quentron.com

[MarkE]

mark E:'Are you powering your house with a Karpen pile yet?
Why not?'

Energy density issues lol.

There is a density issue alright.  And in that you have destroyed your own claims.  Thanks for playing again.

[lumen]

I have a question!
Now that there is a room temperature "Maxwell Demon", does that indicate that "Information Theory" is wrong or only some parts may be wrong?

Sarky? Your the expert.
http://www.mediafire.com/view/w3jvt0z3336f9h7/Maksvelov%20demon%20pobedjen.pdf
Just in case you don't know.

[sarkeizen]

I have a question!

It's Philip, Profitis and Lumen. A real meeting of minds...in the loosest sense of the term.  I wonder if the religious nut will show up?  Who else? "register" who just kind of makes shit up?

Now that there is a room temperature "Maxwell Demon"

To what do you refer?

Sarky? Your the expert.

Only compared to some.  For example compared to some I'm an expert in English for knowing the difference between a possessive pronoun and a contraction.

[lumen]

Sarky,
You might want to step off the high horse and check the ground just to make sure it's still there.

I thought I asked just a simple question.

[sarkeizen]

I thought I asked just a simple question.

Riddle me this.  Your knowledge of information theory is somewhere between zero and negative a million right?  Why do you suppose that you can ask a question of relevance?

Here's a better link to Fu's (ancient) paper

Yawn.  It's no more a refutation of information theory than any of the bozos here selling experimental error.  Essentially Fu claims something happened which hasn't been replicated by anyone reputable.  It's recorded in a paper (and a video) which AFAIK has never been published in a Journal even by the comparatively lax standards in China.