Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



quentron.com

Started by Philip Hardcastle, April 04, 2012, 05:00:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 32 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: profitis on June 12, 2014, 10:46:51 AM
Electrochemical thermodynamic downhill gradient 1)charged capacitor. Electrostatic downhill gradient 2) leak across the vaccuum @mark E. Why would the two pieces be sitting seperately neutraly charged in the first place if they were going to be stable in a seperately charged state.
It is up to you to state your argument.  You need to specify the states and then show that the system can move from either one to the other. 

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on June 12, 2014, 10:27:45 AM
Where's the irreversability here
Don't know.  I'm not an expert at converting a  picture into your homework assignment (which you keep asking people to do for you).

If you have a formal argument then stop hiding it.  If you've forgotten what a formal argument is.  Then ask and I'll define it.

profitis

My argument is this @mark E: why would two chunks of metal sit neutral facing each other across a vaccuum when they are supposed to be more happy charged and facing each other across a vaccuum.the stench of reversability is hanging thick over this scenario.I'm saying they are more happy in a neutral state than a charged state.unless you want to point out where I'm wrong..

profitis

My formal argument is that you won't be able to give a damning reason for nonprofitable irreversability in that spillover diagram other than declaring 2lot inviolable @sarkeizen.

MarkE

Quote from: profitis on June 12, 2014, 11:49:38 AM
My argument is this @mark E: why would two chunks of metal sit neutral facing each other across a vaccuum when they are supposed to be more happy charged and facing each other across a vaccuum.the stench of reversability is hanging thick over this scenario.I'm saying they are more happy in a neutral state than a charged state.unless you want to point out where I'm wrong..
Are you really that daft?  Once again:  In order for you to show the thermodynamic reversibility that you claim then you have to:  identify the two thermodynamic states that you allege are reversible, AND show how the system can freely move from the first state to the second AND the second state to the first all by itself. 

If by this: 
QuoteI'm saying they are more happy in a neutral state than a charged state.
You seem to be saying that the system seeks a favored state.  If so, then it is not reversible.