Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

[dak]

Hi Khwartz ,
I'm new at this forum, english is not my native language but I can read and write.
I know the basics of electronics , electromagnetism , physics and mathematics ( I have completed 50% of electronic engineering at university) so I'm very interested in this device .
Please continue the job of the translation!!


regards!

[Khwartz]

Hi!

Having gone through materials the guys of the French forum Conspirovniscience proposed me to translate to answer to your demands here, I have already posted there a whole set of specifications for direct replication, and I am waiting now the checking and possible corrections and additional advises of the other members there before to translate and publish here.

You may wait few days, sorry for making you wait.

My own replication should follow in the next weeks too, as soon I will have the materials and équipements.

Note: While studying the materials I realise how far my citizenmates are advanced and how precised are their experiments, in adittion of having their well positive and fully disclosed results. Only one example: it has been successfully realised the continuous charge of 2 batteries alternatively AND delivering in the same time power to the load! Even if it has been made in a lobaratory of electronics and can be hardly reproduce by lack of skills in electronics, it amazes me to see how far these guys are while having had no support at the international, while so many people of very good will indeed, invest their time in far less advanced results and non completly disclosed, opensource material of fasly "humanitarian" inventors who never disclose "the main trick" (if it is not fake of course!).

I really which some of you, like you Hoppy, having good skills in electronics and serious both background and methodology, to run this thing and find the solution to reproduce what has been successfully done in laboratory and going further in the results of this well documented true o.u. phenomenon.

Regards,
Didier.

[Khwartz]

Quote from: verpies on January 21, 2014, 07:48:11 PM

Didn't JLN Naudin show the Vialle circuit anomaly is caused by ?:
- capacitive coupling,
- bad power measurements due to  inductive resistors and multiplying average AC Volts by average AC Amps which almost never equal average power.

P.S.
The concept of RMS Power makes no sense to me.
For a sine wave, RMS Voltage * RMS Current * cos(phi) = Average Power.
Why would somebody be interested in RMS Power ?

Hi Verpies.

Thanks for the note.

I know Jean-Louis has worked on it but I have not yet go through all his materials about Richard's autogen.

For RMS Amps by RMS Voltage, well, isn't it give only APPARENT POWER?

Well, as I have seen it, the experimenters of the forum of Conspirovniscience are little clever than this and I can ensure you they know the difference with REAL POWER, know how to use oscilloscopes and probes, and calculate or read a power factor.

There is a thread I have started to use to update all data and results in English, would you be agree to post your next welcome objections when based on facts [or physics], like you have just done. It will help me much to clear all them so that anybody could profit.

I will copy-paste this one too.

Regards

[Khwartz]

So, no answer? Dear Verpies

BTW, I went through a whole set of test of JNL on the Richard's autogenerator, he wrote at the end of more than ten of each either:

"Bonne construction et bonnes expériences avec cet autogénérateur en U de Richard Vialle."
-> "Good construction and good experience with this Richard Vialle's U shape autogenerator"

"Cette expérience tend à confirmer une fois de plus la théorie et l'expérience de Richard Vialle..."
-> "This experience tends to confirm once again Richard Vialle's theory and experience..."

So, JNL non conclusive on his tests on the Richard Vialle's autogenerator?!

Others excerpts:

"Nous avons précédement mesuré que la fréquence optimale de fonctionnement (lampe de charge allumée au maximum) du générateur en U de Richard Vialle est de 3.6 MHz et ce, en parfaite conformité avec son calcul théorique."
-> "We have previously measured that the optimal functioning frequency (the light bulb load lighted at maximum) of the Richard Vialle's U shaped autogenerator is 3.6 MHz and this, in perfect conformity with the theoretical calculations"


"Plus de puissance (10W) en sortie et - 4 w de puissance négative à l'entrée vec l'Autogénérateur en U"
-> "More outpower (10W) and - 4 W of negative input power with the U shape Autogenerator."


"La puissance en sortie de l'autogénérateur en U est bien là, c'est indéniable, la lampe de 10 W éclaire au maximum."
-> The power at the output of the U shape autogenerator is indeed here, it is undubitable, the light bulb glows at maximum."


Note:

These results are no more representative of the results obtained since JNL have made these experiments and tests. From only drop of power consumption under load, but true indeed in agreement with the theory, we are now on clear o.u. registring on the U shape (more power out of the 2 halves of the tube than the power feed in the coil), and less obvious and much harder to realise: making the circuit feeding the grid itself too! So TWO sources of power in the same time! I know, hard to believe but sure you may prove it for yourself; but needs skills in electronics I even do not have myself. I KNOW HERE SOME OF YOU GUYS  HAVE THE NEEDED SKILLS, so I count on you to "break" it for yourself.

I went true lot of materials. Many Frenches has indeed already and successfully replicated the overunity of the U shape, you may try with me when I will post my own replication or you can start before while I will provide the specifications for the replication, of the basic already well mastered experiment. Then, or in parallel, I wish to provide "the state of the art" on the Richard Vialle's Autogen, with the discovered "avalanche phenomenon" and possible kW of power.

Regards.

Disclaims: "I take no responsibility for any mistranslation and let the owner of any copyright to ask for any correction. Any excerpt is for informative and non profit educational purposes."

[Khwartz]

Could someone could explain, how one can get more REAL REFLECT POWER (as registered by a professional HV DIRECT AND REFLECTIVE POWER meter), than the REAL POWER injected in a supposed PASSIVE dipole like a copper pipe wound with a coil? (To be more precise: two halves of copper pipe):

http://www.conspirovniscience.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=1476

Even if you don't understand the words pictures, schematics and video, they should show you something, paticularly at the end of the vid in this page, of one of the basic experiment one can do.

Regards.