentron.com

[sarkeizen]

lol @sarkeizen your talking such utter crap man and you know it.

All you have to do to disprove me is...

i) Copy and paste your formal argument into a post.
ii) Show that it starts with an ordinary textbook cite and ends with your conclusion "virtually all textbooks necessitate the existence of and the ability to build a battery which will power an ipod-like device continually and eternally.
iii) Each statement in-between must force the next.  That is, there is no other possible logically-valid outcome.

However you can't.    Isn't that interesting? I think it's interesting

[profitis]

geez im going to explode now,somebody please hand me a beer to chill...

[sarkeizen]

geez im going to explode now,somebody please hand me a beer to chill...

Before you explode could you...

i) Copy and paste your formal argument into a post.
ii) Show that it starts with an ordinary textbook cite and ends with your conclusion "virtually all textbooks necessitate the existence of and the ability to build a battery which will power an ipod-like device continually and eternally.
iii) Each statement in-between must force the next.  That is, there is no other possible logically-valid outcome.

I'm pretty sure you can't.

[profitis]

@sarkeizen no need to go through all that shit. Check it out: the science teacher can ask the student,'hey fran,do me a favour and go draw a diagram of an oxygen diffusion concentration cell and splain to me the thermodynamics'.the kid wouldnt have a choice but to splain the thermodynamics: electrochemical entropy at expense of temperature entropy followed by temperature entropy.repeat cycle.everyone is satisfied everyone is happy.why? Because it fits in so nicely with the textbooks (-:. Electrochemical entropy is always number one with batteries @sarkeizen.

[sarkeizen]

@sarkeizen no need to go through all that shit.

So in other words you haven't made a formal argument.  Right?  In which case you lose.  Remember my point was that you can't support your point or that you can't provide support as strong as your assertion.

A hand drawn diagram, with no cite to a textbook is clearly weaker than a formal argument stemming from a textbook cite.

Since you are clearly arguing a very, very, very strong relationship between the evidence you claim exists (but can't cite) and your conclusion.

I win.   Yawn....thanks for playing.   Moron.