Simple to build isolation transformer that consumes less power than it gives out

[TinselKoala]

OK, Tinsel... and so on.

Obviously, you really did your homework.
Obviously, you are very knowledgeable.
Obviously, you are a very good experimenter.
Obviously, you are a very clever individual.
Obviously your English is far better than mine (of coarse)...

However, my French is execrable, much worse than your English. But you knew that already, didn't you.

Obviously, (IMO, )) your EGO is as huge as the Fujiyama.
I have a great respect for you but I do not like you.
I also do not fear you (at all) BTW.

I cannot express how very heartbroken I am that you do not like me. After all, my ego requires that everyone love me unconditionally. If they do not, I immediately have to make myself a cup of strong coffee and watch a TeleTubbies episode to regain my composure.

Obviously, you have not answered my simple question:
Was your very running on magnets only motor a fake?

Obviously, your question isn't simple at all, and of course it has been answered many times. If you are referring to the Overconfident OCMPMM, I really cannot recall the inventor, Overconfident (may he rest in peace), ever making any claims of overunity performance for that device. None of the demonstrations that I have seen, and I have seen many, require the assumption of overunity or extraordinary behaviour of any kind to explain. Only if you are _looking_ for an overunity device, will you think you _see_ one.

Obviously, Backwarding 'things/names/etc... is a Satanic way.
What is your (hidden) agenda?

Le bonjour vous va, cher Monsieur,
Jean-Yves

On the contrary, "backwarding" or anagramming things/names/etc. has nothing at all to do with Satan... because you see, friend Jean-Yves.... Satan does not exist. Obviously.... there is evil in the hearts of men, that is certain... but it is perfectly human, not supernatural at all.

However.... as a thing is viewed, so it appears.  If you believe that I am somehow evil or Satanic, based on the fact that my internet alias is an anagram of my mother's maiden name, Stella Nokia ....... I believe that says more about you, than it does about me.



ETA: Sorry, I forgot to answer your question. If I have an agenda, it's not hidden at all. I want people to stop making silly mistakes !! It would also please me to see them learning to use their test equipment effectively.

[T-1000]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrDMT6lSeEo

Now if you add this resonant LC circuit as transformer in series to another transformer and make current phase difference from voltage more than 90 degrees, the funny part begins

To take out reactive power, you will probably need either current transformer or transformer with bifilar layers interconnected primary for maximum voltage in LC part and capacitor like winding in secondary for maximum current output. When current separation from voltage is done, it is all good.

[JouleSeeker]

TinselKoala (clever name, as Jean pointed out) wrote on p. 10:

here I demonstrate ZERO wires power transfer, NOT broadcast, at high efficiencies, using AIR CORE resonant coupling, extracting LARGE AMOUNTS of real power from the reactive power in the power supply to perform useful work, apparently violating inverse-square falloff with distance and providing a "hook" or path by which other energies might enter the system from elsewhere...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIC47PN1-ys
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK90_CbnAeY

Intriguing vids, would like to understand better.  In your "supernova mode", the bulbs are very bright but the input power is also high.  I see that and the frequency shift for this SN mode - but what is going on here?  some sort of resonance-coupling, or what?  Pls explain.

The titles with these vids includes the term "electric OU"... Are you claiming OU?   (I think not; but would appreciate the clarification of the term "electric OU".  Indeed-are you measuring output power, quantitatively, or could you?)


PS -- I like your term "photocalorimeter" -- this is what I've been practicing with my calibrated light-box.

[wattsup]

@TK

Don't fret about name calling members.

Even thought this is not @JN relevant, your videos with Tx and Rx effects is just great.

I have questions about your set-up.

1) On the Tx side,  since your voltage reading does not change (fixed voltage applied) and only your amp readings is increasing in certain conditions. So where is the amps read in series?

2) If the voltage reading is parallel to the Tx circuit feed and the amps is in series with the same location, I would like to know if in your Tx circuit after the feed, is there any full bridge rectifier that is isolating any possible return from your Tx coil back towards the feed side that may be the cause of the increase in amperage reading.

Meaning, is it possible, if this is DC pulsed Tx, that the receiver receives this DC pulsed Tx, hence a signal that goes on and off is exchanged, but when the Tx is on, the Rx is off, and when the Tx is off, the Rx is on. If this is the case then this may explain your Nova mode where when the Tx if off, the Rx is transmitting to the Tx, and when the Tx is on, the Tx is transmitting to the Rx so in essence is it possible that both Tx and Rx are both Tx-ing and RX-ing to each other in a loop that produces the Nova mode.

