Probality of God

[WilbyInebriated]

Most of the things said in holy books are metaphors which are not to be taken literally.  The story may have some indirect / hidden meaning in that. 

Sceintific terminology has evolved recently and for the people belonging to 'non-scientific' period,  facts would have been said in the form of stories.


Nostradomus in his century IV, quatrain 97 says :

At forty-five degrees the sky will burn,
Fire to approach the great new city:
In an instant a great scattered flame will leap up,
When one will want to demand proof of the Normans

Anyone reading this quatrine would say that Nostradomus is an idiot because sky is not a material thing to burn.   But this became true when terrosists attacked WTC.   Nostradomus has referred  tall buildings as sky and New York as New City.


It is the responsibilty of great thinkers to find out the actual scientific facts hidden in the holy books in the form of stories / metaphors.

  if it involves a deity... then, by definition, it is outside of the laws of physics, which takes it out of the realm of science.


now i'll ask you again... even though i know you will respond with ANOTHER asinine logical fallacy:
exactly WHAT method(s) have you used to falsify all the other gods humanity has created?

and exactly WHAT method(s) have you used to validate your godfairy other than declaring it to be so by personal fiat?

[Newton II]

 


now i'll ask you again... even though i know you will respond with ANOTHER asinine logical fallacy:
exactly WHAT method(s) have you used to falsify all the other gods humanity has created?

and exactly WHAT method(s) have you used to validate your godfairy other than declaring it to be so by personal fiat?

Science has taught me 'seeing is believing'.    I have seen ghost (spirit)  while working in a project in a remote village in the presence of my colleagues and other workers.  Had I  seen it alone, I would have assumed that I have gone mad seeing imaginary things.   Since all the people present there also saw it and confirmed it,  I had to accept it because everyone cannot go mad at once.    Before that I was also a non-believer - atheist.     When ghosts are  there,  God also should be there hence I believe in God also.

If you have not seen ghosts,  don't believe unless you see one.

I cannot bring a ghost infront of you because ghosts are not under my control.

I accept my defeat.

Thanks.







       

[onthecuttingedge2005]

Science has taught me 'seeing is believing'.    I have seen ghost (spirit)  while working in a project in a remote village in the presence of my colleagues and other workers.  Had I  seen it alone, I would have assumed that I have gone mad seeing imaginary things.   Since all the people present there also saw it and confirmed it,  I had to accept it because everyone cannot go mad at once.    Before that I was also a non-believer - atheist.     When ghosts are  there,  God also should be there hence I believe in God also.

If you have not seen ghosts,  don't believe unless you see one.

I cannot bring a ghost infront of you because ghosts are not under my control.

I accept my defeat.

show me a ghost, i don't believe in any of that crap. ghost have nothing to with a god anyhow. think dimensional.

Thanks.







       

[Tito L. Oracion]

SCIENCE ALWAYS WANT YOU FALSIFY WHAT YOU DON'T SEE BUT FAITH FALSIFY SCIENCE 


AM I GOING TO REPEAT IT AGAIN WILBY WHAT FAITH IS!     


WHAT KIND OF KIND ARE YOU! YOU ! YOU!!!    JOKE 


OK ! I'LL EXPECT THE 'IDIOT' WORD COMMENT FROM WILBY IN THE NEXT POST. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH LOL 


gOT THAT!    YOU! YOU! .   


YOU BETTER WATCH OUT SANTA CLAUS IS COMING TO TOWN.    HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH LOL


LOVE YOU BROTHER 


OTITS L. NOICARO 

[CuriousChris]

Science has taught me 'seeing is believing'.         

No it didnt!

Your statement is nonfactual and disappointing. If you are going to make statements about science make sure you research your statement before you make it.

It has been proven many times over eye witnesses are very unreliable. Even when there is more than one. When it comes to claims of the supernatural, group hysteria is not uncommon. I like to call that group hysteria 'Religion'.

If you want to defer to science in your claim of seeing a ghost then you must expect that your statement would be treated with the greatest distrust, only empirical repeatable, quantifiable evidence would be accepted. So far there has not been one empirical test that proves the existence of ghosts.

Of course there are plenty who pray on people who believe in ghosts.