Unipolar Induction - Relative motion isn't needed!

[gravityblock]

In 1988 Prof Francisco J. Muller completed a series of experiments, substituting Faraday's rotating disk and magnet by a filamentary circuit, one portion of which is immersed in a magnetic field (inside a gap between ceramic magnets) while the other remains outside the magnetic field. (The field is confined within iron plates).  By introducing a capacitive branch he could demonstrate that the induction occurs, indeed, in the wire that moves with the magnet, without need of relative motion. A variation of the experiment in rectilinear fashion makes this anti-relativistic conclusion totally unavoidable, invalidating the recourse to General Relativity. A list of other publications by Muller can be found at the World Science Database.

For the rotational case in Figure 1 there is a potential difference induced between O and R due to the ABSOLUTE ROTATION of the system, in-spite of the absence of relative motion between the magnet and wire.  In Figure 1, all of the velocities are parallel or tangential to the magnetic edges.  For the translational case in Figure 2 there is no induction between O and R.  In figure 2, the B field is the same, the speeds also are similar, and no relative motion exists as in Figure 1. Why the difference?

In Figure 1, all of the velocities are parallel or tangential to the magnetic edges.  In figure 2, most of the velocities have components perpendicular to those edges.  As a result, in Figure 2 the edges of the magnet produce magnetic "storms" by motion through space (an absolute effect) which are equivalent to negative (VxB) effects.  The latter cancels the positive (VxB) fields thus yielding zero net induction.  In summary, we can have induction without relative motion between a local magnet and wire by avoiding all transversal edges, even in the case of rectilinear (inertial) motion.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

A circularly rotating SQF (Space-Quanta-Flux or magnetic field):

According to the authors of a publication titled, "Central Oscillator and Space-Quanta-Medium" in Chapter 15 on page 148 & 149, a voltage can be measured using a non-moving contact with a rotating magnet and a stationary conductor disk during the acceleration and/or deceleration phase (which must be carried out rather quickly).  However, at a constant rotational velocity a stationary flow is formed (as with a non-rotating magnet) again around the free conductor-electrons and therefore no voltage can be measured.  According to the Monstein-Effect, the flow intensity (and thus the magnetic field strength of the permanent magnet) of the SQF changes when rotating the permanent magnet as opposed to the resting state (depending on the direction of rotation, the rotational velocity and the magnetic field strength).

Videos:

The Oliver Crane's Theory of the Universe
Space Quantum Field Flux or RQSm
Hooper-Monstein Explanation and Experiment from RQM

Gravock

[gravityblock]

The image below is a snapshot of the Oliver Crane and RQM view of the magnetic field along with the conventional view.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

A circularly rotating SQF (Space-Quanta-Flux or magnetic field):

According to the authors of a publication titled, "Central Oscillator and Space-Quanta-Medium" in Chapter 15 on page 148 & 149, a voltage can be measured using a non-moving contact with a rotating magnet and a stationary conductor disk during the acceleration and/or deceleration phase (which must be carried out rather quickly).  However, at a constant rotational velocity a stationary flow is formed (as with a non-rotating magnet) again around the free conductor-electrons and therefore no voltage can be measured.  According to the Monstein-Effect, the flow intensity (and thus the magnetic field strength of the permanent magnet) of the SQF changes when rotating the permanent magnet as opposed to the resting state (depending on the direction of rotation, the rotational velocity and the magnetic field strength).

Gravock

A Brush-less Unipolar Generator:

If a voltage is induced during the acceleration and/or deceleration phases in a stationary disc by a rotating magnet, then a brush-less generator is possible.   We can extract the current from the stationary disc with a non-moving contact (brush-less).  We can have a constant change in velocity by alternating the acceleration/deceleration phases between magnets on separate shafts (--N- Disc -S--).

Gravock

[gravityblock]

A Brush-less Unipolar Generator:

If a voltage is induced during the acceleration and/or deceleration phases in a stationary disc by a rotating magnet, then a brush-less generator is possible.   We can extract the current from the stationary disc with a non-moving contact (brush-less).  We can have a constant change in velocity by alternating the acceleration/deceleration phases between magnets on separate shafts (--N- Disc -S--).

Gravock

No Counter Torque or BEMF:

If the rate of deceleration is matched to the rate of acceleration or vice versa, then I don't see any BEMF or counter torque associated in this particular setup.  If this configuration works as a generator, but won't work as a motor, then there can be no opposing forces at play.  I don't see how this configuration can work both as a generator and as a motor.

Gravock