Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Richard VIALLE's new theory about negative mass and overunity

Started by Pascuser, August 28, 2012, 07:03:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

tim123

Hi Verpies,
  thanks for that very clear explanation... I think that measurements are often a source of disagreements...

So, what about that VNA project? :)

Regards, Tim

tim123

Hmmm, it appears that one of my posts didn't get posted...

I was asking Verpies for some tech help with the VNA... Will do it in a PM...

e2matrix

Quote from: Khwartz on February 07, 2014, 05:30:15 AM
Dear tim, I am since long enough in the communities to note when someone just tries to attack me or just share one's informations. There are specific traits and words used and the behaviour has nothing to have with a true friendly approach. (Note that has nothing to have with the relevant aspects of the objections.)

I know he has nothing against you, so it is not the same and study well his posts they were not exactly presented and not with the same emotion or attitude than the one he started to use at the very beginning when he addressed to me, and I can tell you, I saw it immediately and fully clearly, same way anyway he used in an other thread I had created he borred me so much I left him alone. ..

But tim, be sure I have no problem with positive, honest and RESPECTUL criticism, but don't ask me to be nice with the guy who still walk on my foot and intends to stay on!

What I won't never accept is his way to presuppose wrongness when he still not have the data and think he is "the only one" to know something in electronics and physics.

When he will grant more credit to our work and the honesty we invest in it in France, been able to recognise the positive aspects too, could be I will change my mind about him, but I have no reason to be nice with someone who has actively tried to insidiously denigrate my work here. Sorry for that.

Now, as you can see on my previous report, I have no problem to be contradicted and even could ask for!  ;D and indeed, verpies's objections helped me to find other very relevant data for the community here (even if these are not what I would expect ;) ).

Expressing objections is one thing, the way to do is an orher...

Best regards,
K.


I'll just inject one more thought here.   Having been on the Internet since the times before they even had web browsers I learned early on that it is often a big difference between talking to someone face to face and getting cues from their tone of voice versus writing text on the Internet where you cannot really tell a person's tone of voice easily.   Maybe things would be different if you were talking in person to verpies.   This is one reason smilies were created to assist in understanding a person's tone but not everyone is keen on using them.  I also do not see verpies as being trollish here - just wants to know that all has been done correctly as most people want to know this for the purpose of determining if it is worth investing their time and money in doing a replication.  Thanks for your understanding and continued sharing of info here.   

e2matrix

Quote from: tim123 on February 07, 2014, 07:21:32 AM
Wow, when people say that arduino's are easy to program, they're right... Since I last posted, I've built & compiled a library to run the DDS, and tested one to run the LCD...
Not tested the DDS yet - need connectors... Debugging might be a challenge...
Nice to know they are easy but I have to ask if you have previous programming skills or have worked with C++ language or similar?   I thought about getting an Arduino when they first got started but due to price decided to go with the Texas Instruments version called Launchpad as it was practically being given away at around $4.   But so far it has sat there as it looked like it would take way more of my time than I would like to spend to just get the basics down.   Of course there is less support for the Lauchpad than the Arduino but still a lot out there.   May I ask which Arduino you got or would recommend as I looked again recently and see a lot of choices now?   

tim123

Quote from: e2matrix on February 07, 2014, 02:35:23 PM
Nice to know they are easy but I have to ask if you have previous programming skills...

Ummm, actually it's my job...  I feel like i cheated...  :-[

;) lol

I've got an Arduino Uno (£10). The Due has much more power...

There's soooo much choice now with single-board-computers... Was looking at the Raspberry Pi - cos it's so popular. Olimex do some great boards... The problem is *always* the software - and the arduino folks seem to have it sussed with their 'wiring-code' language...

The one that's *really* interesting is this one: http://www.parallella.org/
Their SBC has a normal processor, and 16 extra processors in another chip. All for $99.
More processing power per watt that anything else available! I think i need one... :)