Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[Pascuser]

File concerning the pigtail and its effect concerning gravity anomalies (french version only for now):
http://zedico.info/Extraits_Publics/Pascuser/queue_de_cochon.pdf

[Pascuser]

@Pascuser:

In your video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxFZmGKP4UI and in Naudin's tests http://jnaudin.free.fr/rvproject/html/ugentest6.htm I see that

one needs a very high input (into the U-shaped coil) in order to get a small output (via the light bulb at the copper tubes).

In Naudin's test the input is about 6 Watt (205 mA at 29,5 Volt) and the output (via the lamp) is about 0,6 Watt (100 mA at 6 Volt).

The fact that the input does not change (in Naudin's test) whether the lamp is connected or not is interesting but can not prove OU.

So, my question: Why do you claim OU?

Greetings, Conrad

P.S.: Imagine a radio station (radio wave transmitter). The power input to the radio station does not change whether the people turn on their radios (radio wave receivers) or not.

Sorry, I yet said that I did not spend more time to explain what was yet explained.

Naudin did not measure overunity yet. Mosfet drivers dissipates much power in his amplifier (very hot). What goes inside the input is NOT what is consumed and dissipated by the mosfet to feed the input. This is obvious for every measurement: when you power on your oscilloscope to measure the voltage accross a circuit and calculate what is its consumption, you don't add the oscilloscope consumption of 100Watts to the consumption you are measuring of 1watt to say "it consumes 101 Watt".

You don't seem to have ever measured a COP in any device system for somebody bored with new systems because you have studied so much old systems.

If you don't believe int his device, don't ask about. If you want to have overunity, do the replication. All was explained in the french document as to do the device and to have overunity. I won't reply anymore about it if you don't make it. No replication = no explaination to give. Consider this is not an interesting experiment for you if what was given is not good for you.

If you have something to replicate, I will with pleasure help to tune and measure, if not, don't ask, as YET mentionned. Thanks. I am not a data bank to inform you about how electricity works, what is a power, what you must do or not, what you don't understand in Naudin measurements, etc because it is not my job. You must be a little bit skilled in electricity to know what you do. If not, wait that another one does it and watch what he will find, with no comment about what he did is wrong only because you don't know what must be done.

With no anger, but as yet mentionned NO time to spend for what is not important.

What os more, your example of radio station shows that you did not understand what Naudin did. The purpose was to show that output was not a derivation of input by a capacitive way between winding and U copper bar. In a radio station you don't ask this question. This WAS not a overunity measurement. Sorry that all this is writtend in french, but I won't do more about this. Wait further Naudin tests.

[Pascuser]

I pluged again my U autogenerateur overunity electric generator, replication of Richard VIALLE's one.
I made COP measurements since I never made COP measurements with the U only with the linear autogenerateur (1st version).

Measurements and experiments are rrported here:
http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=922

I could clearly show a COP>1 and the way you can choose to have the COP value you want.
In a first experiment I have COP=1,2
In the next one I have COP=1,7
Then I show how you can have COP as big as you want, 10 or 100 or 1000 or 100 000 or 1 000 000 or infinite! Then you have something new: no COP can be calculated because now you produce energy while you are consuming.

I showed how this COP measurement is of no meaning for the new behavior of this system. You have a COP>1 but you have much more. You have a negative power production coming back to input.
This is the mechanism explaining the COP value as big as necessary: the output power is the same (diminushes slightly but little) while you diminush input power, and a production electric power comes back as a feedback to the input, and SUBSTRACTS to what you inputted.

So Your input can be reduced to as extent as you want, with an ouput slightly diminushed: so the COP=output/intput=nearly the same/what you want as nerby 0 as you want = infinity if you want.

This is for COP measurement and everybody can do it like me. You need to build the U generator, an oscillocope (with a ground isolated from earth, either a PC based oscilloscope with no ground or a classic standard oscilloscope with a ground transformer to isolate from earth ground) and a function generator.

What is more interesting in the system is to have more output power. Since you have an infinite COP, you have the same output power (it is the reduction of input used power that produces big COP).
This is the next step that Richard VIALLE did. He produced 10Watt instead of only 100mW with an output tuning (read the document to know more). And one times he could produce 300 000V arcing back to the input accidentally. This is the work to do... to have more power; when you understand that COP is overunity.

Overunity doesn't mean that you have the output power you want, but is only a ratio (output VS inout). A overunity is yet a big victory against the science system claiming it doesn't exist. But shutting off the system is not enough if you don't have a big output power to use it at home... So a research must be done to have a bigger power.

