Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Simple to build isolation transformer that consumes less power than it gives out

Started by Jack Noskills, July 03, 2012, 08:01:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 48 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hope

That small 2-3% efficiency gain might be had if we wound the coils differently.  The only coil I have ever heard of verified to have the highest know loss-less was 60 + percent above all other coils and this was the Rodin Coil.  Though it's field is compressed and centered (focused) can we also use this idea to boost (by containing) our coils emanations.


This project is interesting and may from using two identical (polarized) coils as primary splits and another two coils identical (polarized)to re-combine in the secondaries.  Would our gains improve yet again?

e2matrix

Quote from: wattsup on August 11, 2012, 10:44:31 AM
@JS

I had been thinking the same thing for days now but have not mustered the courage to try it, fearing a major short and system wide burn out. lol

But come to think of it, I think I mentioned this before that when the standard circuit was running and the bulb was lit at its regular load position, I had scoped each side of the load and found that one side was a good four times higher in voltage then the other side of the load. That seems rather unorthodox for an AC output that should be alternating at the same level from both sides. So maybe the side with the lower output can receive the ground negative.

I am just scared of trying it because the mains line has some good amperage there that could shoot up real fast.

wattsup
Think F-u-s-e  ... I know you know what that is :)  maybe 2 amp?   
I've seen two lines of thought on the concept of having a ground.  One says you can't get overunity with anything that is grounded.   The other says that ground can provide a source of electrons making overunity possible.  I think both may be correct depending on the type of circuit. 

penno64

Hi Wattsup,

Thank you so much for the easily understood explamation and link.

I have for the last 6 months, being trying as you have hinted, to use the beheaded mots
with what started out as romero/muller generator. It is surprisingly easy to get a high voltage
from a mot used as a gen coil, but near impossible to get any useful current.

It seems that the spacing of the mags and the gaps of the mot tend to give a resonable glide
for the rotor. All mags facing same way.

Once more, thank you, Penno

a.king21

Quote from: wattsup on August 11, 2012, 10:44:31 AM
@JS

I had been thinking the same thing for days now but have not mustered the courage to try it, fearing a major short and system wide burn out. lol

But come to think of it, I think I mentioned this before that when the standard circuit was running and the bulb was lit at its regular load position, I had scoped each side of the load and found that one side was a good four times higher in voltage then the other side of the load. That seems rather unorthodox for an AC output that should be alternating at the same level from both sides. So maybe the side with the lower output can receive the ground negative.

I am just scared of trying it because the mains line has some good amperage there that could shoot up real fast.

wattsup

A high voltage will always flow into a low voltage. You don't even need a diode.  What do you think would happen if you looped it?  Do you think you would create an infinity loop Kapanadze style?  If so I recommend you put a load in series prior to connection, and just to be on the safe side put a spark gap across the load to act as a current limiter.

wattsup

@penno64

No problem.
I found this thread on another forum that may give some insight into MOTs.
http://www.practicalmachinist.com/vb/general/transformer-core-weld-186550/

I was thinking further about using a beheaded MOT on a magwheel, and maybe it will be better to also cut away the side laminations (that is one hell of a job) so only the square center core is facing the rotating magnets. The sidewall laminations may be moving the magnetic impress to the outer end of the coil and now when the magnet is at the center it has to revert it back and this may be causing undue losses. Even if the MOT is placed with sidewalls facing up and down, that extra flux movement may be causing undue cancellation effects.

@JN/@JS

Could not help myself so I took my new transformers and re-did your circuit.
I have a very thick wire that is connected to the house 3/4" copper ground pipe that comes to my desk for quick earth grounding.

So while the trans are outputting I put the ground to either of the output leads to the bulb and nothing changes at all. My ground has effect on devices so I know it is a good enough ground but maybe not good enough for this test. Don't know.

wattsup