Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



quentron.com

Started by Philip Hardcastle, April 04, 2012, 05:00:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: profitis on June 12, 2014, 07:59:56 AM
I can put the whole issue  to you another way @mark E.do the two metallic pieces need to be in contact to fully charge up.yes or no.
Are you ever going to put forth an argument to support your claim?

MarkE

Quote from: profitis on June 12, 2014, 07:00:58 AM
You know its number 3 @mark E.I don't understand why your beating around the bush and I assure you your going to struggle to show irreversability. I've shown reversability by using wikipedias assertion against you ie, the thing spontaneously charges up as is evident in the diagrams,wikipedia says it will now spontaneously charge down when switch is opened.so either it will remain permanently charged on open switch or it won't.if it doesn't then its blatantly obviously reversable. I'm suspecting mr hardcastle will mention something about electric fields over the vaccuum gap making it irreversable but if he is going to say this then I want to know why the two pieces needed contact in the first place.
OK, so it's your argument that the configuration forms a capacitor.  And it is your argument that the capacitor leaks.  Now:  show your thermodynamic states and how the system is able to move between either state to the other. 

sarkeizen

Quote from: profitis on June 12, 2014, 05:18:30 AM
It cannot even be defeated on logical grounds mr sarkeizen
Two interesting consequences of that statement:

i) Philip can not provide an argument against it.  Since one would assume that you would listen to Philip's argument because it is logical.
ii) You know of a formal logical argument (from an ordinary text) which proves your belief.

If ii) is true, then your only accomplishment was to kept your argument secret.

As I've said, it's unsurprising if I can not defeat arguments I've never been told. :D :D :D

profitis

Where's the irreversability here @sarkeizen.in other words what is going to change here to a degree that will prevent repetition in the profit margin. 

profitis

Electrochemical thermodynamic downhill gradient 1)charged capacitor. Electrostatic downhill gradient 2) leak across the vaccuum @mark E. Why would the two pieces be sitting seperately neutraly charged in the first place if they were going to be stable in a seperately charged state.