Jean-Louis Naudin made a web page to present my last results here:
http://jnaudin.free.fr/rvproject/html/pascuser_rep1.htm

For the moment onlyfrench people are doing replication. Here I gave you infoirmations to do the same work. Again nobody asks you to understand all theory, you just have to do a replication and measure yourself. Many time wasted here in many subjects with hight cost. Here it is a low cost if you have some minimal equipement and skilled a little bit to kno what you are doing. So easy to do... but up to now only french replications.

I did not make an english translation yet of the documents, but I have no time to do all this for the moment, it will be done later. You can do the replication with a basic google translation.

As yet told here, I am here to present something that you can DO yourself.

[conradelektro]

Thank you Pasuser for presenting your measurements.

I think I understand now better what you are talking about.

But I do not see a way to exploit this "U autogenerateur" in any practical way. The generation of the input signal (which you are doing with a function generator and Naudin is doing with a special circuit) always seems to consume more power than one can ever get out of the "U autogenerateur".

So, if the generation of the input signal would be for free, one could gain something. But this is not the case in the real world. Theoretically there would be OU, but to show it, one has to spend more power than ever comes out.

In addition I have to think longer and more carefully about the way you are doing the calculations. With 100 and 150 Ohms in the input line, one could argue, that one needs the resistor to generate the effect (so it can not be subtracted, it has to be there). And for a 1000 Ohm resister the OU still needs to be shown.

Only when the consumption of the coil (wound over the U shaped copper tube) plus the consumption of the resistor (where the measurement is done) is less than the current through the lamp, the argument becomes valid. (But still, the generation of the 3.6 MHz signal would not be for free).

Nevertheless, a very interesting effect. I hope Jean Louis Naudin does more measurements and comments on the calculation.

Greetings, Conrad

[Pascuser]

Thank you Pasuser for presenting your measurements.

I think I understand now better what you are talking about.

But I do not see a way to exploit this "U autogenerateur" in any practical way. The generation of the input signal (which you are doing with a function generator and Naudin is doing with a special circuit) always seems to consume more power than one can ever get out of the "U autogenerateur".

So, if the generation of the input signal would be for free, one could gain something. But this is not the case in the real world. Theoretically there would be OU, but to show it, one has to spend more power than ever comes out.

In addition I have to think longer and more carefully about the way you are doing the calculations. With 100 and 150 Ohms in the input line, one could argue, that one needs the resistor to generate the effect (so it can not be subtracted, it has to be there). And for a 1000 Ohm resister the OU still needs to be shown.

Only when the consumption of the coil (wound over the U shaped copper tube) plus the consumption of the resistor (where the measurement is done) is less than the current through the lamp, the argument becomes valid. (But still, the generation of the 3.6 MHz signal would not be for free).

Nevertheless, a very interesting effect. I hope Jean Louis Naudin does more measurements and comments on the calculation.

Greetings, Conrad

You are never happy with what you have. When I say that there is COP, you say it is not shown. When it is shown, you say it is useless.

But if you ever READ the doc (which is not the case because of repetitive question about the same things), YES here we show overunity but not a practical way to use it for your home!
It wad indicated in my report: this is a physic measurement.

Richard VIALLE made the U autogenerateur running in a loop with no consumption of input batteries, so YES there is a practical way to generate so much overunity that you can use it to compensate all input energy dissipated in the driver circuit. I yet wrote it many times.

The self running version was delivering constant 10W output power and no depleting batteries for many months.

And YES there is a way to have much more power, like Richard VIALLE showed it accidentally with 10 centimeters of spark on the input.

If conradelecktro is the only one answering in this post, because he does NO replication and only spends time to speak; always unhappy of what is done (he wants me to install a running U generateur in his home?!) I will no longer feed this post.

If overunity members are not able of more than what conradelkectro does, there is no reason for me to spend more time here. There is french workers doing replication, and if you want to spend your time in your garden to watch flowers and writing messages on the internet to spend what remains of your time, this is not a forum for me.

I thought that there would be SERIOUS people here, I was mistaken obviously.

French people seems more accurate to do good work than international one as I can see. This forum is useless if nobody does something valuable with a real investment in reading documentation and thinking about what was yet written. With no serious new reactions than Conradelektro (sorry, to be serious, you must start with a reading of writings, and DO something), you won't see me here more.