3) In your video, while you were playing with the third loop on the left of the Tx or between the Tx and the Rx and this increased the Rx fan speed, I could not help but realize you were showing, in a way, @otto's ECD function were all that is missing in yours is a mobius loop were half is Tx and half is Rx that feed each other to increase output. (Maybe a bad flash in the brain but when you were adjusting the third loop distances, @otto's ECD just jumped out at me given his loops had about the same distances.

When @otto was doing his ECD experiments, he had reported that under certain conditions his power supply voltage and amperage readings were just going haywire. I have seen this happen many times myself but we know this is not indicative of a dramatic increase in power consumption but rather the voltage and amperage readings were showing a high return of flyback from the pulsed device.

I guess the base question is...

4) How does the Tx side realize it needs more power as seen by the increase in the amperage readings you are showing under certain conditions? That is a big one to ask.

wattsup

PS: @JouleSeeker

Just saw your post that is in the same line as mine.

[TinselKoala]

TinselKoala (clever name, as Jean pointed out) wrote on p. 10:
Intriguing vids, would like to understand better.  In your "supernova mode", the bulbs are very bright but the input power is also high.  I see that and the frequency shift for this SN mode - but what is going on here?  some sort of resonance-coupling, or what?  Pls explain.

It was not my intention to "hijack" this interesting thread. However, it does seem that my work lately has been relevant to this thread's topic and that of one or two others.
I too would like to understand the phenomena that I illustrate in the video. I believe that there is some mutual influence, mutual coupling, that alters the resonant frequency of both the sender and the receiver until they are mutually resonating. It could be happening in just the receivers or in both units; I have some videos where I can get the SN mode in one receiver without affecting the performance of others at all.
The system operates at a minimum of about 500 kHz though, so the sizes of the loops are really too small for "antenna" type effects to happen, I think. The "swr" match must be terrible, and this may be part of why it performs the way it does.

The titles with these vids includes the term "electric OU"... Are you claiming OU?   (I think not; but would appreciate the clarification of the term "electric OU".  Indeed-are you measuring output power, quantitatively, or could you?)


PS -- I like your term "photocalorimeter" -- this is what I've been practicing with my calibrated light-box.

Indeed I can measure output power quantitatively, but it requires some definition. Would you like to know the reactive power circulating in the transmitting loop? It is quite large, involving an oscillation at between 500 kHz and 1 MHz of 40-60 v p-p and high peak currents. This is "recycled" accumulated or stored power though, like the spin of a flywheel. The transmitting loop, which is at minimum 2 or 3 strands of solid #12 house wiring, gets perceptibly warm during prolonged operation.
Would you like to know the RF radiated power? It depends on the input voltage of course, and is close to (but below, of course) the input DC power. Would you like to know the power levels received by a receiver? This is the easiest to measure and of course depends greatly on the position of the receiving loop wrt the sender. The brilliance of the bulbs is one indicator, as is the speed and torque of the electric motor when used; less visible is the temperature of the receiving capacitor which does get quite warm during operation. I have not done precise quantitative measurements of the power dissipated in the bulbs using the photocalorimetric method yet, I'm still trying to figure out what some "standard conditions" might be.

Electric OU? What do I mean by placing such a term in the titles of these videos? No, of course I am not claiming that this device, OR ANY OTHER DEVICE that I have examined under that title is presently exhibiting overunity performance.
What do people mean when, on this forum, they title threads with things like "self running" or "game changing OU device to hit market in (last) October" or "consumes less power than it puts out"? Do we think these titles are misleading, or not? Have we ever actually seen a self running device, or one that consumes less than it puts out, or one that's on the market? I don't think so.
In my case, I mean that I believe that my work is relevant to some of the things I see here, relating to the search for electrical devices that do exhibit unusual performance. After all, my devices like this present wireless system, or my various Tesla Coils and magnet motors like the Marinov Slab..... do exhibit _behaviours_ that people here sometimes mistake for OU performance. And of course, when I examine the work of others involving claims of electrical OU, those explorations will generally appear under that heading in my videos.

But you may find the alt.snakeoil Video Reports more interesting in the long run--- although no real snake oil actually makes its appearance in any of them.