Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Basic Operating Principle LaFonte Pseudo Solid Technology

Started by gammarayburst, May 10, 2012, 01:31:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Low-Q

Butch,


I have lots of small cylindrical iron powder cores at work. Maybe a thousand. These cores could be used in the pseudo solid concept you're working with. Imagine a path that is slightly V shaped. Along this path there is pairs of cores in parallell, after one another, laying there in the "groove" of the path. When the magnet approach, the magnet will separate the pairs forcing each core to roll up the V shape on each side, but when the magnet has passed, the cores will roll back towards eachother again.


The inertia in the cores will delay the separation a bit but the magnetic force separates them quite quick, and gravity will slowly pull the cores together again behind the magnet. Do you see the scenario Butch?
In the front of the magnet the cores will pull greater than the pull from the cores behind it. You can stop the magnet manually, and run it backwards without re-aligning anything. The inertia in the cores will do the neccessary work for you in order to produce more forward trust than backward trust...or what do you think?


I do think only experimentally. My mind smells some fishy here - but I guess it is worth a try. I finally have my garage ready to be used to do some experiments, so I will try this myself too. And all my magnets has bee screaming for something to do the whole winter, last summer, and the winter before that...


Vidar

gammarayburst

My skills in presentation are lacking I know. I am best at concepts and theory.
Butch

gammarayburst

Quote from: Low-Q on May 21, 2012, 05:04:21 PM
Animations are good. Practical experiments are even better. In addition an explaining text with referenc to different parts, situations etc. will help.
However, when one have lots of ideas in mind at the same time, it is easier to poor all those ideas in a forum, but the inventor often forgets that his thinking is not clear to others. My logic not allways seems to make sense to others. Butch have a little to learn about educational approach to members. But one cannot be a creative inventor AND have educational skills to make others understand clearly what you're doing :-))
My personal experience is tha I now is more able to "read" Butch' mind, if you know what I mean. I see a drawing, the comment "See attached", and I understand the concept pretty fast. Maybe because I'm also a creative inventor - thinking in the same ways as he does ;-))) What do you think Butch?
I move so fast with my ideas that I can't keep up with presentation quality like I should. I have no presentation talents I know and yes you are right, people after a while learn to "read" my designs. Mark can take a 2D drawing I send him and build it with no or very few questions. It took about a year for him to get that way. I think up ideas faster than I can have them built or presented properly. There is a certain magic in this pseudo solid design I posted here. I hope people can see the very clear overunity potential in it. It is just a matter of engineering the test fixture for self running.
Butch

gammarayburst

Quote from: Low-Q on May 21, 2012, 05:22:20 PM
Butch,


I have lots of small cylindrical iron powder cores at work. Maybe a thousand. These cores could be used in the pseudo solid concept you're working with. Imagine a path that is slightly V shaped. Along this path there is pairs of cores in parallell, after one another, laying there in the "groove" of the path. When the magnet approach, the magnet will separate the pairs forcing each core to roll up the V shape on each side, but when the magnet has passed, the cores will roll back towards eachother again.


The inertia in the cores will delay the separation a bit but the magnetic force separates them quite quick, and gravity will slowly pull the cores together again behind the magnet. Do you see the scenario Butch?
In the front of the magnet the cores will pull greater than the pull from the cores behind it. You can stop the magnet manually, and run it backwards without re-aligning anything. The inertia in the cores will do the neccessary work for you in order to produce more forward trust than backward trust...or what do you think?


I do think only experimentally. My mind smells some fishy here - but I guess it is worth a try. I finally have my garage ready to be used to do some experiments, so I will try this myself too. And all my magnets has bee screaming for something to do the whole winter, last summer, and the winter before that...


Vidar
I think I see what you are talking about. I will make a drawimg and you tell me if I am close.
Butch

gammarayburst

Quote from: gauschor on May 18, 2012, 03:32:48 PM
Thanks for these videos. You should know that it's essential to understand the thought behind all designs - in order to get others interested in the matter or letting people participate. If anyone jumps in trying to read a random LaFonte topic in this forum he will understand exactly nothing. I am still not 100% clear on this principle but with these videos (people should also watch the other videos in your channel) it makes much more sense now and one can deduct what you try to achieve with each different design.

(The whole matter should still be structured somehow like e.g. a sticky post explaining the basics of it (+ some of your videos) whereas the different designs may stay in different topics as they already are).
Maybe I should take a break and organize all my work and present it properly, but I am so bad at presentation and education with my work.
My mind just keeps jumping back to thinking about designs and concepts. I have thousands of designs and many were built and tested and videoed but it's not all on one site on the web. I can come up with two designs a day at least, but can't present them the way they need to be. What would be perfect is to have someone presenting the designs the proper way as I come up with them but that is a fantacy not something that will ever happen. This latest pseudo solid design with the plates is so clearly overunity. If I just had the resources to build it!
Maybe someone will and put it on the web. I will try anyway here with the little resources I have. The plates seperate we have proven, the magnets pull to the next closed plate set with no cogging and the cycle starts again. It's been shown in video's and it just needs to be built as a complete machine.
Butch