Simple to build isolation transformer that consumes less power than it gives out

[TinselKoala]

Did anyone actually ask the frog how it felt?

The point was that "if" you assume enough counterfactuals to be true you can "prove" anything. There is no point in speculation about conclusions when the input data isn't known.

So once again: we need to verify the circuit schematic, since the voltages cited don't seem to make sense with the schematic pictured.
Then we need to verify the _raw data_. That means that you know the schematic, you know the measurement points, and you run the test, recording numbers. Once you've got data that is real and repeatable and you know where it comes from, then you can start interpreting away, and you can generate new experiments that test .... and try to refute.... your new hypotheses, or guesses, about what is going on.

But if you don't know what the circuit is and you aren't sure of your numbers in the first place.... you've got to get that straightened out before the tower will issue your pigs their takeoff clearance.

This is not rocket science, after all. It's just.... ordinary science. Plodding ahead methodically and dispassionately letting the chips (and pigs) fall where they may.

[Jack Noskills]

My problem is that I have only watt meter and I am unable to do those measurements, so this is why I asked.

There are enough schematics already. Voltages and currents are as shown except for the U1, my mistake as 3 V was voltage drop across bulb and not between L and bulb A as forest measured it.

[TinselKoala]

Why don't you "invest" in a couple of low-cost DMMs? I got mine on sale at Harbor Freight for three dollars apiece, and they are very good performers for the price. They don't have the features of a highend DMM like my Fluke 83, but they are adequate for the kinds of measurements you are making. A Wattmeter gives you an indication of power, but power is not energy and power isn't necessarily conserved in the same way energy is. Really, if you have lots of power in short duration peaks, it's easy to make a mistake using power alone as your input and output data. Really, you need an oscilloscope, but for now, just a couple of DMMs might be worth their weight in gold, eventually.

[Jack Noskills]

Thanks for your advice. I am afraid it does not work for me though as I would need more understanding interpreting the results. I am not interested in money. 'Then why put this under overunity prize category ?' To get attention.  I am sharing everything I come across. Sometimes it is nothing, sometimes it seem to be something. There is no time for learning this stuff from point zero, this is why I came here: to share and ask for help from others that do know this stuff. To continue and advance furthe than I ever could, to get the linux effect.

I understand you have some sort of wireless electricity in your house and you have done lots of experiments so you know this inside out and backwards. You must have suitable trafo or ferrite to experiment with, any chance you could look into this in more detail ?

Couple of things are interesting. When input signal is 50 Hz, there are harmonics at 1 kHz as it was verified in the report earlier. When I put 20 kHz signal though 80000 nanoperm and use about 40 watts of power, I start to smell metal in the air almost immediately. Is it caused by the harmonics that occur shaking of copper atoms or what ? There is no heat, no sparks, just the smell. Could there be harmonics at 400 kHz or even higher ? Could you take power only from the harmonic frequency leaving driver frequency intact ?

You see I have lots of questions but cannot seek for the answers. Maybe you, or someone else see this interesting and could look for answers to benefit all of us.

[poynt99]

This is all fine and good Jack.

Just refrain from going around claiming that your circuit produces OU, when in fact no one, including yourself has proven it.

All you are doing at this point is speculating. Don't mislead people with your claims.