quentron.com

[profitis]

statistics become the standard of evidence.have a look here: the one statement on the one overpotential cell sparked massive debate and the outcome remains in political vaccuum ie. unresolved.now the sam e statement on 100 such type devices does the same thing ie.ends in political vaccuum under file 'unresolved'.  Don't you think its beginning to look statisticaly unresolvable @sarkeizen? Why?

[sarkeizen]

statistics become the standard of evidence.

You know, just once it wouldn't hurt if you attempted to learn something about what you're talking about.  Instead of just making shit up. Statistics is about the analysis and presentation of data.  A standard of evidence is about what evidence is sufficient to accept a hypothesis.

For example:

A P-Value is a statistic representing the probability that say a sample mean would be as extreme as one you have measured.
A standard of evidence is considering a P-value of 0.05 is sufficient to reject the null-hypothesis.

So again, are we talking about statistics or a standard of evidence.  Moron.

[profitis]

Standard of evidence,,why are scientists that you consult on this issue at home and scientists around here eg markE unable to resolve this issue mr sarkeizen..doesn't that raise alarm bells for you,or suspicion.or at least motive to declare something highly unusual if not evidencial going on here.why can they not tell us when a overpotential differential device is going to run flat mr sarkeizen.

[sarkeizen]

Standard of evidence,,

Please describe the standard which you believe makes a hypothesis highly likely.  This should be a list of criteria, not some moronic narrative.

[profitis]

1)The first pile sparked debate many many years ago.it continues today,unresolved.2)the other piles have been brought to the threads attention many many months ago,the same problem,unresolved.3)the anti2lot hypothesis about the unresolvedness remains unresolved.4)the piles exist.5) the whole class of piles exist and are still coming into existance.6)there is not a single unusual thing in the first half of the hypothesis,only the 2nd half declaring a 2lot violation.6 reasons to take the hypothesis more serious @sarkeizen.at least more serious,don't you think?