quentron.com

[MarkE]

Instead of standing there and laughing why don't you help me disprove my sweeping statement @markE.help me to crash my own statement mr fellow scientist.

LOL.

[sarkeizen]

so its more rational to ignore a sweeping statement on over 100 batteries of the same class than to tackle it headon?

I am tackling a question head on and it's one you asked me: "What standard of evidence would be sufficient for me to believe in a Maxwell's Demon device".

I must say I had forgotten how much fun it is to watch you squirm.  (You have shifted your argument about four times after asking me this one quesiton).

Thanks for the entertainment!   Please keep saying stupid things.

[profitis]

And so it goes dear audience.mr E will stand there laughing and mr sarkeizen will continue evading.meanwhile....my statement gathers more power..the political vaccuum increases.. What,dear audience,fuels a whole class of sealed karpen batteries?anyone?

[sarkeizen]

So then what kind of evidence would satisfy you that demons exist @sarkeizen. What are your standards for evidence

Just to refresh your memory.   This is the question you asked.  I'm interested in discussing this.  Especially if there's some alternate standard of evidence which is equal or better than my "provide a formal argument...".

You seem to think there is a better standard but I'm hesitant to take advice on hypothesis testing from someone who hasn't completed a first year stats course. 

I'm sure you understand.

[profitis]

Remember how the karpen device and blueprint sparked a massive debate a few years ago when it hit the net mr sarkeizen. That debate still continues to this day,the one guy says its vibration,the other guy says its radiowaves,the other guy says its a 2lot discrepency,karpen himself declares it a 2lot discrepency etc etc. Now my question to you is this; what wouldve happened if the power density of that device was ten times higher,just ten times higher,how would that have,in your opinion, affected the outcome of the debate..